From: "gaoliming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
To: "'Matthew Carlson'" <matthewfcarlson@gmail.com>,
<devel@edk2.groups.io>, <macarl@microsoft.com>
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v10 0/5] Use RngLib instead of TimerLib for OpensslLib
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:39:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <008201d68bca$3356ceb0$9a046c10$@byosoft.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B86A21EB-A5EE-4CF8-995D-C1BF526F031D@hxcore.ol>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1957 bytes --]
I normally check Maintainers.txt and make sure each patch get the review from package maintainer or package reviewer.
Thanks
Liming
发件人: Matthew Carlson <matthewfcarlson@gmail.com>
发送时间: 2020年9月16日 9:00
收件人: gaoliming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; devel@edk2.groups.io; macarl@microsoft.com
主题: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v10 0/5] Use RngLib instead of TimerLib for OpensslLib
Thanks Liming!
Is there an easy way to check if all the patches have reviewed-by from maintainers?
I can confirm that each patch (now that you’ve given a reviewed by for Patch 1 & 2) has a reviewed by and some have a few reviewed by or acked by.
From: gaoliming <mailto:gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 5:57 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io <mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> ; macarl@microsoft.com <mailto:macarl@microsoft.com> ; Matthew Carlson <mailto:matthewfcarlson@gmail.com>
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v10 0/5] Use RngLib instead of TimerLib for OpensslLib
Matthew:
I just check this patch set. All 5 patches have got reviewed-by from the package maintainer or reviewer. Can you double confirm? If yes, I will help merge them.
Thanks
Liming
发件人: bounce+27952+65285+4905953+8761045@groups.io <mailto:bounce+27952+65285+4905953+8761045@groups.io> <bounce+27952+65285+4905953+8761045@groups.io <mailto:bounce+27952+65285+4905953+8761045@groups.io> > 代表 Matthew Carlson via groups.io
发送时间: 2020年9月16日 6:48
收件人: Matthew Carlson <matthewfcarlson@gmail.com <mailto:matthewfcarlson@gmail.com> >; devel@edk2.groups.io <mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
主题: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v10 0/5] Use RngLib instead of TimerLib for OpensslLib
Just pinging this thread to see what needs to get done next. Thank you Liming for the reviewed by on the MdeModulePkg changes.
--
- Matthew Carlson
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 7611 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: image001.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 145 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-01 17:37 [PATCH v10 0/5] Use RngLib instead of TimerLib for OpensslLib Matthew Carlson
2020-09-07 1:23 ` 回复: [edk2-devel] " gaoliming
2020-09-15 22:47 ` Matthew Carlson
2020-09-16 0:56 ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-09-16 1:00 ` Matthew Carlson
2020-09-16 1:39 ` gaoliming [this message]
2020-09-16 3:16 ` 回复: edk2-devel] " Matthew Carlson
2020-09-18 2:02 ` 回复: 回复: [edk2-devel] " gaoliming
2020-09-16 22:23 ` [edk2-devel] " Matthew Carlson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='008201d68bca$3356ceb0$9a046c10$@byosoft.com.cn' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox