public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gaoliming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
To: <devel@edk2.groups.io>, <nhi@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	<derek.lin2@hpe.com>
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] UEFI spec version in system table, shall we update it to 2.8?
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 09:37:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <007601d72b4e$841c9c70$8c55d550$@byosoft.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR01MB58494063FED97E908FE58D4F96769@DM6PR01MB5849.prod.exchangelabs.com>

Nhi:
  So far, I don’t receive edk2 feature planning on the latest UEFI 2.8 & 2.
9 spec in edk2 community except for Redfish. 

  So, I suggest to keep current UEFI version 2.7 in system table.

Thanks
Liming
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> 代表 Nhi Pham via
> groups.io
> 发送时间: 2021年4月6日 20:13
> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; derek.lin2@hpe.com;
> gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn
> 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] UEFI spec version in system table, shall we update
it
> to 2.8?
> 
> + Liming Gao
> 
> I'm also interested in the plan for the edk2 in compliance with UEFI 2.8
> specification.
> 
> -Nhi
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> on behalf of Lin, Derek
> (HPS SW) via groups.io <derek.lin2=hpe.com@groups.io>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 12:52 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Subject: [edk2-devel] UEFI spec version in system table, shall we update
it to
> 2.8?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In UefiSpec.h, we define the UEFI version 2.7 in system table.
> 
> 
> #define EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (70))
> #define EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION
> EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION
> #define EFI_SPECIFICATION_VERSION       EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION
> #define EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_REVISION
> EFI_SPECIFICATION_VERSION
> 
> In Linux dmesg
> [    0.000000] efi: EFI v2.70 by EDK II
> 
> Shall it be updated to v2.8 to align with UEFI spec?
> 
> Thanks,
> Derek
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-07  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-31  5:52 UEFI spec version in system table, shall we update it to 2.8? Lin, Derek (HPS SW)
2021-04-06 12:12 ` [edk2-devel] " Nhi Pham
2021-04-07  1:37   ` gaoliming [this message]
2023-09-19 17:08     ` [edk2-devel] 回复: " karunakar_poosapalli via groups.io
2023-09-19 17:11       ` karunakar_poosapalli via groups.io
2023-09-19 18:18         ` Poosapalli, Karunakar via groups.io
2023-09-19 21:04           ` Michael D Kinney
2023-09-20  4:41             ` Poosapalli, Karunakar via groups.io
2023-09-20 18:59               ` Michael D Kinney
2023-09-20 19:12                 ` Poosapalli, Karunakar via groups.io

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='007601d72b4e$841c9c70$8c55d550$@byosoft.com.cn' \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox