From: "Shi, Steven" <steven.shi@intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"afish@apple.com" <afish@apple.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] BaseTools-GenFw:Add new x86_64 Elf relocation types for PIC/PIE code
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:28:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06C8AB66E78EE34A949939824ABE2B310338261D@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-MxNWQNnUdPrOEPWR+CqTjyYySs=tbq7BYRiqhEVRXFg@mail.gmail.com>
> On 1 August 2016 at 09:54, Shi, Steven <steven.shi@intel.com> wrote:
> >> On 1 August 2016 at 09:19, Shi, Steven
> <steven.shi@intel.com<mailto:steven.shi@intel.com>> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The fact that it works does not make it safe. Having multiple fixups
> >> >> >> for the same symbol in the .reloc section is a problem, and so is
> >> >> >> reapplying GOTPCRELX to places where the original instruction has
> >> been
> >> >> >> replaced by the linker.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > [Steven]: I still don't understand why there will be multiple fixups for
> the
> >> >> same symbol in the .reloc section?
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Remember this example
> >> >>
> >> >> >> > int n;
> >> >> >> > int f () { return n; }
> >> >> >> > int g () { return n; }
> >> >> >> > int h () { return n; }
> >> >>
> >> >> If every 'return n' results in a GOTPCREL relocation, how are you
> >> >> going to make sure that the GOT entry for 'n' is only fixed up a
> >> >> single time?
> >> >
> >> > [Steven]: the 'return n' will not result in relocation, but the 'int n' will
> result
> >> in the relocation in GOT. The three 'return n' will point to the same 'int n'
> >> relocation item. So, we need only fixup 'int n' once, all three 'return n' will
> >> use the correct global 'n' value.
> >>
> >> Every 'return n' will result in a GOTPCREL relocation against n. And
> >> your code emits a relocation for the GOT entry every time.
> >>
> > [Steven]: I don't think so. please give a real case and offer its source code
> to prove " Every 'return n' will result in a GOTPCREL relocation against n ".
> >
>
> Compiling the code above using
>
> gcc -c -O -fpic /tmp/pie.c -o pie.o
>
> and dumping it using
>
> readelf -r pie.o
>
> gives me
>
> Relocation section '.rela.text' at offset 0x250 contains 3 entries:
> Offset Info Type Sym. Value Sym. Name + Addend
> 000000000003 000a0000002a R_X86_64_REX_GOTP 0000000000000004 n -
> 4
> 00000000000d 000a0000002a R_X86_64_REX_GOTP 0000000000000004 n -
> 4
> 000000000017 000a0000002a R_X86_64_REX_GOTP 0000000000000004 n -
> 4
> ...
[Steven]: In this example, the pie.o is just the object file which is not linked. And if you link this pie.o file, the linker will solve all these three R_X86_64_REX_GOTP symbol with same 'int n' symbol address, and will create only one relocation item for 'int n' in the linked executable relocation section. So, we only need fixup once for the 'int n' in the linked executable.
Thanks
Steven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-01 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1467967364-11556-1-git-send-email-steven.shi@intel.com>
[not found] ` <1467967364-11556-3-git-send-email-steven.shi@intel.com>
2016-07-30 9:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] BaseTools-GenFw:Add new x86_64 Elf relocation types for PIC/PIE code Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-30 14:09 ` Shi, Steven
2016-07-30 14:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-31 3:08 ` Shi, Steven
2016-07-31 5:42 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-31 19:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-01 4:39 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-01 5:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-01 6:13 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-01 6:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-01 7:19 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-01 7:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-01 7:54 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-01 8:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-01 8:28 ` Shi, Steven [this message]
[not found] ` <06C8AB66E78EE34A949939824ABE2B31033825EE@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu80u+CJLVtD5tTo5RrJb7LH0Qfnbj=7b7NUqrbf2aOPrA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <06C8AB66E78EE34A949939824ABE2B31033826FE@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu9MSisR1T_jr=DNyCs24We5=2vUgQZJ9t_rZmCYC8qvHg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <06C8AB66E78EE34A949939824ABE2B310338275F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-08-01 10:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-02 11:40 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-02 12:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-03 20:13 ` Jordan Justen
2016-08-03 20:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-03 20:53 ` Jordan Justen
2016-08-03 20:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-03 23:26 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-03 20:55 ` Nicolas Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06C8AB66E78EE34A949939824ABE2B310338261D@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox