public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Fan, Jeff" <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@ml01.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>,
	"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Put AP into safe hlt-loop code on S3 path
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:17:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00b6828b-78c5-af4f-ab98-de4460b1b8ec@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <542CF652F8836A4AB8DBFAAD40ED192A4A2DB4F5@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On 11/13/16 13:51, Fan, Jeff wrote:
> Laszlo,
> 
> Thanks your testing. It seems that there is still some unknown issue existing.
> 
> I suggest to push this serial of patches firstly, because they have
> big progress to solve the AP crashed issue in
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216.

Sounds good to me.

> I could submit another bug to handle "AP lost" issue.

I hope that Paolo can continue to help us with the KVM trace analysis.

> Thus, JIewen's
> or others' patches could be push as long as they have no additional
> issue except for "AP Lost:".

I haven't gotten around testing Jiewen's v3 series yet. I think it would
be best if I could test Jiewen's v3 after this v2 series of yours is
committed. I'll report back with results.

Thanks
Laszlo

> 
> I could follow up to fix "AP Lost" issue.
> 
> Thanks!
> Jeff
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 3:49 AM
> To: Fan, Jeff
> Cc: edk2-devel@ml01.01.org; Yao, Jiewen; Paolo Bonzini
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 0/3] Put AP into safe hlt-loop code on S3 path
> 
> On 11/11/16 06:45, Jeff Fan wrote:
>> On S3 path, we will wake up APs to restore CPU context in 
>> PiSmmCpuDxeSmm driver. In case, one NMI or SMI happens, APs may exit 
>> from hlt state and execute the instruction after HLT instruction.
>>
>> But APs are not running on safe code, it leads OVMF S3 boot unstable.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216
>>
>> I tested real platform with 64bit DXE.
>>
>> v2:
>>   1. Make stack alignment per Laszlo's comment.
>>   2. Trim whitespace at end of end per Laszlo's comment.
>>   3. Update year mark in file header.
>>   4. Enhancement on InterlockedDecrement() per Paolo's comment.
>>
>> Jeff Fan (3):
>>   UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Put AP into safe hlt-loop code on S3 path
>>   UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Place AP to 32bit protected mode on S3 path
>>   UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Decrease mNumberToFinish in AP safe code
>>
>>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c             | 33 +++++++++++++-
>>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c | 29 +++++++++++-
>>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h    | 15 +++++++
>>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c  | 63 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  4 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Applied this locally to master (ffd6b0b1b65e) for testing. I tested the series with a suspend-resume loop -- not a busy loop, just manually. (So there was always one second or so between adjacent steps.)
> 
> No crashes or emulation failures, but the "AP going lost" issue remains present -- sometimes Linux cannot bring up one of the four VCPUs after resume.
> 
> In the Ia32 case, this "AP lost" symptom surfaced after the 6th resume.
> 
> In the Ia32X64 case, I experienced the symptom after the 89th resume.
> 
> Thanks
> Laszlo
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-14  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-11  5:45 [PATCH v2 0/3] Put AP into safe hlt-loop code on S3 path Jeff Fan
2016-11-11  5:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: " Jeff Fan
2016-11-11  5:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Place AP to 32bit protected mode " Jeff Fan
2016-11-11  5:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Decrease mNumberToFinish in AP safe code Jeff Fan
2016-11-11 10:16   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-11 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Put AP into safe hlt-loop code on S3 path Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-13 12:51   ` Fan, Jeff
2016-11-14  1:41     ` Yao, Jiewen
2016-11-14  8:17     ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-11-14  8:50       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-14 10:39         ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-14 11:09           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-14 11:27             ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-14 12:00               ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-14 18:07                 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-14 18:13                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-14 23:56                     ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-15  0:47                       ` Fan, Jeff
2016-11-15  1:03                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-15  1:04                           ` Fan, Jeff
2016-11-15  1:19                       ` Fan, Jeff
2016-11-15  1:30                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-15  1:27                       ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-15  1:38                         ` Fan, Jeff
     [not found] ` <542CF652F8836A4AB8DBFAAD40ED192A4A2DCDE3@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-11-15  1:21   ` Yao, Jiewen
2016-11-15  1:24     ` Fan, Jeff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=00b6828b-78c5-af4f-ab98-de4460b1b8ec@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox