public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gaoliming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
To: "'Feng, Bob C'" <bob.c.feng@intel.com>, <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"'Yunhua Feng'" <fengyunhua@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: "'Chen, Christine'" <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] 回复: [PATCH] BaseTools: Should always define PCD TOKEN value as Zero for static PCD
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 08:49:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001101d6d40e$6df0b310$49d21930$@byosoft.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB407374ECEC29D2F3EA1F44C5C9C50@DM6PR11MB4073.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Bob:
  You are right. This patch is to avoid autogen header be changed when static PCD is added or removed. I will update BZ for this detail. 

  And, EFI_PCD_INVALID_TOKEN_NUMBER is defined in Ppi\Pcd.h. It is not included by AutoGen.h. I don't expect to include more header files into AutoGen.h. 
  So, I suggest to generate 0 as the token value for static PCD with the comments // EFI_PCD_INVALID_TOKEN_NUMBER.

Thanks
Liming
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
> 发送时间: 2020年12月16日 14:16
> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn; 'Yunhua Feng'
> <fengyunhua@byosoft.com.cn>
> 抄送: Chen, Christine <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
> 主题: RE: [edk2-devel] 回复: [PATCH] BaseTools: Should always define PCD
> TOKEN value as Zero for static PCD
> 
> Hi Liming,
> 
> So the PCD TOKEN is still useful for static PCD.
> 
> For the sentence of "AutoGen.h will not be changed when PCD is added or
> removed.",
> I think if a user adds or deletes a dynamic PCD, the AutoGen.h will still change.
> This patch need update the commit message.
> 
> For the code, I think it would be better to write "#define PcdTokenName
> EFI_PCD_INVALID_TOKEN_NUMBER" to AutoGen.h and add some comments
> about the usage of EFI_PCD_INVALID_TOKEN_NUMBER.
> Currently, PlatformAutoGen.PcdTokenNumber() still calculate the PCD TOKEN
> for static PCDs. I think that logic can also be deleted.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bob
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of gaoliming
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 10:10 AM
> To: Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; 'Yunhua Feng'
> <fengyunhua@byosoft.com.cn>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chen, Christine <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] 回复: [PATCH] BaseTools: Should always define PCD
> TOKEN value as Zero for static PCD
> 
> Bob:
>   Yes. Token value is designed for Dynamic and DynamicEx PCD. It is not used
> for static PCD. I propose to use EFI_PCD_INVALID_TOKEN_NUMBER (0) for
> the static PCD token value. If so, the consumer code can base on PcdToken
> value to know whether this PCD is dynamic or not.
> 
> Thanks
> Liming
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
> > 发送时间: 2020年12月16日 9:26
> > 收件人: Yunhua Feng <fengyunhua@byosoft.com.cn>;
> devel@edk2.groups.io
> > 抄送: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Chen, Christine
> > <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
> > 主题: RE: [PATCH] BaseTools: Should always define PCD TOKEN value as
> > Zero for static PCD
> >
> > Yunhua, if FixedAtBuild, PatchableInModule and FeatureFlag PCD don't
> > use PCD TOKEN, maybe it's better to remove "#define PcdTokenName
> TOKEN"
> > statement for those static PCD from AutoGen.h.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bob
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yunhua Feng <fengyunhua@byosoft.com.cn>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 9:03 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; Liming Gao
> > <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Chen, Christine <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] BaseTools: Should always define PCD TOKEN value as
> > Zero for static PCD
> >
> > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3120
> > FixedAtBuild, PatchableInModule and FeatureFlag PCD don't use PCD
> TOKEN.
> > Their PCD TOKEN value can always be zero. If so, AutoGen.h will not be
> > changed when PCD is added or removed.
> >
> > Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
> > Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> > Cc: Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yunhua Feng <fengyunhua@byosoft.com.cn>
> > ---
> >  BaseTools/Source/Python/AutoGen/GenC.py | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/Python/AutoGen/GenC.py
> > b/BaseTools/Source/Python/AutoGen/GenC.py
> > index a2053d5485..ac561ba82e 100755
> > --- a/BaseTools/Source/Python/AutoGen/GenC.py
> > +++ b/BaseTools/Source/Python/AutoGen/GenC.py
> > @@ -913,6 +913,8 @@ def CreateModulePcdCode(Info, AutoGenC,
> AutoGenH,
> > Pcd):
> >                                  ExtraData="[%s]" % str(Info))
> >          else:
> >              TokenNumber = PcdTokenNumber[Pcd.TokenCName,
> > Pcd.TokenSpaceGuidCName]
> > +        if Pcd.Type not in PCD_DYNAMIC_TYPE_SET:
> > +            TokenNumber = 0
> >          AutoGenH.Append('\n#define %s  %dU\n' % (PcdTokenName,
> > TokenNumber))
> >
> >      EdkLogger.debug(EdkLogger.DEBUG_3, "Creating code for " +
> > TokenCName + "." + Pcd.TokenSpaceGuidCName)
> > --
> > 2.27.0.windows.1
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




      reply	other threads:[~2020-12-17  0:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-16  1:03 [PATCH] BaseTools: Should always define PCD TOKEN value as Zero for static PCD fengyunhua
2020-12-16  1:26 ` Bob Feng
2020-12-16  2:09   ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-12-16  6:16     ` [edk2-devel] " Bob Feng
2020-12-17  0:49       ` gaoliming [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001101d6d40e$6df0b310$49d21930$@byosoft.com.cn' \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox