From: "Tim Lewis" <tim.lewis@insyde.com>
To: <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Subject: Components sub-section ordering
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:56:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <017c01d644c8$3c4bb1f0$b4e315d0$@insyde.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1378 bytes --]
EDK2 build tool gurus:
Question: The current EDK2 .DSC specification, section 3.10 says that the
sub-elements in a Component must follow a specific ordering (LibraryClasses,
Pcds*, BuildOptions). But it is not clear why this is required. As a side
note, we have a number of .dsc files where this is not followed today, but
our tools developers wanted to know if this should be enforced.
Here is the text from the spec:
Within the context of an EDK II module sub-element, the <LibraryClasses>
entries must appear before <Pcds*> entries; the <LibraryClasses> entries
terminate with the start of either the <Pcds*> or <BuildOptions> sub-section
header or the end of the scope defined by the right curly "}" brace. The
<BuildOptions> sub-element must be the last sub-entry of an EDK II module's
scoped section. Entries for <LibraryClasses>, <Pcds*> and <BuildOptions> are
used to replace the platform or global definition entries listed elsewhere.
LibraryClass and PCDs are globally defined in the DSC file's
[LibraryClasses] and [Pcds*] sections, while global BuildOptions may be
specified in either the DSC file's [BuildOptions] section or in the
$(WORKSPACE)/Conf/tools_def.txt file.
I would also note that the <Defines> is not listed here.
Can we just elide this?
Thanks,
Tim Lewis
CTO, Insyde Software
www.insyde.com <http://www.insyde.com>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4299 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-17 16:56 Tim Lewis [this message]
2020-06-17 19:01 ` [edk2-devel] Components sub-section ordering Michael D Kinney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='017c01d644c8$3c4bb1f0$b4e315d0$@insyde.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox