edk2-stable202102 tag planning

edk2-stable202102 tag planning

[Laszlo Ersek]

Hi Liming,

quickly opening the BZs listed under

https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Planning#proposed-features

I find the following two tickets are not in RESOLVED status yet:

  CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Add native instruction support for X64
  https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2507

  OVMF RFE: VCPU hot-unplug with SMI
  https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3132

BZ#3132 is going to miss edk2-stable202102, so I was about to delete
that entry myself, from this list.

However, I noticed BZ#2507 too, and I don't know the status of that ticket.

I think it would be better to remove all tickets in one go that need to
be postponed to the next development cycle, at this point

Could you please ask the owners of #2507 about their status / plans?

And then, can you please remove #3132 (and, if needed, #2507 as well)
from the feature list?

Thanks!
Laszlo

回复: [edk2-devel] edk2-stable202102 tag planning

[gaoliming]

Laszlo:
  For 2507, I don't get the work plan for it. So, I will remove it for this stable tag together with 3132. 

Thanks
Liming
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: bounce+27952+71860+4905953+8761045@groups.io
> <bounce+27952+71860+4905953+8761045@groups.io> 代表 Laszlo Ersek
> 发送时间: 2021年2月20日 6:18
> 收件人: Liming Gao (Byosoft address) <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> 抄送: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>
> 主题: [edk2-devel] edk2-stable202102 tag planning
> 
> Hi Liming,
> 
> quickly opening the BZs listed under
> 
> https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Planni
> ng#proposed-features
> 
> I find the following two tickets are not in RESOLVED status yet:
> 
>   CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Add native instruction support for X64
>   https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2507
> 
>   OVMF RFE: VCPU hot-unplug with SMI
>   https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3132
> 
> BZ#3132 is going to miss edk2-stable202102, so I was about to delete
> that entry myself, from this list.
> 
> However, I noticed BZ#2507 too, and I don't know the status of that ticket.
> 
> I think it would be better to remove all tickets in one go that need to
> be postponed to the next development cycle, at this point
> 
> Could you please ask the owners of #2507 about their status / plans?
> 
> And then, can you please remove #3132 (and, if needed, #2507 as well)
> from the feature list?
> 
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
> 
> 
> 
> 
>