public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nate DeSimone" <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Shenglei" <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Kubacki, Michael A" <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>,
	"Chiu, Chasel" <chasel.chiu@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Add return value when OutTable is NULL
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:25:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02A34F284D1DA44BB705E61F7180EF0AAEED9252@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916010857.42264-1-shenglei.zhang@intel.com>

Hi Shenglei,

I don't see how this patch is at all related to the previous version of this patch. Also, you are introducing yet another new bug with this patch. Moreover, this bug is unrelated to the previous bug.

Please take a look at the function TestPointGetAcpi(). With your change added, this function is now broken since Table is a stack variable and it is not being initialized to zero. This function assumes that DumpAcpiXsdt()/DumpAcpiRsdt() will do the initialization to zero on it's behalf, you have broken this assumption with your change.

Both this patch and the previous patch have been made carelessly and I am not impressed.

Thanks,
Nate

-----Original Message-----
From: Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com> 
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2019 6:09 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Add return value when OutTable is NULL

Currently there is no check for the parameter OutTable.
So add the logic that return value EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER when the OutTable is NULL.

Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
---

v2:Update the copyright and the if...else statement coding style.

 .../Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheckAcpi.c           | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheckAcpi.c b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheckAcpi.c
index 263781a2..83736bf3 100644
--- a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheckAcpi.c
+++ b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCh
+++ eckAcpi.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /** @file
 
-Copyright (c) 2017, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
+Copyright (c) 2017 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
 SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
 
 **/
@@ -610,6 +610,8 @@ DumpAcpiRsdt (
 
   if (OutTable != NULL) {
     *OutTable = NULL;
+  } else{
+    return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
   }
 
   ReturnStatus = EFI_SUCCESS;
@@ -663,6 +665,8 @@ DumpAcpiXsdt (
   
   if (OutTable != NULL) {
     *OutTable = NULL;
+  } else{
+    return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
   }
 
   ReturnStatus = EFI_SUCCESS;
--
2.18.0.windows.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-16 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-16  1:08 [PATCH v2] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Add return value when OutTable is NULL Zhang, Shenglei
2019-09-16  2:17 ` Chiu, Chasel
2019-09-16 19:25 ` Nate DeSimone [this message]
2019-09-17  2:48   ` Zhang, Shenglei
2019-09-17 21:46     ` Nate DeSimone
2019-09-19  4:25 ` [edk2-devel] " Kubacki, Michael A

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=02A34F284D1DA44BB705E61F7180EF0AAEED9252@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox