public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
To: 'Julien Grall' <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	"heyi.guo@linaro.org" <heyi.guo@linaro.org>,
	"Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Xen Console input very slow in recent UEFI
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 03:20:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103B9AEB7F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b35494dc-6fa1-5d2a-7e64-eea97b4f85b0@linaro.org>

Hi,

The TimeOut handling in SerialRead() in SerialDxe(MdeModulepkg), IsaSerialRead() in IsaSerialDxe(IntelFrameworkModulePkg) and  SerialRead() in PciSioSerialDxe(MdeModulePkg) are consistent, and we did not see this kind of "slow down" before.

After some investigation, I found it is related to the Timeout value.

The Timeout is 1000000 (1s) by default to follow UEFI spec. And the Terminal driver will recalculate and set the Timeout value based on the properties of UART in TerminalDriverBindingStart()/TerminalConInTimerHandler().

    SerialInTimeOut = 0;
    if (Mode->BaudRate != 0) {
      //
      // According to BAUD rate to calculate the timeout value.
      //
      SerialInTimeOut = (1 + Mode->DataBits + Mode->StopBits) * 2 * 1000000 / (UINTN) Mode->BaudRate;
    }

For example, based on the PCD values of PcdUartDefaultBaudRate, PcdUartDefaultDataBits and PcdUartDefaultStopBits, SerialInTimeOut = (1 + 8  + 1) * 2 * 1000000 / (UINTN) 115200 = 173 (us).

When SerialDxe is used,
TerminalDriverBindingStart()/TerminalConInTimerHandler() ->
  SerialIo->SetAttributes() ->
    SerialSetAttributes() ->
      SerialPortSetAttributes()

Some implementations of SerialPortSetAttributes() could handle the input parameters and return RETURN_SUCCESS, for example BaseSerialPortLib16550, then Timeout value will be changed to 173 (us), no "slow down" will be observed.
But some implementations of SerialPortSetAttributes() just return RETURN_UNSUPPORTED, for example XenConsoleSerialPortLib, then Timeout value will be not changed and kept to be 1000000 (1s), "slow down" will be observed.

Here, how about to?
1. Handle the input parameters and return status accordingly instead of just returning RETURN_UNSUPPORTED in SerialPortSetAttributes().
2. Just return RETURN_SUCCESS instead of RETURN_UNSUPPORTED in SerialPortSetAttributes() if the instance does not care the input parameters at all.

And SerialDxe may can be enhanced like below to be more robust.

==========
6ec9c40f91fc675ee77f3e54aea4e5a41a2de504
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/SerialDxe/SerialIo.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/SerialDxe/SerialIo.c b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/SerialDxe/SerialIo.c
index ebcd92726314..060ea56c2b1a 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/SerialDxe/SerialIo.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/SerialDxe/SerialIo.c
@@ -285,7 +285,21 @@ SerialSetAttributes (
 
   Status = SerialPortSetAttributes (&BaudRate, &ReceiveFifoDepth, &Timeout, &Parity, &DataBits, &StopBits);
   if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
-    return Status;
+    //
+    // If it is just to set Timeout value and unsupported is returned,
+    // do not return error.
+    //
+    if ((Status == EFI_UNSUPPORTED) &&
+        (This->Mode->Timeout          != Timeout) &&
+        (This->Mode->ReceiveFifoDepth == ReceiveFifoDepth) &&
+        (This->Mode->BaudRate         == BaudRate) &&
+        (This->Mode->DataBits         == (UINT32) DataBits) &&
+        (This->Mode->Parity           == (UINT32) Parity) &&
+        (This->Mode->StopBits         == (UINT32) StopBits)) {
+      Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
+    } else {
+      return Status;
+    }
   }
 
   //
====================


Thanks,
Star

-----Original Message-----
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Julien Grall
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 2:32 AM
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; heyi.guo@linaro.org; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>; Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [edk2] Xen Console input very slow in recent UEFI

Hi Laszlo,

Thank you for your help.

On 26/10/17 16:20, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/26/17 17:13, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Hello Julien,
>>
>> On 10/26/17 13:05, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I was doing more testing of UEFI in Xen guests and noticed some slow 
>>> down when using the shell. The characters are only echoed after a 
>>> second or two that is a bit annoying.
>>>
>>> The change that introduced this issue is 4cf3f37c87 "MdeModulePkg
>>> SerialDxe: Process timeout consistently in SerialRead".
>>>
>>> The Serial Driver for Xen PV console is very simple (see 
>>> OvmfPkg/Library/XenConsoleSerialPortLib). So I am not sure where the 
>>> root cause is.
>>>
>>> Would anyone have any tips on it?
>>
>> The exact same issue has been encountered earlier under QEMU, please 
>> refer to the following sub-thread (please read it to end):
>>
>> http://mid.mail-archive.com/b748580c-cb51-32c9-acf9-780841ef15da@redh
>> at.com
>>
>> The fix was commit 5f0f5e90ae8c ("ArmVirtPkg/FdtPL011SerialPortLib: 
>> call PL011UartLib in all SerialPortLib APIs", 2017-08-16).
>>
>> I think if you can implement the same for XenConsoleSerialPortLib, 
>> that should return to working state as well.
> 
> Hmmm, wait, at a closer look, it looks like
> 
>    OvmfPkg/Library/XenConsoleSerialPortLib/XenConsoleSerialPortLib.c
> 
> already implements that suggestion? (I.e., it sets 
> EFI_SERIAL_INPUT_BUFFER_EMPTY in *Control as necessary?)
> 
> Are we sure the SerialPortPoll() function works correctly? I don't see 
> any MemoryFence() calls in SerialPortPoll(), around checking the 
> fields in (*mXenConsoleInterface). Could that be the problem?

I am not entirely sure. But I added a couple of MemoryFence() in SerialPort just in case to clear that from potential cause:

XENCONS_RING_IDX  Consumer, Producer;

if (!mXenConsoleInterface) {
     return FALSE;
}

MemoryFence ();

Consumer = mXenConsoleInterface->in_cons; Producer = mXenConsoleInterface->in_prod;

MemoryFence ();

return Consumer != Producer;

I also added some debug printk (using a different interface) to confirm the value of Consumer and Producer are valid.  I can see the Producer increasing every time a key is pressed and then soon followed by SerialPortRead incrementing Consumer.

I did more debugging and find out the following is happening in TerminalConInTimerHandler (MdeModulePkg/Universal/Console/TerminalDxe)
when a character is received:

   1) GetControl will return EFI_SERIAL_INPUT_BUFFER_EMPTY unset
      	=> Entering in the loop to fetch character from the serial
   2) GetOneKeyFromSerial()
	=> Return directly with the character read
   3) Looping as the fifo is not full and no error
   4) GetOneKeyFromSerial() -> SerialRead()
   	=> No more character so SerialPortPoll() will return FALSE and loop until timeout
	=> Return EFI_TIMEOUT
   5) Exiting the loop from TerminalConInTimerHandler
   6) Characters are printed

So the step 4) will introduce the timeout seen and delay the echoing of the characters received.

I could see a couple of solutions to fix it:
	1) Remove the timeout from SerialPortRead and rely on either
		a) caller to handle timeout
		b) each UART driver
	2) TerminalConInTimerHandler to check at every iteration whether the buffer is empty.

Any other ideas?

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-27  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-26 11:05 Xen Console input very slow in recent UEFI Julien Grall
2017-10-26 15:13 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-26 15:20   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-26 18:31     ` Julien Grall
2017-10-27  3:20       ` Zeng, Star [this message]
2017-10-27 12:38         ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-27 13:19           ` Julien Grall
2017-10-27 15:43             ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-30  1:09               ` Zeng, Star
2017-11-01 12:46                 ` Julien Grall
2017-11-02  1:43                   ` Zeng, Star

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103B9AEB7F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox