From: "Tim Lewis" <tim.lewis@insyde.com>
To: <devel@edk2.groups.io>, <tim.lewis@insyde.com>, <afish@apple.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Mappings and StdLib
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:06:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05a701d56425$590a9150$0b1fb3f0$@insyde.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15C19AC418D00FDA.11246@groups.io>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2437 bytes --]
Ok, now I found my answer. DevShell library class must be included with StdLib in order to correctly process shell-style input parameters. Without it, it falls back on DevConsole
Thanks,
Tim
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Tim Lewis
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 10:25 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; afish@apple.com
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Mappings and StdLib
Andrew –
There is a standard call that provides this service, but I am porting over BSD utils to the shell and they just take a straight path and call open. So I want open to behave the way I expect it to. IN fact, the low level code separates out the “drive” from the path already, but the current library doesn’t add in the mappings into the list that gets created (it is used for stdin: stdout: and stderr:) The thing is that the underlying Shell APIs do handle this case, but the mapping is stripped before it gets to that layer.
Tim
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io <mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> > On Behalf Of Andrew Fish via Groups.Io
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 5:35 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io <mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> ; tim.lewis@insyde.com <mailto:tim.lewis@insyde.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Mappings and StdLib
Tim,
I don't know about the plans with the StdLib, but I do remember a long time ago with the old shell there was a protocol that let you translate volume names (mappings) into handles and device paths.
So you could write a simple library that has 2 styles of APIs:
1) Handle + FilePath in Shell mapping with Volume Name out
2) Shell file path with mapping Volume names in and Simple File System handle Out with the file path
a) A device path out version of this is also useful
You can make the lib just error return if the Shell protocol does not exist so you don't make it a requirement. The caller handles that failure as the current working volume/directory case.
Thanks,
Andrew Fish
On Sep 4, 2019, at 5:14 PM, Tim Lewis <tim.lewis@insyde.com <mailto:tim.lewis@insyde.com> > wrote:
Following up on my last e-mail, I guess I had the wrong assumption: there doesn’t appear to be a way to resolve mappings within StdLib.
Are there any plans here?
Thanks,
Tim
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6721 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-05 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <15C19AC418D00FDA.11246@groups.io>
2019-09-05 20:06 ` Tim Lewis [this message]
2019-09-05 0:14 Mappings and StdLib Tim Lewis
2019-09-05 0:35 ` [edk2-devel] " Andrew Fish
2019-09-05 17:25 ` Tim Lewis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='05a701d56425$590a9150$0b1fb3f0$@insyde.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox