public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dong, Guo" <guo.dong@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"Ma, Maurice" <maurice.ma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiPayloadPkg: Enhance UEFI payload for coreboot and Slim Bootloader
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:07:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0DE6ECBAEEB99B4DA9564FF580F3580A47DED9B1@fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C0A2E99@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>


Hi Ray,

Yes, the new UefiPayload will not require legacy 8254 timer.
And we could remove Coreboot packages after UefiPayloadPkg check in.

Thanks,
Guo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ray
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:15 PM
> To: Dong, Guo <guo.dong@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Laszlo Ersek
> <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiPayloadPkg: Enhance UEFI payload for
> coreboot and Slim Bootloader
> 
> 
> Guo,
> Just to double confirm: UefiPayloadPkg will not require Legacy8254 timer
> support.
> The old packages Coreboot*Pkgs will be removed.
> Which means now only QEMU/OVMF needs the Legacy8254 support.
> 
> Laszlo,
> Now since QEMU/OVMF is the only consumer of the Legacy8254 driver, do
> you agree that the Legacy8254 is moved to OvmfPkg?
> Note: We agreed that Legacy8259 will be moved to OvmfPkg/Csm directory
> and that decision is not going to be changed by this new situation.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ray
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: edk2-devel <edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org> On Behalf Of Guo
> > Dong
> > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 8:34 AM
> > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiPayloadPkg: Enhance UEFI payload for
> > coreboot and Slim Bootloader
> >
> > CorebootModulePkg and CorebootPayloadPkg originally supports coreboot
> > only.
> > In order to support other bootloaders, such as Slim Bootloader, they
> > need be updated to be more generic.
> > UEFI Payload (UefiPayloadPkg) a converged package from
> > CorebootModulePkg and CorebootPayloadPkg with following updates:
> > a. Support both coreboot and Slim Bootloader b. Removed
> > SataControllerDxe and BaseSerialPortLib16550 to use EDK2 modules c.
> > Support passing bootloader parameter to UEFI payload, e.g. coreboot
> >    table from coreboot or HOB list from Slim Bootloader d. Using
> > GraphicsOutputDxe from EDK2 with minor change instead of FbGop e.
> > Remove the dependency to IntelFrameworkPkg and
> IntelFrameworkModulePkg
> >    and QuarkSocPkg
> > f. Use BaseDebugLibSerialPort library as DebugLib g. Use HPET timer,
> > drop legacy 8254 timer support h. Use BaseXApicX2ApicLib instead of
> > BaseXApicLib i. Other clean ups
> >
> > On how UefiPayloadPkg could work with coreboot/Slim Bootloader, please
> > refer UefiPayloadPkg/BuildAndIntegrationInstructions.txt
> >
> > Once UefiPayloadPkg is checked-in, CorebootModulePkg and
> > CorebootPayloadPkg could be retired.
> >
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Dong <guo.dong@intel.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-29 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-29  0:33 [PATCH] UefiPayloadPkg: Enhance UEFI payload for coreboot and Slim Bootloader Guo Dong
2019-03-29  5:15 ` Ni, Ray
2019-03-29 15:07   ` Dong, Guo [this message]
2019-04-01 14:05   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-02  1:53     ` Wu, Hao A
2019-04-03 14:13 ` Ma, Maurice
     [not found]   ` <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C0E0C06@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2019-04-11 15:38     ` Ma, Maurice
2019-04-11 15:58       ` Guo Dong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-11 15:03 Guo Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0DE6ECBAEEB99B4DA9564FF580F3580A47DED9B1@fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox