From: Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: Stack issue after warm UEFI reset and MMU enabling on an Armv8 platform
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:58:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0203a14be46555436db1c8d5e58064ae@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-7Yyo=yK=KmN+BCUs7NrzbZ_F8x_GiU+zghpTY5ioWuQ@mail.gmail.com>
>From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 4:38 PM
>To: Vladimir Olovyannikov
>Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>Subject: Re: Stack issue after warm UEFI reset and MMU enabling on an Armv8
>platform
>On 19 September 2018 at 15:55, Vladimir Olovyannikov
><vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>Hi All,
>>I need UEFI experts help on the problem with Armv8 board on warm UEFI
>>reset.
>>Cold reset works fine.
>>Here is how I set up a warm reset:
>>STATIC
>>EFI_STATUS
>>ShutdownUefiBootServices (
>> VOID
>> )
>>{
>> EFI_STATUS Status;
>> UINTN MemoryMapSize;
>> EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR *MemoryMap;
>> UINTN MapKey;
>> UINTN DescriptorSize;
>> UINT32 DescriptorVersion;
>> UINTN Pages;
>> MemoryMap = NULL;
>> MemoryMapSize = 0;
>> Pages = 0;
>>
>> do {
>> Status = gBS->GetMemoryMap (
>> &MemoryMapSize,
>> MemoryMap,
>> &MapKey,
>> &DescriptorSize,
>> &DescriptorVersion
>> );
>> if (Status == EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL) {
>>
>> Pages = EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (MemoryMapSize) + 1;
>> MemoryMap = AllocatePages (Pages);
>>
>> //
>> // Get System MemoryMap
>> //
>> Status = gBS->GetMemoryMap (
>> &MemoryMapSize,
>> MemoryMap,
>> &MapKey,
>> &DescriptorSize,
>> &DescriptorVersion
>> );
>> }
>>
>> // Don't do anything between the GetMemoryMap() and ExitBootServices()
>> if (!EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
>> Status = gBS->ExitBootServices (gImageHandle, MapKey);
>> if (EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
>> FreePages (MemoryMap, Pages);
>> MemoryMap = NULL;
>> MemoryMapSize = 0;
>> }
>> }
>> } while (EFI_ERROR(Status));
>>
>> return Status;
>>}
>>
>>Then perform
>>ArmCleanDataCache ();
>>ArmInvalidateDataCache ();
>>ArmDisableInstructionCache ();
>>ArmInvalidateInstructionCache ();
>These don't do anything useful on ARM. You can only reliably perform cache
>maintenance by virtual address.
So, should I just remove them altogether?
>>ArmDisableMmu ();
>... so after this call returns, all bets are off with regards to whether
>what is popped from the stack is actually what we pushed when we entered
>the function.
OK, thank you for explanation.
But this call returns back into ResetLib implementation as it should, and
then there is a direct jump to the start of FV.
Am I doing anything wrong here?
Then, up to the point of enabling of MMU the stack is OK. But right after
enabling MMU it points at _ModuleEntryPoint end of function in
DxeCoreEntryPoint.c
Am I missing anything? Maybe some stack cleanup before jumping to the start
of FV?
>>Then jump to start of FV:
>>typedef
>>VOID
>> (EFIAPI *START_FV)(
>> VOID
>>);
>>StartOfFv = (START_FV)(UINTN)PcdGet64(PcdFvBaseAddress);
>>StartOfFv ();
>>
>>Now this is what happens on warm reset:
>>reset -c warm
>>1. Until ArmEnableMmu() gets called, everything works as expected.
>> Here is the stack right before ArmEnableMmu() is called:
>> ArmConfigureMmu+0x4f8
>> InitMmu+0x24
>> MemoryPeim+0x440
>> PrePiMain+0x114
>> PrimaryMain+0x68
>> CEntryPoint+0xC4
>> EL2:0x00000000800008BC
>> ----- End of stack info -----
>>
>>2. Here is the stack as soon as Mmu is enabled with ArmEnableMmu() :
>> ArmConfigureMmu+0x4fc <-- This one is correct, at line 745 in
>> ArmConfigureMmu() in ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/AArch64/ArmMmuLibCore.c
>> (return EFI_SUCCESS)
>> _ModuleEntryPoint+0x24 <-- Wrong. This points directly to
>> ASSERT(FALSE); and to CpuDeadLoop() in DxeCoreEntryPoint.c, lines 59-60.
>> El2:0x000000008E5E8300 <-- Absolutely bogus
>> --- End of stack info ---
>>
>>So, as soon as ArmEnableMmu() exits, execution jumps directly to
>>CpuDeadLoop() in DxeCoreEntryPoint of _ModuleEntryPoint().
>>
>>Would be grateful for any advice.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-19 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-19 22:55 Stack issue after warm UEFI reset and MMU enabling on an Armv8 platform Vladimir Olovyannikov
2018-09-19 23:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-19 23:58 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov [this message]
2018-09-19 23:56 ` Bill Paul
2018-09-20 0:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-20 21:52 Vladimir Olovyannikov
2018-09-21 23:24 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
2018-09-21 23:57 ` Andrew Fish
2018-09-22 0:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-24 17:44 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0203a14be46555436db1c8d5e58064ae@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox