From: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Cohen, Eugene" <eugene@hp.com>,
"Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: deal with allocations spanning several memmap entries
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 03:45:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103B83549F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8HgGYfXhtM2LNYdnCrWaBfv77p-AjY8bZfBQ3Om6Tdiw@mail.gmail.com>
Ard,
In fact the first half should be like below if it needs to be there, right?
Entry->Start > End => Entry->Start > (End + 1)
Anyway, I agree the comments "The first half of the expression can be dropped" you supplemented.
With the first half of the expression dropped, Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Thanks,
Star
-----Original Message-----
From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 9:19 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; Cohen, Eugene <eugene@hp.com>; Tian, Feng <feng.tian@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: deal with allocations spanning several memmap entries
On 16 March 2017 at 11:35, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> When attempting to perform page allocations using AllocateAddress, we
> fail to check whether the entire region is free before splitting the
> region. This may lead to memory being leaked further into the routine,
> when it turns out that one of the memory map entries intersected by
> the region is already occupied. In this case, prior conversions are
> not rolled back.
>
> For instance, starting from this situation
>
> 0x000040000000-0x00004007ffff [ConventionalMemory ]
> 0x000040080000-0x00004009ffff [Boot Data ]
> 0x0000400a0000-0x000047ffffff [ConventionalMemory ]
>
> a failed EfiLoaderData allocation @ 0x40000000 that covers the
> BootData region will fail, but leave the first part of the allocation
> converted, so we end up with
>
> 0x000040000000-0x00004007ffff [Loader Data ]
> 0x000040080000-0x00004009ffff [Boot Data ]
> 0x0000400a0000-0x000047ffffff [ConventionalMemory ]
>
> even though the AllocatePages() call returned an error.
>
> So let's check beforehand that AllocateAddress allocations are covered
> by a single memory map entry, so that it either succeeds or fails
> completely, rather than leaking allocations.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> index 260a30a214c7..92306b2f1b45 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> @@ -755,6 +755,17 @@ CoreConvertPagesEx (
> }
>
> //
> + // If we are converting the type of the range from EfiConventionalMemory to
> + // another type, we have to ensure that the entire range is covered by a
> + // single entry.
> + //
> + if (ChangingType && (NewType != EfiConventionalMemory)) {
> + if (Entry->Start > End || Entry->End < End) {
I guess this expression is slightly bogus: we know entry [Entry->Start, Entry->End) covers Start, and so the only way the entry could fail to cover [Start, End) is when Entry->End < End. The first half of the expression can be dropped since it can never be true
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR | DEBUG_PAGE, "ConvertPages: range %lx - %lx covers multiple entries\n", Start, End));
> + return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
> + }
> + }
> + //
> // Convert range to the end, or to the end of the descriptor
> // if that's all we've got
> //
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-17 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 11:35 [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: deal with allocations spanning several memmap entries Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-16 13:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-17 3:45 ` Zeng, Star [this message]
2017-03-17 18:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103B83549F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox