* [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
@ 2018-01-31 7:00 Song, BinX
2018-01-31 7:41 ` Song, BinX
2018-01-31 9:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Song, BinX @ 2018-01-31 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; +Cc: Dong, Eric, lersek@redhat.com
Current CPU feature dependency check will hang on when meet below or
similar case:
if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
"AESNI",
AesniGetConfigData,
AesniSupport,
AesniInitialize,
CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
CPU_FEATURE_END
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
}
if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
"MWAIT",
NULL,
MonitorMwaitSupport,
MonitorMwaitInitialize,
CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
CPU_FEATURE_END
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
}
Solution is to separate current CPU feature dependency check into
sort and check two parts.
Sort function:
According to CPU feature's dependency, sort all CPU features.
Later dependency will override previous dependency if they are conflicted.
Check function:
Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid relationship.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.song@intel.com>
---
.../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 271 ++++++++++++++++++++-
.../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h | 7 +
.../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 130 +---------
3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
index 4d75c07..2fd0d5f 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
@@ -423,6 +423,271 @@ DumpRegisterTableOnProcessor (
}
/**
+ From FeatureBitMask, find the right feature entry in CPU feature list.
+
+ @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
+ @param[in] CurrentFeature The pointer to current CPU feature.
+ @param[in] BeforeFlag TRUE: BeforeFeatureBitMask; FALSE: AfterFeatureBitMask.
+
+ @return The pointer to right CPU feature entry.
+**/
+LIST_ENTRY *
+FindFeatureInList(
+ IN LIST_ENTRY *CpuFeatureList,
+ IN CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentCpuFeature,
+ IN BOOLEAN BeforeFlag
+ )
+{
+ LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
+ CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *TempFeature;
+ UINT8 *FeatureBitMask;
+
+ FeatureBitMask = BeforeFlag ? CurrentCpuFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask : CurrentCpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask;
+ TempEntry = GetFirstNode (CpuFeatureList);
+ while (!IsNull (CpuFeatureList, TempEntry)) {
+ TempFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (TempEntry);
+ if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (FeatureBitMask, TempFeature->FeatureMask)){
+ return TempEntry;
+ }
+ TempEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
+ }
+
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a ", CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName, BeforeFlag ? "before ":"after ", "condition is invalid!\n"));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Please check %a relationship!\n", CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName));
+ ASSERT (FALSE);
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/**
+ In CPU feature list, check if one entry is before another entry.
+
+ @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
+ @param[in] OneEntry The pointer to current CPU feature entry.
+ @param[in] AnotherEntry The pointer to checked CPU feature entry.
+
+ @return TRUE One entry is before another entry.
+ @return FALSE One entry is NOT before another entry.
+**/
+BOOLEAN
+CheckEntryBeforeEntry(
+ IN LIST_ENTRY *CpuFeatureList,
+ IN LIST_ENTRY *OneEntry,
+ IN LIST_ENTRY *AnotherEntry
+ )
+{
+ LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
+
+ TempEntry = OneEntry;
+ while (!IsNull (CpuFeatureList, TempEntry)) {
+ if (IsNull (AnotherEntry, TempEntry)) {
+ return TRUE;
+ }
+ TempEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
+ }
+ return FALSE;
+}
+
+/**
+ Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid one.
+
+ @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
+**/
+VOID
+CheckCpuFeaturesRelationShip (
+ IN LIST_ENTRY *FeatureList
+ )
+{
+ LIST_ENTRY *CurrentEntry;
+ CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentFeature;
+ LIST_ENTRY *CheckEntry;
+ CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CheckFeature;
+
+ //
+ // From head to tail, one by one to check all CPU features.
+ //
+ CurrentEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
+ while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CurrentEntry)) {
+ CurrentFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CurrentEntry);
+ ASSERT (CurrentFeature->Sorted);
+ if (CurrentFeature->BeforeAll) {
+ CheckEntry = CurrentEntry->BackLink;
+ while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CheckEntry)) {
+ CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
+ //
+ // Check all features before this entry,
+ // ASSERT when feature has no BeforeAll flag.
+ //
+ if (!CheckFeature->BeforeAll){
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a before all is invalid!\n", CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Please check %a relationship!\n", CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
+ ASSERT (FALSE);
+ }
+ CheckEntry = CheckEntry->BackLink;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (CurrentFeature->AfterAll) {
+ CheckEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
+ while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CheckEntry)) {
+ CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
+ //
+ // Check all features after this entry,
+ // ASSERT when feature has no AfterAll flag.
+ //
+ if(!CheckFeature->AfterAll){
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a after all is invalid!\n", CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Please check %a relationship!\n", CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
+ ASSERT (FALSE);
+ }
+ CheckEntry = CheckEntry->ForwardLink;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (CurrentFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
+ //
+ // Get correct feature entry in feature list.
+ //
+ CheckEntry = FindFeatureInList (FeatureList, CurrentFeature, TRUE);
+ //
+ // ASSERT when current feature's relationship is invalid.
+ //
+ if (!CheckEntryBeforeEntry(FeatureList, CurrentEntry, CheckEntry)) {
+ CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a before %a is invalid!\n", CurrentFeature->FeatureName, CheckFeature->FeatureName));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Please check %a relationship!\n", CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
+ ASSERT (FALSE);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (CurrentFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
+ //
+ // Get correct feature entry in feature list.
+ //
+ CheckEntry = FindFeatureInList (FeatureList, CurrentFeature, FALSE);
+ //
+ // ASSERT when current feature's relationship is invalid.
+ //
+ if (CheckEntryBeforeEntry(FeatureList, CurrentEntry, CheckEntry)) {
+ CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a after %a is invalid!\n", CurrentFeature->FeatureName, CheckFeature->FeatureName));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Please check %a relationship!\n", CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
+ ASSERT (FALSE);
+ }
+ }
+ //
+ // Check next feature entry.
+ //
+ CurrentEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ According to CPU feature's dependency, sort all CPU features.
+ Later dependency will override previous dependency if they are conflicted.
+
+ @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
+**/
+VOID
+SortCpuFeatures (
+ IN LIST_ENTRY *FeatureList
+ )
+{
+ LIST_ENTRY *CurrentEntry;
+ CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentFeature;
+ LIST_ENTRY *CheckEntry;
+ LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
+ BOOLEAN Swapped;
+
+ //
+ // Initinate all CPU features' Sorted = FALSE.
+ //
+ CurrentEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
+ while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CurrentEntry)) {
+ CurrentFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CurrentEntry);
+ CurrentFeature->Sorted = FALSE;
+ CurrentEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
+ }
+
+ //
+ // From head to tail, one by one to sort all CPU features.
+ //
+ CurrentEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
+ while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CurrentEntry)) {
+ Swapped = FALSE;
+ CurrentFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CurrentEntry);
+ //
+ // Keep previous feature entry. When current feature entry is swapped,
+ // check current feature entry position again.
+ //
+ TempEntry = CurrentEntry->BackLink;
+ if (!CurrentFeature->Sorted) {
+ if (CurrentFeature->BeforeAll) {
+ RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
+ InsertHeadList (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
+ Swapped = TRUE;
+ }
+
+ if (CurrentFeature->AfterAll) {
+ RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
+ InsertTailList (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
+ Swapped = TRUE;
+ }
+
+ if (CurrentFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
+ //
+ // Get correct feature entry in feature list.
+ //
+ CheckEntry = FindFeatureInList (FeatureList, CurrentFeature, TRUE);
+ //
+ // Swap them if need
+ //
+ if (!CheckEntryBeforeEntry(FeatureList, CurrentEntry, CheckEntry)) {
+ RemoveEntryList (CheckEntry);
+ InsertHeadList (CurrentEntry, CheckEntry);
+ Swapped = TRUE;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (CurrentFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
+ //
+ // Get correct feature entry in feature list.
+ //
+ CheckEntry = FindFeatureInList (FeatureList, CurrentFeature, FALSE);
+ //
+ // Swap them if need.
+ //
+ if (CheckEntryBeforeEntry(FeatureList, CurrentEntry, CheckEntry)) {
+ RemoveEntryList (CheckEntry);
+ InsertTailList (CurrentEntry, CheckEntry);
+ Swapped = TRUE;
+ }
+ }
+ //
+ // This feature has been sorted.
+ //
+ CurrentFeature->Sorted = TRUE;
+ if (Swapped) {
+ //
+ // Check current entry position again.
+ //
+ CurrentEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
+ } else {
+ //
+ // Check next feature entry.
+ //
+ CurrentEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
+ }
+ } else {
+ //
+ // Check next feature entry.
+ //
+ CurrentEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/**
Analysis register CPU features on each processor and save CPU setting in CPU register table.
@param[in] NumberOfCpus Number of processor in system
@@ -466,7 +731,11 @@ AnalysisProcessorFeatures (
//
SetCapabilityPcd (CpuFeaturesData->CapabilityPcd);
SetSettingPcd (CpuFeaturesData->SettingPcd);
-
+ //
+ // Sort and check CPU feature list
+ //
+ SortCpuFeatures(&CpuFeaturesData->FeatureList);
+ CheckCpuFeaturesRelationShip(&CpuFeaturesData->FeatureList);
//
// Dump the last CPU feature list
//
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
index 69b4121..550036b 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ typedef struct {
VOID *ConfigData;
BOOLEAN BeforeAll;
BOOLEAN AfterAll;
+ BOOLEAN Sorted;
} CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY;
typedef struct {
@@ -190,4 +191,10 @@ DumpCpuFeature (
IN CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CpuFeature
);
+BOOLEAN
+IsBitMaskMatchCheck (
+ IN UINT8 *FeatureMask,
+ IN UINT8 *DependentBitMask
+ );
+
#endif
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
index dd6a82b..a2dfcf7 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
@@ -113,131 +113,6 @@ IsBitMaskMatchCheck (
}
/**
- Checks and adjusts CPU features order per dependency relationship.
-
- @param[in] FeatureList Pointer to CPU feature list
-**/
-VOID
-CheckCpuFeaturesDependency (
- IN LIST_ENTRY *FeatureList
- )
-{
- LIST_ENTRY *CurrentEntry;
- CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CpuFeature;
- LIST_ENTRY *CheckEntry;
- CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CheckFeature;
- BOOLEAN Swapped;
- LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
-
- CurrentEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
- while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CurrentEntry)) {
- Swapped = FALSE;
- CpuFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CurrentEntry);
- if (CpuFeature->BeforeAll) {
- //
- // Check all features dispatched before this entry
- //
- CheckEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
- while (CheckEntry != CurrentEntry) {
- CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
- if (!CheckFeature->BeforeAll) {
- //
- // If this feature has no BeforeAll flag and is dispatched before CpuFeature,
- // insert currentEntry before Checked feature
- //
- RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
- InsertTailList (CheckEntry, CurrentEntry);
- Swapped = TRUE;
- break;
- }
- CheckEntry = CheckEntry->ForwardLink;
- }
- if (Swapped) {
- continue;
- }
- }
-
- if (CpuFeature->AfterAll) {
- //
- // Check all features dispatched after this entry
- //
- CheckEntry = GetNextNode (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
- while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CheckEntry)) {
- CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
- if (!CheckFeature->AfterAll) {
- //
- // If this feature has no AfterAll flag and is dispatched after CpuFeature,
- // insert currentEntry after Checked feature
- //
- TempEntry = GetNextNode (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
- RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
- InsertHeadList (CheckEntry, CurrentEntry);
- CurrentEntry = TempEntry;
- Swapped = TRUE;
- break;
- }
- CheckEntry = CheckEntry->ForwardLink;
- }
- if (Swapped) {
- continue;
- }
- }
-
- if (CpuFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
- //
- // Check all features dispatched before this entry
- //
- CheckEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
- while (CheckEntry != CurrentEntry) {
- CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
- if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (CheckFeature->FeatureMask, CpuFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask)) {
- //
- // If there is dependency, swap them
- //
- RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
- InsertTailList (CheckEntry, CurrentEntry);
- Swapped = TRUE;
- break;
- }
- CheckEntry = CheckEntry->ForwardLink;
- }
- if (Swapped) {
- continue;
- }
- }
-
- if (CpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
- //
- // Check all features dispatched after this entry
- //
- CheckEntry = GetNextNode (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
- while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CheckEntry)) {
- CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
- if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (CheckFeature->FeatureMask, CpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask)) {
- //
- // If there is dependency, swap them
- //
- TempEntry = GetNextNode (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
- RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
- InsertHeadList (CheckEntry, CurrentEntry);
- CurrentEntry = TempEntry;
- Swapped = TRUE;
- break;
- }
- CheckEntry = CheckEntry->ForwardLink;
- }
- if (Swapped) {
- continue;
- }
- }
- //
- // No swap happened, check the next feature
- //
- CurrentEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
- }
-}
-
-/**
Worker function to register CPU Feature.
@param[in] CpuFeature Pointer to CPU feature entry
@@ -334,10 +209,7 @@ RegisterCpuFeatureWorker (
FreePool (CpuFeature->FeatureMask);
FreePool (CpuFeature);
}
- //
- // Verify CPU features dependency can change CPU feature order
- //
- CheckCpuFeaturesDependency (&CpuFeaturesData->FeatureList);
+
return RETURN_SUCCESS;
}
--
2.10.2.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
2018-01-31 7:00 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check Song, BinX
@ 2018-01-31 7:41 ` Song, BinX
2018-01-31 9:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Song, BinX @ 2018-01-31 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; +Cc: lersek@redhat.com, Dong, Eric
Hi All,
Attached my test case F.Y.R.
Best Regards,
Bell Song
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Song, BinX
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 3:01 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: lersek@redhat.com; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency
> check
>
> Current CPU feature dependency check will hang on when meet below or
> similar case:
> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> "AESNI",
> AesniGetConfigData,
> AesniSupport,
> AesniInitialize,
> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> CPU_FEATURE_END
> );
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> }
> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> "MWAIT",
> NULL,
> MonitorMwaitSupport,
> MonitorMwaitInitialize,
> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> CPU_FEATURE_END
> );
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> }
>
> Solution is to separate current CPU feature dependency check into
> sort and check two parts.
>
> Sort function:
> According to CPU feature's dependency, sort all CPU features.
> Later dependency will override previous dependency if they are conflicted.
>
> Check function:
> Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid relationship.
>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.song@intel.com>
> ---
> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 271
> ++++++++++++++++++++-
> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h | 7 +
> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 130 +---------
> 3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> index 4d75c07..2fd0d5f 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,271 @@ DumpRegisterTableOnProcessor (
> }
>
> /**
> + From FeatureBitMask, find the right feature entry in CPU feature list.
> +
> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
> + @param[in] CurrentFeature The pointer to current CPU feature.
> + @param[in] BeforeFlag TRUE: BeforeFeatureBitMask; FALSE:
> AfterFeatureBitMask.
> +
> + @return The pointer to right CPU feature entry.
> +**/
> +LIST_ENTRY *
> +FindFeatureInList(
> + IN LIST_ENTRY *CpuFeatureList,
> + IN CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentCpuFeature,
> + IN BOOLEAN BeforeFlag
> + )
> +{
> + LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
> + CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *TempFeature;
> + UINT8 *FeatureBitMask;
> +
> + FeatureBitMask = BeforeFlag ? CurrentCpuFeature-
> >BeforeFeatureBitMask : CurrentCpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask;
> + TempEntry = GetFirstNode (CpuFeatureList);
> + while (!IsNull (CpuFeatureList, TempEntry)) {
> + TempFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (TempEntry);
> + if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (FeatureBitMask, TempFeature->FeatureMask)){
> + return TempEntry;
> + }
> + TempEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
> + }
> +
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a ", CurrentCpuFeature-
> >FeatureName, BeforeFlag ? "before ":"after ", "condition is invalid!\n"));
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Please check %a relationship!\n",
> CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName));
> + ASSERT (FALSE);
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + In CPU feature list, check if one entry is before another entry.
> +
> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
> + @param[in] OneEntry The pointer to current CPU feature entry.
> + @param[in] AnotherEntry The pointer to checked CPU feature entry.
> +
> + @return TRUE One entry is before another entry.
> + @return FALSE One entry is NOT before another entry.
> +**/
> +BOOLEAN
> +CheckEntryBeforeEntry(
> + IN LIST_ENTRY *CpuFeatureList,
> + IN LIST_ENTRY *OneEntry,
> + IN LIST_ENTRY *AnotherEntry
> + )
> +{
> + LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
> +
> + TempEntry = OneEntry;
> + while (!IsNull (CpuFeatureList, TempEntry)) {
> + if (IsNull (AnotherEntry, TempEntry)) {
> + return TRUE;
> + }
> + TempEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
> + }
> + return FALSE;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid one.
> +
> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
> +**/
> +VOID
> +CheckCpuFeaturesRelationShip (
> + IN LIST_ENTRY *FeatureList
> + )
> +{
> + LIST_ENTRY *CurrentEntry;
> + CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentFeature;
> + LIST_ENTRY *CheckEntry;
> + CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CheckFeature;
> +
> + //
> + // From head to tail, one by one to check all CPU features.
> + //
> + CurrentEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
> + while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CurrentEntry)) {
> + CurrentFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CurrentEntry);
> + ASSERT (CurrentFeature->Sorted);
> + if (CurrentFeature->BeforeAll) {
> + CheckEntry = CurrentEntry->BackLink;
> + while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CheckEntry)) {
> + CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
> + //
> + // Check all features before this entry,
> + // ASSERT when feature has no BeforeAll flag.
> + //
> + if (!CheckFeature->BeforeAll){
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a before all is invalid!\n",
> CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Please check %a relationship!\n",
> CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
> + ASSERT (FALSE);
> + }
> + CheckEntry = CheckEntry->BackLink;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (CurrentFeature->AfterAll) {
> + CheckEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
> + while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CheckEntry)) {
> + CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
> + //
> + // Check all features after this entry,
> + // ASSERT when feature has no AfterAll flag.
> + //
> + if(!CheckFeature->AfterAll){
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a after all is invalid!\n",
> CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Please check %a relationship!\n",
> CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
> + ASSERT (FALSE);
> + }
> + CheckEntry = CheckEntry->ForwardLink;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (CurrentFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
> + //
> + // Get correct feature entry in feature list.
> + //
> + CheckEntry = FindFeatureInList (FeatureList, CurrentFeature, TRUE);
> + //
> + // ASSERT when current feature's relationship is invalid.
> + //
> + if (!CheckEntryBeforeEntry(FeatureList, CurrentEntry, CheckEntry)) {
> + CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a before %a is invalid!\n",
> CurrentFeature->FeatureName, CheckFeature->FeatureName));
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Please check %a relationship!\n",
> CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
> + ASSERT (FALSE);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (CurrentFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
> + //
> + // Get correct feature entry in feature list.
> + //
> + CheckEntry = FindFeatureInList (FeatureList, CurrentFeature, FALSE);
> + //
> + // ASSERT when current feature's relationship is invalid.
> + //
> + if (CheckEntryBeforeEntry(FeatureList, CurrentEntry, CheckEntry)) {
> + CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a after %a is invalid!\n",
> CurrentFeature->FeatureName, CheckFeature->FeatureName));
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Please check %a relationship!\n",
> CurrentFeature->FeatureName));
> + ASSERT (FALSE);
> + }
> + }
> + //
> + // Check next feature entry.
> + //
> + CurrentEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + According to CPU feature's dependency, sort all CPU features.
> + Later dependency will override previous dependency if they are conflicted.
> +
> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
> +**/
> +VOID
> +SortCpuFeatures (
> + IN LIST_ENTRY *FeatureList
> + )
> +{
> + LIST_ENTRY *CurrentEntry;
> + CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentFeature;
> + LIST_ENTRY *CheckEntry;
> + LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
> + BOOLEAN Swapped;
> +
> + //
> + // Initinate all CPU features' Sorted = FALSE.
> + //
> + CurrentEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
> + while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CurrentEntry)) {
> + CurrentFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CurrentEntry);
> + CurrentFeature->Sorted = FALSE;
> + CurrentEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
> + }
> +
> + //
> + // From head to tail, one by one to sort all CPU features.
> + //
> + CurrentEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
> + while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CurrentEntry)) {
> + Swapped = FALSE;
> + CurrentFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CurrentEntry);
> + //
> + // Keep previous feature entry. When current feature entry is swapped,
> + // check current feature entry position again.
> + //
> + TempEntry = CurrentEntry->BackLink;
> + if (!CurrentFeature->Sorted) {
> + if (CurrentFeature->BeforeAll) {
> + RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
> + InsertHeadList (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
> + Swapped = TRUE;
> + }
> +
> + if (CurrentFeature->AfterAll) {
> + RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
> + InsertTailList (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
> + Swapped = TRUE;
> + }
> +
> + if (CurrentFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
> + //
> + // Get correct feature entry in feature list.
> + //
> + CheckEntry = FindFeatureInList (FeatureList, CurrentFeature, TRUE);
> + //
> + // Swap them if need
> + //
> + if (!CheckEntryBeforeEntry(FeatureList, CurrentEntry, CheckEntry)) {
> + RemoveEntryList (CheckEntry);
> + InsertHeadList (CurrentEntry, CheckEntry);
> + Swapped = TRUE;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (CurrentFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
> + //
> + // Get correct feature entry in feature list.
> + //
> + CheckEntry = FindFeatureInList (FeatureList, CurrentFeature, FALSE);
> + //
> + // Swap them if need.
> + //
> + if (CheckEntryBeforeEntry(FeatureList, CurrentEntry, CheckEntry)) {
> + RemoveEntryList (CheckEntry);
> + InsertTailList (CurrentEntry, CheckEntry);
> + Swapped = TRUE;
> + }
> + }
> + //
> + // This feature has been sorted.
> + //
> + CurrentFeature->Sorted = TRUE;
> + if (Swapped) {
> + //
> + // Check current entry position again.
> + //
> + CurrentEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
> + } else {
> + //
> + // Check next feature entry.
> + //
> + CurrentEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
> + }
> + } else {
> + //
> + // Check next feature entry.
> + //
> + CurrentEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> Analysis register CPU features on each processor and save CPU setting in
> CPU register table.
>
> @param[in] NumberOfCpus Number of processor in system
> @@ -466,7 +731,11 @@ AnalysisProcessorFeatures (
> //
> SetCapabilityPcd (CpuFeaturesData->CapabilityPcd);
> SetSettingPcd (CpuFeaturesData->SettingPcd);
> -
> + //
> + // Sort and check CPU feature list
> + //
> + SortCpuFeatures(&CpuFeaturesData->FeatureList);
> + CheckCpuFeaturesRelationShip(&CpuFeaturesData->FeatureList);
> //
> // Dump the last CPU feature list
> //
> diff --git
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
> index 69b4121..550036b 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ typedef struct {
> VOID *ConfigData;
> BOOLEAN BeforeAll;
> BOOLEAN AfterAll;
> + BOOLEAN Sorted;
> } CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY;
>
> typedef struct {
> @@ -190,4 +191,10 @@ DumpCpuFeature (
> IN CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CpuFeature
> );
>
> +BOOLEAN
> +IsBitMaskMatchCheck (
> + IN UINT8 *FeatureMask,
> + IN UINT8 *DependentBitMask
> + );
> +
> #endif
> diff --git
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> index dd6a82b..a2dfcf7 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> @@ -113,131 +113,6 @@ IsBitMaskMatchCheck (
> }
>
> /**
> - Checks and adjusts CPU features order per dependency relationship.
> -
> - @param[in] FeatureList Pointer to CPU feature list
> -**/
> -VOID
> -CheckCpuFeaturesDependency (
> - IN LIST_ENTRY *FeatureList
> - )
> -{
> - LIST_ENTRY *CurrentEntry;
> - CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CpuFeature;
> - LIST_ENTRY *CheckEntry;
> - CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CheckFeature;
> - BOOLEAN Swapped;
> - LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
> -
> - CurrentEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
> - while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CurrentEntry)) {
> - Swapped = FALSE;
> - CpuFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CurrentEntry);
> - if (CpuFeature->BeforeAll) {
> - //
> - // Check all features dispatched before this entry
> - //
> - CheckEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
> - while (CheckEntry != CurrentEntry) {
> - CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
> - if (!CheckFeature->BeforeAll) {
> - //
> - // If this feature has no BeforeAll flag and is dispatched before
> CpuFeature,
> - // insert currentEntry before Checked feature
> - //
> - RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
> - InsertTailList (CheckEntry, CurrentEntry);
> - Swapped = TRUE;
> - break;
> - }
> - CheckEntry = CheckEntry->ForwardLink;
> - }
> - if (Swapped) {
> - continue;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (CpuFeature->AfterAll) {
> - //
> - // Check all features dispatched after this entry
> - //
> - CheckEntry = GetNextNode (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
> - while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CheckEntry)) {
> - CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
> - if (!CheckFeature->AfterAll) {
> - //
> - // If this feature has no AfterAll flag and is dispatched after CpuFeature,
> - // insert currentEntry after Checked feature
> - //
> - TempEntry = GetNextNode (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
> - RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
> - InsertHeadList (CheckEntry, CurrentEntry);
> - CurrentEntry = TempEntry;
> - Swapped = TRUE;
> - break;
> - }
> - CheckEntry = CheckEntry->ForwardLink;
> - }
> - if (Swapped) {
> - continue;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (CpuFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
> - //
> - // Check all features dispatched before this entry
> - //
> - CheckEntry = GetFirstNode (FeatureList);
> - while (CheckEntry != CurrentEntry) {
> - CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
> - if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (CheckFeature->FeatureMask, CpuFeature-
> >BeforeFeatureBitMask)) {
> - //
> - // If there is dependency, swap them
> - //
> - RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
> - InsertTailList (CheckEntry, CurrentEntry);
> - Swapped = TRUE;
> - break;
> - }
> - CheckEntry = CheckEntry->ForwardLink;
> - }
> - if (Swapped) {
> - continue;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (CpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask != NULL) {
> - //
> - // Check all features dispatched after this entry
> - //
> - CheckEntry = GetNextNode (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
> - while (!IsNull (FeatureList, CheckEntry)) {
> - CheckFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (CheckEntry);
> - if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (CheckFeature->FeatureMask, CpuFeature-
> >AfterFeatureBitMask)) {
> - //
> - // If there is dependency, swap them
> - //
> - TempEntry = GetNextNode (FeatureList, CurrentEntry);
> - RemoveEntryList (CurrentEntry);
> - InsertHeadList (CheckEntry, CurrentEntry);
> - CurrentEntry = TempEntry;
> - Swapped = TRUE;
> - break;
> - }
> - CheckEntry = CheckEntry->ForwardLink;
> - }
> - if (Swapped) {
> - continue;
> - }
> - }
> - //
> - // No swap happened, check the next feature
> - //
> - CurrentEntry = CurrentEntry->ForwardLink;
> - }
> -}
> -
> -/**
> Worker function to register CPU Feature.
>
> @param[in] CpuFeature Pointer to CPU feature entry
> @@ -334,10 +209,7 @@ RegisterCpuFeatureWorker (
> FreePool (CpuFeature->FeatureMask);
> FreePool (CpuFeature);
> }
> - //
> - // Verify CPU features dependency can change CPU feature order
> - //
> - CheckCpuFeaturesDependency (&CpuFeaturesData->FeatureList);
> +
> return RETURN_SUCCESS;
> }
>
> --
> 2.10.2.windows.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
2018-01-31 7:00 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check Song, BinX
2018-01-31 7:41 ` Song, BinX
@ 2018-01-31 9:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-01 2:09 ` Song, BinX
2018-02-01 5:10 ` Ni, Ruiyu
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo Ersek @ 2018-01-31 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Song, BinX, edk2-devel@lists.01.org; +Cc: Dong, Eric
On 01/31/18 08:00, Song, BinX wrote:
> Current CPU feature dependency check will hang on when meet below or
> similar case:
> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> "AESNI",
> AesniGetConfigData,
> AesniSupport,
> AesniInitialize,
> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> CPU_FEATURE_END
> );
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> }
> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> "MWAIT",
> NULL,
> MonitorMwaitSupport,
> MonitorMwaitInitialize,
> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> CPU_FEATURE_END
> );
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> }
>
> Solution is to separate current CPU feature dependency check into
> sort and check two parts.
>
> Sort function:
> According to CPU feature's dependency, sort all CPU features.
> Later dependency will override previous dependency if they are conflicted.
>
> Check function:
> Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid relationship.
>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.song@intel.com>
> ---
> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 271 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h | 7 +
> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 130 +---------
> 3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> index 4d75c07..2fd0d5f 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,271 @@ DumpRegisterTableOnProcessor (
> }
>
> /**
> + From FeatureBitMask, find the right feature entry in CPU feature list.
> +
> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
> + @param[in] CurrentFeature The pointer to current CPU feature.
> + @param[in] BeforeFlag TRUE: BeforeFeatureBitMask; FALSE: AfterFeatureBitMask.
> +
> + @return The pointer to right CPU feature entry.
> +**/
> +LIST_ENTRY *
> +FindFeatureInList(
> + IN LIST_ENTRY *CpuFeatureList,
> + IN CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentCpuFeature,
> + IN BOOLEAN BeforeFlag
> + )
> +{
> + LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
> + CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *TempFeature;
> + UINT8 *FeatureBitMask;
> +
> + FeatureBitMask = BeforeFlag ? CurrentCpuFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask : CurrentCpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask;
> + TempEntry = GetFirstNode (CpuFeatureList);
> + while (!IsNull (CpuFeatureList, TempEntry)) {
> + TempFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (TempEntry);
> + if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (FeatureBitMask, TempFeature->FeatureMask)){
> + return TempEntry;
> + }
> + TempEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
> + }
> +
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a ", CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName, BeforeFlag ? "before ":"after ", "condition is invalid!\n"));
Hi, I skimmed this patch quickly -- I can tell that I can't really tell
what's going on. I don't know how the feature dependencies are defined
in the first place, and what the bug is.
However, I do see that the above DEBUG macro invocation is incorrect.
The format string has one (1) %a conversion specification, but we pass
three (3) arguments.
I think the last argument ("condition is invalid!\n") should actually be
part of the format string. And then, the "before"/"after" string has to
be printed somehow as well.
Another superficial observation below:
> +/**
> + Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid one.
> +
> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
> +**/
> +VOID
> +CheckCpuFeaturesRelationShip (
I don't think we should capitalize "Ship" in this identifier.
Third comment: there are several ways to define "sorting", so I'm not
sure my question applies, but: can we replace the manual sorting with
SortLib?
Thanks
Laszlo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
2018-01-31 9:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
@ 2018-02-01 2:09 ` Song, BinX
2018-02-01 13:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-01 5:10 ` Ni, Ruiyu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Song, BinX @ 2018-02-01 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laszlo Ersek, edk2-devel@lists.01.org; +Cc: Dong, Eric
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks for your comments.
Explain the issue first:
In CpuCommonFeaturesLib.inf -> CpuCommonFeaturesLib.c -> CpuCommonFeaturesLibConstructor() function,
it invokes RegisterCpuFeature() to register CPU feature. Some original source codes is here.
if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
"AESNI",
AesniGetConfigData,
AesniSupport,
AesniInitialize,
CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
CPU_FEATURE_END
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
}
if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
"MWAIT",
NULL,
MonitorMwaitSupport,
MonitorMwaitInitialize,
CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
CPU_FEATURE_END
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
}
Then I update them to below.
if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
"AESNI",
AesniGetConfigData,
AesniSupport,
AesniInitialize,
CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
CPU_FEATURE_END
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
}
if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
"MWAIT",
NULL,
MonitorMwaitSupport,
MonitorMwaitInitialize,
CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
CPU_FEATURE_END
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
}
Original function CheckCpuFeaturesDependency() will enter a dead loop and prompt nothing when checking and sorting them.
I think a better way is to detect this conflicted logic and give some hints to user, then assert(false).
For your three comments.
1. How about change to this?
if (BeforeFlag) {
DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a before condition is invalid!", CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName));
} else {
DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a after condition is invalid!", CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName));
}
2. Will update it in V2 patch.
3. How about add a prefix before the name? RegisterCpuFeaturesLibSortCpuFeatures() will be unique.
Best Regards,
Bell Song
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 5:44 PM
> To: Song, BinX <binx.song@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
>
> On 01/31/18 08:00, Song, BinX wrote:
> > Current CPU feature dependency check will hang on when meet below or
> > similar case:
> > if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
> > Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> > "AESNI",
> > AesniGetConfigData,
> > AesniSupport,
> > AesniInitialize,
> > CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
> > CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> > CPU_FEATURE_END
> > );
> > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> > }
> > if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
> > Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> > "MWAIT",
> > NULL,
> > MonitorMwaitSupport,
> > MonitorMwaitInitialize,
> > CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
> > CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> > CPU_FEATURE_END
> > );
> > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> > }
> >
> > Solution is to separate current CPU feature dependency check into
> > sort and check two parts.
> >
> > Sort function:
> > According to CPU feature's dependency, sort all CPU features.
> > Later dependency will override previous dependency if they are conflicted.
> >
> > Check function:
> > Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid relationship.
> >
> > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.song@intel.com>
> > ---
> > .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 271
> ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h | 7 +
> > .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 130 +---------
> > 3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> > index 4d75c07..2fd0d5f 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> > @@ -423,6 +423,271 @@ DumpRegisterTableOnProcessor (
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > + From FeatureBitMask, find the right feature entry in CPU feature list.
> > +
> > + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
> > + @param[in] CurrentFeature The pointer to current CPU feature.
> > + @param[in] BeforeFlag TRUE: BeforeFeatureBitMask; FALSE:
> AfterFeatureBitMask.
> > +
> > + @return The pointer to right CPU feature entry.
> > +**/
> > +LIST_ENTRY *
> > +FindFeatureInList(
> > + IN LIST_ENTRY *CpuFeatureList,
> > + IN CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentCpuFeature,
> > + IN BOOLEAN BeforeFlag
> > + )
> > +{
> > + LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
> > + CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *TempFeature;
> > + UINT8 *FeatureBitMask;
> > +
> > + FeatureBitMask = BeforeFlag ? CurrentCpuFeature-
> >BeforeFeatureBitMask : CurrentCpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask;
> > + TempEntry = GetFirstNode (CpuFeatureList);
> > + while (!IsNull (CpuFeatureList, TempEntry)) {
> > + TempFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (TempEntry);
> > + if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (FeatureBitMask, TempFeature-
> >FeatureMask)){
> > + return TempEntry;
> > + }
> > + TempEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
> > + }
> > +
> > + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a ", CurrentCpuFeature-
> >FeatureName, BeforeFlag ? "before ":"after ", "condition is invalid!\n"));
>
> Hi, I skimmed this patch quickly -- I can tell that I can't really tell
> what's going on. I don't know how the feature dependencies are defined
> in the first place, and what the bug is.
>
> However, I do see that the above DEBUG macro invocation is incorrect.
> The format string has one (1) %a conversion specification, but we pass
> three (3) arguments.
>
> I think the last argument ("condition is invalid!\n") should actually be
> part of the format string. And then, the "before"/"after" string has to
> be printed somehow as well.
>
> Another superficial observation below:
>
> > +/**
> > + Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid one.
> > +
> > + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
> > +**/
> > +VOID
> > +CheckCpuFeaturesRelationShip (
>
> I don't think we should capitalize "Ship" in this identifier.
>
> Third comment: there are several ways to define "sorting", so I'm not
> sure my question applies, but: can we replace the manual sorting with
> SortLib?
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
2018-02-01 2:09 ` Song, BinX
@ 2018-02-01 13:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-02 1:34 ` Song, BinX
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo Ersek @ 2018-02-01 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Song, BinX, edk2-devel@lists.01.org; +Cc: Dong, Eric
On 02/01/18 03:09, Song, BinX wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
> Explain the issue first:
> In CpuCommonFeaturesLib.inf -> CpuCommonFeaturesLib.c -> CpuCommonFeaturesLibConstructor() function,
> it invokes RegisterCpuFeature() to register CPU feature. Some original source codes is here.
> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> "AESNI",
> AesniGetConfigData,
> AesniSupport,
> AesniInitialize,
> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
> CPU_FEATURE_END
> );
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> }
> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> "MWAIT",
> NULL,
> MonitorMwaitSupport,
> MonitorMwaitInitialize,
> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
> CPU_FEATURE_END
> );
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> }
>
> Then I update them to below.
> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> "AESNI",
> AesniGetConfigData,
> AesniSupport,
> AesniInitialize,
> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> CPU_FEATURE_END
> );
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> }
> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> "MWAIT",
> NULL,
> MonitorMwaitSupport,
> MonitorMwaitInitialize,
> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> CPU_FEATURE_END
> );
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> }
> Original function CheckCpuFeaturesDependency() will enter a dead loop and prompt nothing when checking and sorting them.
Ah, I see, so the RegisterCpuFeature() call can add before/after hints
to the features. And circular dependencies cause an infinite loop currently.
> I think a better way is to detect this conflicted logic and give some hints to user, then assert(false).
>
> For your three comments.
> 1. How about change to this?
> if (BeforeFlag) {
> DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a before condition is invalid!", CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName));
> } else {
> DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a after condition is invalid!", CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName));
> }
It's OK to do this as well:
DEBUG ((
DEBUG_ERROR,
"Error: Feature %a %a condition is invalid!\n",
CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName,
BeforeFlag ? "before" : "after"
));
> 2. Will update it in V2 patch.
> 3. How about add a prefix before the name? RegisterCpuFeaturesLibSortCpuFeatures() will be unique.
Sure.
Thanks!
Laszlo
>
> Best Regards,
> Bell Song
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 5:44 PM
>> To: Song, BinX <binx.song@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
>>
>> On 01/31/18 08:00, Song, BinX wrote:
>>> Current CPU feature dependency check will hang on when meet below or
>>> similar case:
>>> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
>>> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
>>> "AESNI",
>>> AesniGetConfigData,
>>> AesniSupport,
>>> AesniInitialize,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_END
>>> );
>>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>> }
>>> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
>>> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
>>> "MWAIT",
>>> NULL,
>>> MonitorMwaitSupport,
>>> MonitorMwaitInitialize,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_END
>>> );
>>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>> }
>>>
>>> Solution is to separate current CPU feature dependency check into
>>> sort and check two parts.
>>>
>>> Sort function:
>>> According to CPU feature's dependency, sort all CPU features.
>>> Later dependency will override previous dependency if they are conflicted.
>>>
>>> Check function:
>>> Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid relationship.
>>>
>>> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>>> Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.song@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 271
>> ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h | 7 +
>>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 130 +---------
>>> 3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git
>> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>>> index 4d75c07..2fd0d5f 100644
>>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>>> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>>> @@ -423,6 +423,271 @@ DumpRegisterTableOnProcessor (
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> + From FeatureBitMask, find the right feature entry in CPU feature list.
>>> +
>>> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
>>> + @param[in] CurrentFeature The pointer to current CPU feature.
>>> + @param[in] BeforeFlag TRUE: BeforeFeatureBitMask; FALSE:
>> AfterFeatureBitMask.
>>> +
>>> + @return The pointer to right CPU feature entry.
>>> +**/
>>> +LIST_ENTRY *
>>> +FindFeatureInList(
>>> + IN LIST_ENTRY *CpuFeatureList,
>>> + IN CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentCpuFeature,
>>> + IN BOOLEAN BeforeFlag
>>> + )
>>> +{
>>> + LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
>>> + CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *TempFeature;
>>> + UINT8 *FeatureBitMask;
>>> +
>>> + FeatureBitMask = BeforeFlag ? CurrentCpuFeature-
>>> BeforeFeatureBitMask : CurrentCpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask;
>>> + TempEntry = GetFirstNode (CpuFeatureList);
>>> + while (!IsNull (CpuFeatureList, TempEntry)) {
>>> + TempFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (TempEntry);
>>> + if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (FeatureBitMask, TempFeature-
>>> FeatureMask)){
>>> + return TempEntry;
>>> + }
>>> + TempEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a ", CurrentCpuFeature-
>>> FeatureName, BeforeFlag ? "before ":"after ", "condition is invalid!\n"));
>>
>> Hi, I skimmed this patch quickly -- I can tell that I can't really tell
>> what's going on. I don't know how the feature dependencies are defined
>> in the first place, and what the bug is.
>>
>> However, I do see that the above DEBUG macro invocation is incorrect.
>> The format string has one (1) %a conversion specification, but we pass
>> three (3) arguments.
>>
>> I think the last argument ("condition is invalid!\n") should actually be
>> part of the format string. And then, the "before"/"after" string has to
>> be printed somehow as well.
>>
>> Another superficial observation below:
>>
>>> +/**
>>> + Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid one.
>>> +
>>> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
>>> +**/
>>> +VOID
>>> +CheckCpuFeaturesRelationShip (
>>
>> I don't think we should capitalize "Ship" in this identifier.
>>
>> Third comment: there are several ways to define "sorting", so I'm not
>> sure my question applies, but: can we replace the manual sorting with
>> SortLib?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Laszlo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
2018-02-01 13:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
@ 2018-02-02 1:34 ` Song, BinX
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Song, BinX @ 2018-02-02 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laszlo Ersek, edk2-devel@lists.01.org; +Cc: Dong, Eric, Ni, Ruiyu
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks for your reply, I have also discussed this patch with Eric and Ray, all comments will be in the V2 patch.
Best Regards,
Bell Song
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 9:16 PM
> To: Song, BinX <binx.song@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
>
> On 02/01/18 03:09, Song, BinX wrote:
> > Hi Laszlo,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments.
> > Explain the issue first:
> > In CpuCommonFeaturesLib.inf -> CpuCommonFeaturesLib.c ->
> CpuCommonFeaturesLibConstructor() function,
> > it invokes RegisterCpuFeature() to register CPU feature. Some original
> source codes is here.
> > if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
> > Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> > "AESNI",
> > AesniGetConfigData,
> > AesniSupport,
> > AesniInitialize,
> > CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
> > CPU_FEATURE_END
> > );
> > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> > }
> > if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
> > Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> > "MWAIT",
> > NULL,
> > MonitorMwaitSupport,
> > MonitorMwaitInitialize,
> > CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
> > CPU_FEATURE_END
> > );
> > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> > }
> >
> > Then I update them to below.
> > if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
> > Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> > "AESNI",
> > AesniGetConfigData,
> > AesniSupport,
> > AesniInitialize,
> > CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
> > CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> > CPU_FEATURE_END
> > );
> > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> > }
> > if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
> > Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> > "MWAIT",
> > NULL,
> > MonitorMwaitSupport,
> > MonitorMwaitInitialize,
> > CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
> > CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> > CPU_FEATURE_END
> > );
> > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> > }
> > Original function CheckCpuFeaturesDependency() will enter a dead loop
> and prompt nothing when checking and sorting them.
>
> Ah, I see, so the RegisterCpuFeature() call can add before/after hints
> to the features. And circular dependencies cause an infinite loop currently.
>
> > I think a better way is to detect this conflicted logic and give some hints to
> user, then assert(false).
> >
> > For your three comments.
> > 1. How about change to this?
> > if (BeforeFlag) {
> > DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a before condition is invalid!",
> CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName));
> > } else {
> > DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a after condition is invalid!",
> CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName));
> > }
>
> It's OK to do this as well:
>
> DEBUG ((
> DEBUG_ERROR,
> "Error: Feature %a %a condition is invalid!\n",
> CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName,
> BeforeFlag ? "before" : "after"
> ));
>
> > 2. Will update it in V2 patch.
> > 3. How about add a prefix before the name?
> RegisterCpuFeaturesLibSortCpuFeatures() will be unique.
>
> Sure.
>
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
>
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Bell Song
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 5:44 PM
> >> To: Song, BinX <binx.song@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> >> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency
> check
> >>
> >> On 01/31/18 08:00, Song, BinX wrote:
> >>> Current CPU feature dependency check will hang on when meet below
> or
> >>> similar case:
> >>> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
> >>> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> >>> "AESNI",
> >>> AesniGetConfigData,
> >>> AesniSupport,
> >>> AesniInitialize,
> >>> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
> >>> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> >>> CPU_FEATURE_END
> >>> );
> >>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> >>> }
> >>> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
> >>> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
> >>> "MWAIT",
> >>> NULL,
> >>> MonitorMwaitSupport,
> >>> MonitorMwaitInitialize,
> >>> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
> >>> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
> >>> CPU_FEATURE_END
> >>> );
> >>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> Solution is to separate current CPU feature dependency check into
> >>> sort and check two parts.
> >>>
> >>> Sort function:
> >>> According to CPU feature's dependency, sort all CPU features.
> >>> Later dependency will override previous dependency if they are
> conflicted.
> >>>
> >>> Check function:
> >>> Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid relationship.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> >>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> >>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> >>> Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.song@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 271
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h | 7 +
> >>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 130 +---------
> >>> 3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git
> >> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> >> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> >>> index 4d75c07..2fd0d5f 100644
> >>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> >>> +++
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> >>> @@ -423,6 +423,271 @@ DumpRegisterTableOnProcessor (
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >>> + From FeatureBitMask, find the right feature entry in CPU feature list.
> >>> +
> >>> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
> >>> + @param[in] CurrentFeature The pointer to current CPU feature.
> >>> + @param[in] BeforeFlag TRUE: BeforeFeatureBitMask; FALSE:
> >> AfterFeatureBitMask.
> >>> +
> >>> + @return The pointer to right CPU feature entry.
> >>> +**/
> >>> +LIST_ENTRY *
> >>> +FindFeatureInList(
> >>> + IN LIST_ENTRY *CpuFeatureList,
> >>> + IN CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentCpuFeature,
> >>> + IN BOOLEAN BeforeFlag
> >>> + )
> >>> +{
> >>> + LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
> >>> + CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *TempFeature;
> >>> + UINT8 *FeatureBitMask;
> >>> +
> >>> + FeatureBitMask = BeforeFlag ? CurrentCpuFeature-
> >>> BeforeFeatureBitMask : CurrentCpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask;
> >>> + TempEntry = GetFirstNode (CpuFeatureList);
> >>> + while (!IsNull (CpuFeatureList, TempEntry)) {
> >>> + TempFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (TempEntry);
> >>> + if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (FeatureBitMask, TempFeature-
> >>> FeatureMask)){
> >>> + return TempEntry;
> >>> + }
> >>> + TempEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a ", CurrentCpuFeature-
> >>> FeatureName, BeforeFlag ? "before ":"after ", "condition is invalid!\n"));
> >>
> >> Hi, I skimmed this patch quickly -- I can tell that I can't really tell
> >> what's going on. I don't know how the feature dependencies are defined
> >> in the first place, and what the bug is.
> >>
> >> However, I do see that the above DEBUG macro invocation is incorrect.
> >> The format string has one (1) %a conversion specification, but we pass
> >> three (3) arguments.
> >>
> >> I think the last argument ("condition is invalid!\n") should actually be
> >> part of the format string. And then, the "before"/"after" string has to
> >> be printed somehow as well.
> >>
> >> Another superficial observation below:
> >>
> >>> +/**
> >>> + Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid one.
> >>> +
> >>> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
> >>> +**/
> >>> +VOID
> >>> +CheckCpuFeaturesRelationShip (
> >>
> >> I don't think we should capitalize "Ship" in this identifier.
> >>
> >> Third comment: there are several ways to define "sorting", so I'm not
> >> sure my question applies, but: can we replace the manual sorting with
> >> SortLib?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Laszlo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
2018-01-31 9:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-01 2:09 ` Song, BinX
@ 2018-02-01 5:10 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-02-01 13:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ni, Ruiyu @ 2018-02-01 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laszlo Ersek, Song, BinX, edk2-devel@lists.01.org; +Cc: Dong, Eric
On 1/31/2018 5:44 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/31/18 08:00, Song, BinX wrote:
>> Current CPU feature dependency check will hang on when meet below or
>> similar case:
>> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
>> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
>> "AESNI",
>> AesniGetConfigData,
>> AesniSupport,
>> AesniInitialize,
>> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
>> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
>> CPU_FEATURE_END
>> );
>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>> }
>> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
>> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
>> "MWAIT",
>> NULL,
>> MonitorMwaitSupport,
>> MonitorMwaitInitialize,
>> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
>> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
>> CPU_FEATURE_END
>> );
>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>> }
>>
>> Solution is to separate current CPU feature dependency check into
>> sort and check two parts.
>>
>> Sort function:
>> According to CPU feature's dependency, sort all CPU features.
>> Later dependency will override previous dependency if they are conflicted.
>>
>> Check function:
>> Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid relationship.
>>
>> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>> Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.song@intel.com>
>> ---
>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 271 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h | 7 +
>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 130 +---------
>> 3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>> index 4d75c07..2fd0d5f 100644
>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>> @@ -423,6 +423,271 @@ DumpRegisterTableOnProcessor (
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> + From FeatureBitMask, find the right feature entry in CPU feature list.
>> +
>> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
>> + @param[in] CurrentFeature The pointer to current CPU feature.
>> + @param[in] BeforeFlag TRUE: BeforeFeatureBitMask; FALSE: AfterFeatureBitMask.
>> +
>> + @return The pointer to right CPU feature entry.
>> +**/
>> +LIST_ENTRY *
>> +FindFeatureInList(
>> + IN LIST_ENTRY *CpuFeatureList,
>> + IN CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentCpuFeature,
>> + IN BOOLEAN BeforeFlag
>> + )
>> +{
>> + LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
>> + CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *TempFeature;
>> + UINT8 *FeatureBitMask;
>> +
>> + FeatureBitMask = BeforeFlag ? CurrentCpuFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask : CurrentCpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask;
>> + TempEntry = GetFirstNode (CpuFeatureList);
>> + while (!IsNull (CpuFeatureList, TempEntry)) {
>> + TempFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (TempEntry);
>> + if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (FeatureBitMask, TempFeature->FeatureMask)){
>> + return TempEntry;
>> + }
>> + TempEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
>> + }
>> +
>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a ", CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName, BeforeFlag ? "before ":"after ", "condition is invalid!\n"));
>
> Hi, I skimmed this patch quickly -- I can tell that I can't really tell
> what's going on. I don't know how the feature dependencies are defined
> in the first place, and what the bug is.
>
> However, I do see that the above DEBUG macro invocation is incorrect.
> The format string has one (1) %a conversion specification, but we pass
> three (3) arguments.
>
> I think the last argument ("condition is invalid!\n") should actually be
> part of the format string. And then, the "before"/"after" string has to
> be printed somehow as well.
>
> Another superficial observation below:
>
>> +/**
>> + Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid one.
>> +
>> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
>> +**/
>> +VOID
>> +CheckCpuFeaturesRelationShip (
>
> I don't think we should capitalize "Ship" in this identifier.
>
> Third comment: there are several ways to define "sorting", so I'm not
> sure my question applies, but: can we replace the manual sorting with
> SortLib?
Laszlo,
I haven't checked the patch in details.
But regarding to the SortLib suggestion, the feature entry is chained in
linked list, while SortLib can only perform sorting in array.
Bin,
Can we have a simpler fix to this issue?
If my understanding is correct, the patch tries to fix the infinite loop
in code.
If that's true, can we just firstly calculate how many loops are
expected before looping, then exit when the maximum loop is met?
Upon that, when the sort hasn't been finished, a wrong dependency
exists.
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
--
Thanks,
Ray
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check
2018-02-01 5:10 ` Ni, Ruiyu
@ 2018-02-01 13:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo Ersek @ 2018-02-01 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ni, Ruiyu, Song, BinX, edk2-devel@lists.01.org; +Cc: Dong, Eric
On 02/01/18 06:10, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> On 1/31/2018 5:44 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 01/31/18 08:00, Song, BinX wrote:
>>> Current CPU feature dependency check will hang on when meet below or
>>> similar case:
>>> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_AESNI)) {
>>> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
>>> "AESNI",
>>> AesniGetConfigData,
>>> AesniSupport,
>>> AesniInitialize,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_END
>>> );
>>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>> }
>>> if (IsCpuFeatureSupported (CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
>>> Status = RegisterCpuFeature (
>>> "MWAIT",
>>> NULL,
>>> MonitorMwaitSupport,
>>> MonitorMwaitInitialize,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_MWAIT,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_AESNI | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE,
>>> CPU_FEATURE_END
>>> );
>>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>> }
>>>
>>> Solution is to separate current CPU feature dependency check into
>>> sort and check two parts.
>>>
>>> Sort function:
>>> According to CPU feature's dependency, sort all CPU features.
>>> Later dependency will override previous dependency if they are
>>> conflicted.
>>>
>>> Check function:
>>> Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid relationship.
>>>
>>> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>>> Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.song@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 271
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeatures.h | 7 +
>>> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 130 +---------
>>> 3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>>> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>>> index 4d75c07..2fd0d5f 100644
>>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>>> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
>>> @@ -423,6 +423,271 @@ DumpRegisterTableOnProcessor (
>>> }
>>> /**
>>> + From FeatureBitMask, find the right feature entry in CPU feature
>>> list.
>>> +
>>> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
>>> + @param[in] CurrentFeature The pointer to current CPU feature.
>>> + @param[in] BeforeFlag TRUE: BeforeFeatureBitMask; FALSE:
>>> AfterFeatureBitMask.
>>> +
>>> + @return The pointer to right CPU feature entry.
>>> +**/
>>> +LIST_ENTRY *
>>> +FindFeatureInList(
>>> + IN LIST_ENTRY *CpuFeatureList,
>>> + IN CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *CurrentCpuFeature,
>>> + IN BOOLEAN BeforeFlag
>>> + )
>>> +{
>>> + LIST_ENTRY *TempEntry;
>>> + CPU_FEATURES_ENTRY *TempFeature;
>>> + UINT8 *FeatureBitMask;
>>> +
>>> + FeatureBitMask = BeforeFlag ?
>>> CurrentCpuFeature->BeforeFeatureBitMask :
>>> CurrentCpuFeature->AfterFeatureBitMask;
>>> + TempEntry = GetFirstNode (CpuFeatureList);
>>> + while (!IsNull (CpuFeatureList, TempEntry)) {
>>> + TempFeature = CPU_FEATURE_ENTRY_FROM_LINK (TempEntry);
>>> + if (IsBitMaskMatchCheck (FeatureBitMask,
>>> TempFeature->FeatureMask)){
>>> + return TempEntry;
>>> + }
>>> + TempEntry = TempEntry->ForwardLink;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Error: Feature %a ",
>>> CurrentCpuFeature->FeatureName, BeforeFlag ? "before ":"after ",
>>> "condition is invalid!\n"));
>>
>> Hi, I skimmed this patch quickly -- I can tell that I can't really tell
>> what's going on. I don't know how the feature dependencies are defined
>> in the first place, and what the bug is.
>>
>> However, I do see that the above DEBUG macro invocation is incorrect.
>> The format string has one (1) %a conversion specification, but we pass
>> three (3) arguments.
>>
>> I think the last argument ("condition is invalid!\n") should actually be
>> part of the format string. And then, the "before"/"after" string has to
>> be printed somehow as well.
>>
>> Another superficial observation below:
>>
>>> +/**
>>> + Check sorted CPU features' relationship, ASSERT invalid one.
>>> +
>>> + @param[in] FeatureList The pointer to CPU feature list.
>>> +**/
>>> +VOID
>>> +CheckCpuFeaturesRelationShip (
>>
>> I don't think we should capitalize "Ship" in this identifier.
>>
>> Third comment: there are several ways to define "sorting", so I'm not
>> sure my question applies, but: can we replace the manual sorting with
>> SortLib?
>
> Laszlo,
> I haven't checked the patch in details.
> But regarding to the SortLib suggestion, the feature entry is chained in
> linked list, while SortLib can only perform sorting in array.
>
> Bin,
> Can we have a simpler fix to this issue?
> If my understanding is correct, the patch tries to fix the infinite loop
> in code.
> If that's true, can we just firstly calculate how many loops are
> expected before looping, then exit when the maximum loop is met?
> Upon that, when the sort hasn't been finished, a wrong dependency
> exists.
I wonder how the algorithm works right now; why is an infinite loop
possible in the first place?
I don't remember working with topological (= dependency) sorting in the
last 15 years :) , but I believe "non-termination" is not the expected
behavior for a dependency graph that has a cycle.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_sorting
Anyway, if we'd like to find out whether a singly-linked list is looped,
a maximum list length can be enforced (like you say), or there's the
"trick" where one pointer advances 1 node and another pointer advances 2
nodes, and the faster pointer catches up with the slower one.
(Sorry I have no idea how the current algorithm works.)
Thanks
Laszlo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-02 1:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-31 7:00 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Enhance CPU feature dependency check Song, BinX
2018-01-31 7:41 ` Song, BinX
2018-01-31 9:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-01 2:09 ` Song, BinX
2018-02-01 13:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-02 1:34 ` Song, BinX
2018-02-01 5:10 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-02-01 13:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox