public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, rsingh@ventanamicro.com
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	Veeresh Sangolli <veeresh.sangolli@dellteam.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix DEADCODE Coverity issue
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 17:21:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c88e9d0-ad1d-9b9d-7bbc-90cee40752e3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231107061959.113213-2-rsingh@ventanamicro.com>

On 11/7/23 07:19, Ranbir Singh wrote:
> From: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
> 
> The function PciHotPlugRequestNotify has two if blocks towards the end
> of function both containing return. Due to the parameter checks ensured
> at the beginning of the function, one of the two if blocks is bound to
> come in execution flow. Hence, the return EFI_SUCCESS; at line 2112 is
> redundant/deadcode.

Agree with the analysis.

> 
> To fix it, either of line 2109 or 2112 can be deleted.
> 
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4239
> 
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Co-authored-by: Veeresh Sangolli <veeresh.sangolli@dellteam.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciEnumerator.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciEnumerator.c b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciEnumerator.c
> index 3f8c6e6da7dc..5b71e152f3ea 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciEnumerator.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciEnumerator.c
> @@ -2106,7 +2106,6 @@ PciHotPlugRequestNotify (
>      //
>      // End for
>      //
> -    return EFI_SUCCESS;
>    }
>  
>    return EFI_SUCCESS;

Disagree with the fix.

Given the checks on "Operation" at the top of the function, the
condition (near the end of the function)

  if (Operation == EfiPciHotplugRequestRemove) {

will always evaluate to TRUE. (Operation can be only Add or Remove, and
if it is Add, then we don't reach this location.)

Therefore, we should remove this condition, and *unnest* the dependent
logic.

As a result of *that*, you'll have

  return EFI_SUCCESS;
  return EFI_SUCCESS;

at the end of the function, and *then* you should remove either one of them.

Thanks
Laszlo



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110862): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/110862
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102438298/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/12367111/7686176/1913456212/xyzzy [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-07 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-07  6:19 [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] BZ 4239: Fix MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe issues pointed by Coverity Ranbir Singh
2023-11-07  6:19 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix DEADCODE Coverity issue Ranbir Singh
2023-11-07 16:21   ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2023-11-10  6:14     ` Ranbir Singh
2023-11-07  6:19 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix MISSING_BREAK Coverity issues Ranbir Singh
2023-11-07  8:15   ` Ni, Ray
2023-11-07 16:23   ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-07 17:59     ` Michael D Kinney
2023-11-08  3:51       ` Ranbir Singh
2023-11-08  4:05         ` Michael D Kinney
2023-11-08  4:29           ` Ranbir Singh
2023-11-13 11:24             ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-07  6:19 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix ARRAY_VS_SINGLETON " Ranbir Singh
2023-11-07 16:41   ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-10  5:59     ` Ranbir Singh
2023-11-07  6:19 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix NULL_RETURNS Coverity issue Ranbir Singh
2023-11-07 16:48   ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-10  6:11     ` Ranbir Singh
2023-11-13 11:28       ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-14 15:08         ` Ranbir Singh
2023-11-14 16:21           ` Michael D Kinney
2023-11-14 16:53             ` Ranbir Singh
2023-11-15 10:02               ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-14 19:37             ` Michael Kubacki
2023-11-15 10:10               ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-20 14:05                 ` Michael Kubacki
2023-11-15  9:50             ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-20  3:57               ` Ranbir Singh
2023-11-21 17:07                 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-07  6:19 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix UNUSED_VALUE Coverity issues Ranbir Singh
2023-11-07 17:20   ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-10  6:31     ` Ranbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0c88e9d0-ad1d-9b9d-7bbc-90cee40752e3@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox