public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Filter out all paging capabilities
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:28:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103B9B62E6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9jqYXVy7h18tiOoSJj_xoxouep7SkVcATMwBJ6s7dV7w@mail.gmail.com>

Ard,

EFI_MEMORY_WP is for cache.

UefiSpec.h
//
// Note: UEFI spec 2.5 and following: use EFI_MEMORY_RO as write-protected physical memory
// protection attribute. Also, EFI_MEMORY_WP means cacheability attribute.
//
#define EFI_MEMORY_WP               0x0000000000001000ULL

Thanks,
Star
-----Original Message-----
From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org] 
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 5:25 PM
To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Filter out all paging capabilities

On 16 November 2017 at 07:26, Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com> wrote:
> Some OSs will treat EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute as really set 
> attributes and change memory paging attribute accordingly.
> But current EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute is assigned by value from 
> Capabilities in GCD memory map. This might cause boot problems. 
> Clearing all paging related capabilities can workaround it. The code 
> added in this patch is supposed to be removed once the usage of 
> EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute is clarified in UEFI spec and adopted 
> by both EDK-II Core and all supported OSs.
>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c 
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> index c9219cc068..783b576e35 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> @@ -1829,6 +1829,23 @@ CoreGetMemoryMap (
>    //
>    BufferSize = ((UINT8 *)MemoryMap - (UINT8 *)MemoryMapStart);
>
> +  //
> +  // WORKAROUND: Some OSs will treat EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute as really
> +  //             set attributes and change memory paging attribute accordingly.
> +  //             But current EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute is assigned by
> +  //             value from Capabilities in GCD memory map. This might cause
> +  //             boot problems. Clearing all paging related capabilities can
> +  //             workaround it. Following code is supposed to be removed once
> +  //             the usage of EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute is clarified in
> +  //             UEFI spec and adopted by both EDK-II Core and all supported
> +  //             OSs.
> +  //
> +  while (MemoryMapStart < MemoryMap) {
> +    MemoryMapStart->Attribute &= ~(UINT64)(EFI_MEMORY_RP | EFI_MEMORY_RO |
> +                                           EFI_MEMORY_XP);

Why is EFI_MEMORY_WP missing here?

> +    MemoryMapStart = NEXT_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR(MemoryMapStart, Size);  }
> +
>    Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
>
>  Done:
> --
> 2.14.1.windows.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-16  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-16  7:26 [PATCH v6 0/2] Fix multiple entries of RT_CODE in memory map Jian J Wang
2017-11-16  7:26 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Filter out all paging capabilities Jian J Wang
2017-11-16  9:24   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-16  9:28     ` Zeng, Star [this message]
2017-11-16  9:29       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-16  9:48         ` Zeng, Star
2017-11-16 16:06           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-17  1:37   ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-11-17  2:48     ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-22  7:30       ` Zeng, Star
2017-11-20 20:23   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-11-21  6:29     ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-16  7:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: Fix multiple entries of RT_CODE in memory map Jian J Wang
2017-11-20 20:31   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-11-21  6:51     ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-22  7:54   ` Zeng, Star
2017-11-20 21:08 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103B9B62E6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox