From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
"Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] MdeModulePkg: some PCI HC drivers: unmap common buffers at ExitBootServices()
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:11:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f8dd474-f594-088a-cc6c-e2b82810e4c1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503A9A8EE2@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 09/07/17 06:34, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> Thanks.
> It seems the discussion becomes too long. I try to make it short.
>
>
> 1) As long as we use same mechanism to handle both common buffer and read/write buffer. I have no concern at all. :)
>
>
> 2) I am sorry that I do not have an immediate answer for your question on event handling in ExitBootServices.
> Although it seems tricky, I believe it works. Can you have a try?
>
>
> 3) Looking at the code (DxeMain.c), I have another idea for your consideration only.
>
> //
> // Notify other drivers that we are exiting boot services.
> //
> CoreNotifySignalList (&gEfiEventExitBootServicesGuid);
>
> //
> // Report that ExitBootServices() has been called
> //
> REPORT_STATUS_CODE (
> EFI_PROGRESS_CODE,
> (EFI_SOFTWARE_EFI_BOOT_SERVICE | EFI_SW_BS_PC_EXIT_BOOT_SERVICES)
> );
>
> The cleanup driver may register a report status code handle to do the cleanup. :)
>
> We already have such example in MdeModulePkg\Universal\Acpi\FirmwarePerformanceDataTableDxe\ FirmwarePerformanceDxe.c.
> FpdtStatusCodeListenerDxe()
>
> } else if (Value == (EFI_SOFTWARE_EFI_BOOT_SERVICE | EFI_SW_BS_PC_EXIT_BOOT_SERVICES)) {
> ......
>
> The requirement will become: If a platform wants to add cleanup, it must use a real report status code library.
I think I prefer option #2; it presents fewer requirements for the platform.
In addition: I've just realized that we don't need the UEFI spec to
promise us that option #2 works. We only have to care whether it works
in edk2.
The reason is that EDKII_IOMMU_PROTOCOL is *already* edk2-specific; it
is a platform (DXE) driver, not a UEFI driver. In other words, we would
use option #2 only inside edk2.
So, I'll try option #2.
Thanks!
Laszlo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-07 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-03 19:54 [PATCH 0/4] MdeModulePkg: some PCI HC drivers: unmap common buffers at ExitBootServices() Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-03 19:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] MdeModulePkg/UhciDxe: unmap BM common buffers when exiting boot services Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-03 19:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] MdeModulePkg/EhciDxe: " Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-03 19:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] MdeModulePkg/XhciDxe: " Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-03 19:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] MdeModulePkg/AtaAtapiPassThru: unmap common buffers at ExitBootServices() Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-04 10:36 ` [PATCH 0/4] MdeModulePkg: some PCI HC drivers: " Zeng, Star
2017-09-04 21:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-05 2:18 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-09-05 9:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-05 13:44 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-09-05 17:57 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-06 4:37 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-09-06 12:14 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-06 15:39 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-07 4:46 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-09-07 11:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-07 14:40 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-07 14:48 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-09-07 16:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-07 4:34 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-09-07 12:11 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f8dd474-f594-088a-cc6c-e2b82810e4c1@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox