From: "Leif Lindholm" <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
To: <devel@edk2.groups.io>, <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"rfc@edk2.groups.io" <rfc@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Andrew Fish (afish@apple.com)" <afish@apple.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Proposal to switch TianoCore Code Review from email to GitHub Pull Requests on 5-24-2024
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 19:12:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <076697e5-a594-40a7-8100-767d6a2f7520@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB49295D09CD04BBC97AC27613D2192@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2024-05-01 18:43, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose that TianoCore move all code review from email
> based code reviews to GitHub Pull Requests based code reviews.
>
> The proposed date to switch would be immediately after the next stable
> tag which is currently scheduled for May 24, 2024.
Thanks Mike.
I'm in favour of this change, and the date.
I still want us to try to figure out how to retain review history beyond
what github decides we need, but I don't think it justifies indefinitely
delaying the switchover. And frankly, it will be easier to experiment
with what works and not after the switch.
/
Leif
> Updates to the following Wiki page would be required to describe the
> required process when using GitHub Pull Requests for all code review
> related activity.
>
> https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Development-Process
>
> A couple examples of the changes that would need to be documented are:
>
> * All contributors, maintainers, and reviewers must have GitHub IDs.
> * The commit message would no longer require Cc:, Reviewed-by:, Acked-by:
> or Tested-by: tags. The only required tag would be Signed-off-by.
> * The Pull Request submitter is required to invite the required
> maintainers and reviewers to the pull request. This is the same
> set of maintainers and reviewers that are required to be listed in
> Cc: tags in today's process.
> * Maintainers are responsible for verifying that all conversations in
> the code review are resolved and that all review approvals from the
> required set of maintainers are present before setting the 'push' label.
>
>
> Please provide feedback
> 1) If you are not in favor of this change.
> 2) If you are not in favor of the proposed date of this change.
> 3) On the process changes you would like to see documented in the Wiki
> pages related to using GitHub Pull Request based code reviews.
>
> There is some prototype work to automate/simplify some of the PR based
> code review process steps. Those could be added over time as resources
> are available to finish and support them.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#118469): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118469
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105847510/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-01 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-01 17:43 [edk2-devel] Proposal to switch TianoCore Code Review from email to GitHub Pull Requests on 5-24-2024 Michael D Kinney
2024-05-01 18:12 ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2024-05-01 23:19 ` Dionna Glaze via groups.io
2024-05-02 15:59 ` Brian J. Johnson
2024-05-02 16:09 ` Dionna Glaze via groups.io
2024-05-02 16:30 ` [edk2-rfc] " Michael D Kinney
2024-05-06 16:41 ` Leara, William via groups.io
2024-05-02 1:28 ` Rebecca Cran
2024-05-02 10:21 ` Leif Lindholm
2024-05-02 3:08 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-02 10:57 ` Leif Lindholm
2024-05-02 16:37 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-03 16:58 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-03 16:54 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-02 6:33 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2024-05-02 10:34 ` Leif Lindholm
2024-05-02 15:21 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-02 16:24 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-03 17:21 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-03 19:16 ` [edk2-rfc] " Michael D Kinney
2024-05-02 9:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-05-02 15:14 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-03 0:35 ` [edk2-rfc] " Rebecca Cran
2024-05-02 17:50 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-05-02 18:17 ` [edk2-rfc] " Michael D Kinney
2024-05-03 17:38 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-05-03 20:12 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-03 20:38 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-04 0:57 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-05 18:10 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-05-06 10:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-05-06 15:11 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-06 15:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-05-06 15:56 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-06 16:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-05-10 20:57 ` Brian J. Johnson
2024-05-15 17:03 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-24 12:20 ` [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] " Rebecca Cran
2024-05-24 14:53 ` Michael Kubacki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=076697e5-a594-40a7-8100-767d6a2f7520@quicinc.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox