From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.byosoft.com.cn (mail.byosoft.com.cn [58.240.74.242]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.7480.1623316535883785486 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 02:15:36 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=none, err=permanent DNS error (domain: byosoft.com.cn, ip: 58.240.74.242, mailfrom: gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn) Received: from DESKTOPS6D0PVI ([58.246.60.130]) (envelope-sender ) by 192.168.6.13 with ESMTP for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:15:27 +0800 X-WM-Sender: gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn X-Originating-IP: 58.246.60.130 X-WM-AuthFlag: YES X-WM-AuthUser: gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn From: "gaoliming" To: , , "'Dov Murik'" , "'Ard Biesheuvel'" Cc: "'Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum'" , "'Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum'" , "'Jim Cadden'" , "'James Bottomley'" , "'Hubertus Franke'" , "'Jordan Justen'" , "'Ashish Kalra'" , "'Brijesh Singh'" , "'Erdem Aktas'" , "'Jiewen Yao'" , "'Min Xu'" , "'Tom Lendacky'" References: <20210525053116.1533673-1-dovmurik@linux.ibm.com> <5d8c598e-31de-7973-df51-e913bba54587@redhat.com> <3cead34f-a736-3a5d-4933-cebc085ca868@redhat.com> <980736b6-2450-c695-98f5-84870c4ba3ee@redhat.com> <510c9680-c0c7-a413-5bac-80e54578d1df@linux.ibm.com> <30251804-1409-4469-af31-50cbea8703cb@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <30251804-1409-4469-af31-50cbea8703cb@redhat.com> Subject: =?UTF-8?B?5Zue5aSNOiBbZWRrMi1kZXZlbF0gW1BBVENIIHYxIDAvOF0gTWVhc3VyZWQgU0VWIGJvb3Qgd2l0aCBrZXJuZWwvaW5pdHJkL2NtZGxpbmU=?= Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:15:30 +0800 Message-ID: <00b801d75dd9$28d5b6e0$7a8124a0$@byosoft.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQGHUKG7eoTPFAZNY3PyrbBOaB6oWgKvOpiPAbx0U3kCQookFQGZba0HAVJzPngBXtNETQLvtXmZAdUzEsQCciTV0asbkQ+Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: zh-cn Dov: Can you submit one BZ for this new feature? I will add it into edk2 2021= 08 stable tag planning.=20 Thanks Liming > -----=E9=82=AE=E4=BB=B6=E5=8E=9F=E4=BB=B6----- > =E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: devel@edk2.groups.io = =E4=BB=A3=E8=A1=A8 Laszlo Ersek > =E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: 2021=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=889=E6=97=A5 = 21:54 > =E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Dov Murik ; devel@e= dk2.groups.io; Ard > Biesheuvel > =E6=8A=84=E9=80=81: Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum ; Tobin > Feldman-Fitzthum ; Jim Cadden ; > James Bottomley ; Hubertus Franke > ; Jordan Justen ; Ashish > Kalra ; Brijesh Singh ; > Erdem Aktas ; Jiewen Yao > ; Min Xu ; Tom Lendacky > > =E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/8] Measured SEV boot wi= th > kernel/initrd/cmdline >=20 > On 06/09/21 14:25, Dov Murik wrote: > > > > > > On 08/06/2021 18:59, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> On 06/08/21 14:09, Dov Murik wrote: > >>> On 08/06/2021 13:59, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >>>> On 06/08/21 11:57, Dov Murik wrote: > >> > > > >>> > >>> But if we go with (1) -- do you (and Ard) prefer: > >>> > >>> (a) leave X86QemuLoadImageLib as it is in master; > >>> > >>> -or- > >>> > >>> (b) modify X86QemuLoadImageLib the "main" path to use the > >>> QemuKernelLoaderFs (what I started doing) and leave the "legacy" pat= h > >>> with QemuFwCfg > >>> > >>> ? > >> > >> I prefer option (a), with the extension that we need to update the > >> following file-top comment in the files under > >> "OvmfPkg/Library/X86QemuLoadImageLib": > >> > >> X86 specific implementation of QemuLoadImageLib library class > interface > >> with support for loading mixed mode images and non-EFI stub images > >> > > > > First attempt at this is submitted to the mailing list: > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/76265 > > > > > >> We should add a warning there that this library instance (a) depends = on > >> fw_cfg directly, and (b) is therefore unsuitable for blob verificatio= n > >> purposes. > > > > I'll add the warning (b) when I add the blob verification feature. >=20 > That makes sense to me, thanks. > Laszlo >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20