回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] CryptoPkg/BaseCryptLib: Fix possible uninitialized use

["gaoliming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>]

Jian:
  These three patches are separate. They don't impact others. So, I think we can merge single one. 

Thanks
Liming
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> 发送时间: 2021年5月18日 15:36
> 收件人: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>; edk2-devel-groups-io
> <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Liming Gao (Byosoft address)
> <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> 抄送: sergei@posteo.net; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Lu, XiaoyuX
> <xiaoyux.lu@intel.com>; Jiang, Guomin <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
> 主题: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] CryptoPkg/BaseCryptLib: Fix possible
> uninitialized use
> 
> Ard,
> 
> Patch 1&2 haven't got r-b. I'm not sure we can merge patch 3 separately.
> 
> Regards,
> Jian
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 3:27 PM
> > To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Liming Gao (Byosoft
> address)
> > <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> > Cc: sergei@posteo.net; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J
> > <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Lu, XiaoyuX <xiaoyux.lu@intel.com>; Jiang,
> Guomin
> > <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] CryptoPkg/BaseCryptLib: Fix
> possible
> > uninitialized use
> >
> > Please merge this fix asap. Our CI is broken because of it, and we are
> > in the soft freeze so we need the CI up and running to catch potential
> > issues before the release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ard.
> >
> > On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 02:59, gaoliming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sergei:
> > >   Yes. GCC49 is LTO disable GCC tool chain. GCC5 is LTO enable tool
> chain.
> > > They both work on the different GCC version, such as gcc5, gcc6..
> > >
> > >   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90844 mentions
> > > -ffat-lto-objects option that can trig the warning with LTO option. Do you
> > > try it?
> > >
> > >   If this option works, we can update GCC5 tool chain definition in
> > > tools_def.txt, then this issue can be detected in CI GCC5 build.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Liming
> > > > -----邮件原件-----
> > > > 发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> 代表 Sergei
> > > > Dmitrouk
> > > > 发送时间: 2021年5月15日 21:01
> > > > 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; jiewen.yao@intel.com
> > > > 抄送: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Lu, XiaoyuX
> > > > <xiaoyux.lu@intel.com>; Jiang, Guomin <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
> > > > 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] CryptoPkg/BaseCryptLib: Fix
> possible
> > > > uninitialized use
> > > >
> > > > Hello Jiewen,
> > > >
> > > > I get the error only for GCC49 and not for GCC5 toolchain.  CI uses
> GCC5.
> > > >
> > > > So I compared build commands and this seems to depend on LTO.
> Adding
> > > > `-flto`
> > > > impedes compiler's ability to detect such simple issues.
> > > >
> > > > I've found relevant bug report, there is even fix suggestion from last
> > > month:
> > > >
> > > >     https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90844
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Sergei
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 12:30:44AM +0000, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> > > > > Hi Sergei
> > > > > Thank you very much for the fix.
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > I am a little surprised why it is not caught before. It is an obvious
> > > logic issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you think we can do anything on CI, to catch it during pre-check-in
> > > in the
> > > > future?
> > > > > I just feel it is burden to make it post-check-in fix.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you
> > > > > Yao Jiewen
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Sergei Dmitrouk <sergei@posteo.net>
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 8:17 PM
> > > > > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > > > > Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J
> > > > <jian.j.wang@intel.com>;
> > > > > > Lu, XiaoyuX <xiaoyux.lu@intel.com>; Jiang, Guomin
> > > > <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
> > > > > > Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] CryptoPkg/BaseCryptLib: Fix possible
> > > uninitialized
> > > > use
> > > > > >
> > > > > > `Result` can be used uninitialized in both functions after following
> > > > > > either first or second `goto` statement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Xiaoyu Lu <xiaoyux.lu@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Dmitrouk <sergei@posteo.net>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Pk/CryptRsaPss.c     | 1 +
> > > > > >  CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Pk/CryptRsaPssSign.c | 1 +
> > > > > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Pk/CryptRsaPss.c
> > > > > > b/CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Pk/CryptRsaPss.c
> > > > > > index 4009d37d5f91..0b2960f06c4c 100644
> > > > > > --- a/CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Pk/CryptRsaPss.c
> > > > > > +++ b/CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Pk/CryptRsaPss.c
> > > > > > @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ RsaPssVerify (
> > > > > >    EVP_PKEY_CTX *KeyCtx;
> > > > > >    CONST EVP_MD  *HashAlg;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +  Result = FALSE;
> > > > > >    EvpRsaKey = NULL;
> > > > > >    EvpVerifyCtx = NULL;
> > > > > >    KeyCtx = NULL;
> > > > > > diff --git a/CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Pk/CryptRsaPssSign.c
> > > > > > b/CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Pk/CryptRsaPssSign.c
> > > > > > index b66b6f7296ad..ece765f9ae0a 100644
> > > > > > --- a/CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Pk/CryptRsaPssSign.c
> > > > > > +++ b/CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Pk/CryptRsaPssSign.c
> > > > > > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ RsaPssSign (
> > > > > >    EVP_PKEY_CTX          *KeyCtx;
> > > > > >    CONST EVP_MD          *HashAlg;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +  Result = FALSE;
> > > > > >    EvpRsaKey = NULL;
> > > > > >    EvpVerifyCtx = NULL;
> > > > > >    KeyCtx = NULL;
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.17.6
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > >