From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=210.71.195.45; helo=out01.hibox.biz; envelope-from=tim.lewis@insyde.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from out01.hibox.biz (out05.hibox.biz [210.71.195.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA49621ED1C50 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 09:59:09 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2D/AQBdeqFa/ws0GKxeGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYMjLWZvKI5hjwcyAWOCMpF3ghUKGAuEfAQCAoMJIjUXAQIBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQECayeFIwEBAQQBAQYCHhIcCBAXAQMCBgMNBAQBAS8ZDgEREAEFCAIEARILB?= =?us-ascii?q?YUJD60JOCEChE6DeYITBYU1hASFE4MuAQSHWQSOZItrCQKCC4Q8hXuEJIFjhDS?= =?us-ascii?q?DB4VDiXmHToEsHwE2gVJwT4JDP4IkbgECgRUfN4s6AQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,441,1515427200"; d="scan'208";a="19610990" Received: from unknown (HELO hb3-BKT201.hibox.biz) ([172.24.52.11]) by out01.hibox.biz with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2018 02:05:23 +0800 Received: from unknown (HELO hb3-BKT102.hibox.biz) ([172.24.51.12]) by hb3-BKT201.hibox.biz with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2018 02:05:23 +0800 Received: from unknown (HELO hb3-IN04.hibox.biz) ([172.24.12.14]) by hb3-BKT102.hibox.biz with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2018 02:05:23 +0800 X-Remote-IP: 73.116.1.175 X-Remote-Host: c-73-116-1-175.hsd1.ca.comcast.net X-SBRS: -10.0 X-MID: 11288654 X-Auth-ID: tim.lewis@insyde.com X-EnvelopeFrom: tim.lewis@insyde.com hiBox-Sender: 1 Received: from c-73-116-1-175.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (HELO DESKTOPAVHFBJF) ([73.116.1.175]) by hb3-IN04.hibox.biz with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 09 Mar 2018 02:05:23 +0800 From: "Tim Lewis" To: "'Bjorge, Erik C'" , References: <7FE3244EBB31F1449E4EC79CFE44E3F4ACA8ED8F@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <7FE3244EBB31F1449E4EC79CFE44E3F4ACA8ED8F@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:05:17 -0800 Message-ID: <00ef01d3b708$059e05e0$10da11a0$@insyde.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-index: AQE/mp2iTChF+hHEA/7BCZfUIzzdGqTu2j4A Subject: Re: RFC: Proposal to halt automatic builds of Windows BaseTools executables X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:59:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-language: en-us Erik -- What is the justification? Moving from more immediately usable to less immediately usable doesn't seem, on the surface, to be a good direction. Why not go the other direction and pre-build the binaries for the other environments? Thanks, Tim -----Original Message----- From: edk2-devel On Behalf Of Bjorge, Erik C Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 9:57 AM To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org Subject: [edk2] RFC: Proposal to halt automatic builds of Windows BaseTools executables I would like to propose that the automatic builds of Windows BaseTools executables be halted. This implies there will no longer be updates to the edk2-BaseTools-win32 repository. With this change, developers using Windows must install Python 2.7.x and configure their environment to build C tools and run python scripts from sources. This matches the development experience for non-Windows environments. Please respond with comments by 03/23/2018. Thanks, -Erik _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel