From: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
To: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com)" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg/VTdDxe: Change EBS Event TPL to CALLBACK.
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 06:54:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103B9AE4D0@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503AA04F32@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Ok, please add more description into the commit log, for example, "PCI device should disable BME at NOTIFY", etc.
With that, Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Thanks,
Star
-----Original Message-----
From: Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 2:51 PM
To: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com) <lersek@redhat.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg/VTdDxe: Change EBS Event TPL to CALLBACK.
Yes, this PCI patch will be submitted soon. :)
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 2:18 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com) <lersek@redhat.com>; Zeng, Star
> <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg/VTdDxe: Change EBS Event TPL to CALLBACK.
>
> So there will be a guidance for this " PCI device disable BME at
> NOTIFY " to be documented?
>
> Thanks,
> Star
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 2:03 PM
> To: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com) <lersek@redhat.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg/VTdDxe: Change EBS Event TPL to CALLBACK.
>
> Right. In the future, we will let PCI device disable BME at NOTIFY.
>
> So we let IOMMU use CALLBACK, to make sure BME is disabled before
> IOMMU is disabled.
>
> Thank you
> Yao Jiewen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zeng, Star
> > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 1:55 PM
> > To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com) <lersek@redhat.com>; Zeng, Star
> > <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg/VTdDxe: Change EBS Event TPL to
> CALLBACK.
> >
> > I am confused.
> >
> > Is this patch to make the device driver's EBS event notification to
> > be run before IntelVTdDxe's EBS event notification?
> >
> > If yes, this patch seemingly can only make sure the behavior when
> > the device driver's EBS event notification is at NOTIFY, but not CALLBACK.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Star
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yao, Jiewen
> > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 1:16 PM
> > To: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com) <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg/VTdDxe: Change EBS Event TPL to
> CALLBACK.
> >
> > That is fine.
> >
> > Here, disabling IOMMU means to disable the protection and allow all
> > DMA access.
> > I do not think it will bring any functional impact.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Yao Jiewen
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Zeng, Star
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 12:58 PM
> > > To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > Cc: Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com) <lersek@redhat.com>; Zeng,
> > > Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg/VTdDxe: Change EBS Event TPL
> > > to
> > CALLBACK.
> > >
> > > Some device driver may also have exit boot service event at
> > > CALLBACK, for example AtaPassThruExitBootServices() that was added
> > > by
> Laszlo.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Star
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Yao, Jiewen
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 10:14 AM
> > > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > Cc: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg/VTdDxe: Change EBS Event TPL to CALLBACK.
> > >
> > > Change ExitBootServices TPL to CALLBACK, so that a device can
> > > disable BME before IOMMU grants access right.
> > >
> > > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/DmaProtection.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/DmaProtection.c
> > > b/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/DmaProtection.c
> > > index f5de01f..4a4d82e 100644
> > > --- a/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/DmaProtection.c
> > > +++ b/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/DmaProtection.c
> > > @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ InitializeDmaProtection (
> > >
> > > Status = gBS->CreateEventEx (
> > > EVT_NOTIFY_SIGNAL,
> > > - TPL_NOTIFY,
> > > + TPL_CALLBACK,
> > > OnExitBootServices,
> > > NULL,
> > > &gEfiEventExitBootServicesGuid, @@ -492,7
> > > +492,7 @@ InitializeDmaProtection (
> > > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> > >
> > > Status = EfiCreateEventLegacyBootEx (
> > > - TPL_NOTIFY,
> > > + TPL_CALLBACK,
> > > OnLegacyBoot,
> > > NULL,
> > > &LegacyBootEvent
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-26 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-26 2:13 [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg/VTdDxe: Change EBS Event TPL to CALLBACK Jiewen Yao
2017-10-26 4:58 ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-26 5:15 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-26 5:55 ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-26 6:03 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-26 6:18 ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-26 6:50 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-26 6:54 ` Zeng, Star [this message]
2017-10-26 6:55 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-26 7:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-26 8:10 ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-26 13:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-26 13:36 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-26 15:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-27 0:34 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-27 0:53 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-10-27 1:47 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-27 2:37 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-10-27 3:50 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-27 16:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-28 5:15 ` Yao, Jiewen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103B9AE4D0@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox