Hi Ray,


Thanks,
Chao
On 2024/2/2 11:30, Ni, Ray wrote:
> 1. Most of INF changes are not necessary for x86. Can you avoid them?
I just sorted them alphabetically, do you think it is unnecessary? If 
so, I will remove the changes in other patches in next time.
>
>> +  ## This PCD Contains the pointer to a CPU exception vector base address.
>> +  # @Prompt The pointer to a CPU exception vector base address.
>> +
>> gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuExceptionVectorBaseAddress|0x0|UINT
>> 64|0x60000022
>> +
> 2. I do not see any reference to the above PCD in source/INF files.
> Any mistake here?
This PCD is used in CpuDxe and MmuLib, among others. Do you think this 
change should be made as a separate patch?
>
>
>
> 
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#115013): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/115013
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103971651/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-