From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.byosoft.com.cn (mail.byosoft.com.cn [58.240.74.242]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.3205.1613626987093145627 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:43:11 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=none, err=permanent DNS error (domain: byosoft.com.cn, ip: 58.240.74.242, mailfrom: gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn) Received: from DESKTOPS6D0PVI ([58.246.60.130]) (envelope-sender ) by 192.168.6.13 with ESMTP for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:42:57 +0800 X-WM-Sender: gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn X-Originating-IP: 58.246.60.130 X-WM-AuthFlag: YES X-WM-AuthUser: gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn From: "gaoliming" To: , References: <006501d6fac7$3b08d9c0$b11a8d40$@byosoft.com.cn> <21774.1613426606968829020@groups.io> In-Reply-To: <21774.1613426606968829020@groups.io> Subject: =?UTF-8?B?5Zue5aSNOiBbZWRrMi1kZXZlbF0g5Zue5aSNOiBbZWRrMi1kZXZlbF0g5Zue5aSNOiBbUEFUQ0ggdjEgMS8xXSBCYXNlVG9vbHM6IEFsaWduIGluY2x1ZGUgZ3VhcmRzIHBvbGljeQ==?= Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:42:55 +0800 Message-ID: <001301d705b8$ea103110$be309330$@byosoft.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQIXhs0Bchau7DOT6JiQ7LKK8v0kMgDSgarRqdXOtjA= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_01D705FB.F8351EC0" Content-Language: zh-cn ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01D705FB.F8351EC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pierre: I agree to add this checker in ECC tool first. Then, we can start to disc= uss the topic about the code clean up on the early phase of next stable tag= .=20 =20 Thanks Liming =E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: bounce+27952+71690+4905953+8761045@groups.io = =E4=BB=A3=E8=A1=A8 PierreGon= dois =E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: 2021=E5=B9=B42=E6=9C=8816=E6=97=A5 6= :03 =E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: gaoliming ; devel@e= dk2.groups.io =E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: Re: [edk2-devel] =E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D: [edk2-devel] =E5= =9B=9E=E5=A4=8D: [PATCH v1 1/1] BaseTools: Align include guards policy =20 Hi Liming, I agree this is not an urgent change, but will there be a timeframe when n= on-essential clean-up is going to happen? Regards, Pierre=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01D705FB.F8351EC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Pierre:

= =C2=A0I agree to add this checker in ECC tool first. Then, we can start to= discuss the topic about the code clean up on the early phase of next stabl= e tag.

Thanks

Liming

=E5= =8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: bounce= +27952+71690+4905953+8761045@groups.io <bounce+27952+71690+4905953+87610= 45@groups.io> =E4=BB=A3=E8=A1=A8 PierreGondois
<= b>=E5=8F=91= = =E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: 2021=E5=B9= = =B42=E6=9C=8816=E6=97= =A5 6:03
=E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: gaoliming <gaoliming@byosof= t.com.cn>; devel@edk2.groups.io
=E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: Re: [edk2-devel] =E5=9B=9E= = =E5=A4=8D: [edk2-devel] =E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D: [PATCH v1 1/1] BaseTools: Align include guards policy

<= o:p>

Hi Limin= g,
I agree this is not an urgent change, but will there be a timeframe w= hen non-essential clean-up is going to happen?

Regards,
Pierre

------=_NextPart_000_0014_01D705FB.F8351EC0--