From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.byosoft.com.cn (mail.byosoft.com.cn [58.240.74.242]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.18258.1611797098214963874 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:25:00 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=none, err=permanent DNS error (domain: byosoft.com.cn, ip: 58.240.74.242, mailfrom: gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn) Received: from DESKTOPS6D0PVI ([58.246.60.130]) (envelope-sender ) by 192.168.6.13 with ESMTP for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:24:53 +0800 X-WM-Sender: gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn X-WM-AuthFlag: YES X-WM-AuthUser: gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn From: "gaoliming" To: , , "'Laszlo Ersek'" References: ,<65208906-9273-cc27-3503-a37dd6d9cb58@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?5Zue5aSNOiBbRVhURVJOQUxdIFJlOiBbZWRrMi1kZXZlbF0gU3BlbGwgY2hlY2sgY29ycmVjdGlvbnMsIHBhY2thZ2UgYnkgcGFja2FnZQ==?= Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:24:55 +0800 Message-ID: <00a701d6f514$62ee6530$28cb2f90$@byosoft.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQMODI155nd/+Ev+/jZtOiNfFoc7ygKIg0C5AY07V3+nrV3q8A== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A8_01D6F557.7112B6A0" Content-Language: zh-cn ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01D6F557.7112B6A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable One BZ is for one package. If few change is made for single module, I would like to create one combined patch for one package.=20 =20 Thanks Liming =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: bounce+27952+70825+4905953+8761045@groups.io =B4=FA=B1=ED Bret Barkelew = via groups.io =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2021=C4=EA1=D4=C227=C8=D5 18:20 =CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: Laszlo Ersek ; devel@edk2.groups.io =D6=F7=CC=E2: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] Spell check corrections, pac= kage by package =20 Noted. I=A1=AFll see what that looks like. Thanks! =20 - Bret=20 =20 From: Laszlo Ersek =20 Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 1:42 AM To: devel@edk2.groups.io ; Bret Barkelew =20 Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] Spell check corrections, package by package =20 On 01/27/21 01:24, brbarkel via groups.io wrote: > When we added the SpellCheck to CI, we intended to move through package = by package and turn on the PR gate checks (right now they're all in "audit only"). To do this, we must first fix all the existing spelling errors and/or update the ignore lists and dictionaries with expected terms. >=20 > I would like to start this process so that we can get enforcement on in the next couple of months. To pick a random package, I was going to start with NetworkPkg. Before starting, I wanted to ask what the community would like to see in terms of the number of patches and/or associated bugs. I'm comfortable with whatever because I will likely automate the bug opening a= nd patch association (so beware if you want one bug per fix... there will be = a LOT of bugs). >=20 > Thoughts? One BZ for OvmfPkg should work, with one associated patch series for OvmfPkg. Each patch in the OvmfPkg series should fix typos in a given module (library or driver or application) in OvmfPkg. Duplicate all of the above for ArmVirtPkg (one BZ, one series, one patch per module). Thanks! Laszlo =20 ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01D6F557.7112B6A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

One BZ is for one package. If few change is made for single = module, I would like to create one combined patch for one package.

Thanks

Liming

=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: bounce+27952+70825+4905953+876104= 5@groups.io <bounce+27952+70825+4905953+8761045@groups.io> = =B4=FA=B1=ED Bret Barkelew via groups.io=B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC= =E4: 2021= =C4=EA1=D4=C227=C8=D5<= span lang=3DEN-US> 18:20
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB= : Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; dev= el@edk2.groups.io
=D6=F7=CC=E2:<= span lang=3DEN-US> Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] Spell check corrections,= package by package

<= span lang=3DEN-US>Noted. I=A1=AFll see what that looks like. Thanks!

- Bret

From: Laszlo Ersek
Sent:= Wednesday, January 27, 2021 1:42 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Bret Barkelew
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2= -devel] Spell check corrections, package by package

On 01/2= 7/21 01:24, brbarkel via groups.io wrote:
> When we added the SpellCh= eck to CI, we intended to move through package by package and turn on the P= R gate checks (right now they're all in "audit only"). To do this= , we must first fix all the existing spelling errors and/or update the igno= re lists and dictionaries with expected terms.
>
> I would lik= e to start this process so that we can get enforcement on in the next coupl= e of months. To pick a random package, I was going to start with NetworkPkg= . Before starting, I wanted to ask what the community would like to see in = terms of the number of patches and/or associated bugs. I'm comfortable with= whatever because I will likely automate the bug opening and patch associat= ion (so beware if you want one bug per fix... there will be a LOT of bugs).=
>
> Thoughts?

One BZ for OvmfPkg should work, with one= associated patch series for
OvmfPkg. Each patch in the OvmfPkg series s= hould fix typos in a given
module (library or driver or application) in = OvmfPkg.

Duplicate all of the above for ArmVirtPkg (one BZ, one seri= es, one patch
per module).

Thanks!
Laszlo

<= p class=3DMsoNormal>

------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01D6F557.7112B6A0--