Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: refactor hotplug logic

["Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>]

On 01/26/21 22:17, Ankur Arora wrote:
> On 2021-01-26 1:07 p.m., Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 01/26/21 20:15, Ankur Arora wrote:
>>> On 2021-01-26 11:01 a.m., Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
>>>> I'll continue the review later this week.
>>>
>>> Acking the comments above.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>> Meanwhile let me reprocess the series in light of the comments above.
>>
>> I'm at such a point now, during the v5 review, that I think I can easily
>> re-sync.
>>
>> In general, I don't mind the posting of a new version of a series
>> mid-review, *IF* we agree about it in advance.
>>
>> If you prefer to post a v6, for addressing the comments I've made thus
>> far, I'm OK with that. If you'd like me to continue reviewing v5, I'm
>> also OK with that.
>>
>> So it's up to you -- please state your decision, so that I know if I
>> should proceed with v5 (later this week), or wait for v6.
> 
> I think I would prefer to send v6. Looking at the v5 comments so far, I'm
> sure that there's a lot of non conforming coding style issues.
> Addressing them now (or at least a hopefully significant subset) would
> probably save time.

I agree; thank you.

(And, for all the yelling that ECC does, I'm really surprised it didn't
catch the "missing space between function designator and opening paren"
wart!)

> I'm looking at sending these out by Thursday morning PT, and given that
> you plan to continue later this week, sounds like it might not lose too
> much review time either.

Yes, that should work fine.

Thank you, Ankur!
Laszlo