From: "Michael Brown" <mcb30@ipxe.org>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, ray.ni@intel.com,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Another solution to the nested interrupt issue
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:03:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0102018d40b796c3-4a61aa4c-dc30-444d-b731-470396d46072-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN6PR11MB82443B73244CEF84481629F08C7A2@MN6PR11MB8244.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 25/01/2024 07:57, Ni, Ray wrote:
> This mail is to bring another approach to solve the stack-overflow due
> to nested interrupts. Michael solved this problem in OVMF through
> NestedInterruptTplLib.
>
> I made a draft patch as attached “DxeCore.diff”. The patch simply to
> avoid the interrupt in enable state when TPL is dropped to the
> interrupted TPL. The interrupt will be enabled later through “IRET”.
I don't disagree with the approach, but it does break the API as per the
UEFI PI specification (version 1.8 section II-12.10), and so this is not
something that can just be dropped in as an EDK2 code change.
There are no version number fields or spare parameters (that I can see)
that could be used within EFI_TIMER_ARCH_PROTOCOL to allow for this
change of semantics, so this would have to be a breaking change.
I think you'd need to first define an EFI_TIMER_ARCH2_PROTOCOL with
different semantics for RegisterHandler(), but I'm not a UEFI Forum
member and I have no idea what the bureaucratic process is for pushing
through this kind of change. I suspect we'd end up having to support
both protocol variants (which means added maintenance burden).
It might be plausible instead to extend EFI_CPU_ARCH_PROTOCOL in a
backwards-compatible way. The InterruptType parameter to
RegisterInterruptHandler() is already handled in a very casual way: the
UEFI spec defines a limited range of possible types (0-19 for IA32/X64)
for EFI_EXCEPTION_TYPE, but the code in LocalApicTimerDxe.c already
treats it as meaning just an IRQ vector number by passing the value
LOCAL_APIC_TIMER_VECTOR=32.
(Incidentally, the code comments in MdePkg/Include/Protocol/Cpu.h are
completely wrong - the description of the InterruptType parameter seems
to have been copied from the description of the State parameter in
EFI_CPU_GET_INTERRUPT_STATE.)
The extension I'm thinking of could be:
- Clean up the definition of EFI_EXCEPTION_TYPE to clarify that it
represents a CPU interrupt vector number (if this is how all current
architectures actually use it).
- Extend the definition of EFI_EXCEPTION_TYPE to include a high bit flag
that can be ORed on to the exception type, e.g.
#define EFI_EXCEPTION_TYPE_TPL_HIGH 0x01000000
- The RegisterInterruptHandler() implementation could then treat this
flag as meaning that the handler should be called via a wrapper that
does RaiseTPL(TPL_HIGH_LEVEL) before calling the handler, and the
equivalent of your CoreRestoreTplDeferEnableInterrupt() after the
handler returns, i.e. that the handler is automatically called at
TPL_HIGH_LEVEL.
This would not make any breaking change to the definitions of
EFI_TIMER_ARCH_PROTOCOL or EFI_CPU_ARCH_PROTOCOL, and so would not
require an ARCH2_PROTOCOL variant to be created.
I haven't tried implementing this to see if it's viable, so I've
probably missed something crucial.
Personally I would go for moving NestedInterruptTplLib to MdeModulePkg
since this can be done today, whereas anything involving a spec change
will take a lot more time, but that's not my call.
Thanks,
Michael
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#114401): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/114401
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103950154/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 7:57 [edk2-devel] RFC: Another solution to the nested interrupt issue Ni, Ray
2024-01-25 13:03 ` Michael Brown [this message]
2024-01-25 13:54 ` Ni, Ray
2024-01-25 14:25 ` Michael Brown
2024-01-25 15:06 ` Ni, Ray
2024-01-25 15:29 ` Michael Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0102018d40b796c3-4a61aa4c-dc30-444d-b731-470396d46072-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox