From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.6279.1587574098184726880 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:48:18 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.231, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRIXo-00053G-CG; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:48:16 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jRIXn-0007hT-R4; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:48:16 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1182160F79; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:48:15 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id KnIqJ5ns_axG; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:48:15 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (muon.bluestop.org [65.103.231.193]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0867F160F5D; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:48:14 -0600 (MDT) To: Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Jordan Justen , Ard Biesheuvel , Leif Lindholm , Michael Kinney , Andrew Fish , Peter Grehan References: <20200421030955.114850-1-rebecca@bsdio.com> <18aaab30-4960-c923-5895-bd097008e677@redhat.com> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: <0fdda372-5871-60e3-b407-bce1225c0ad8@bsdio.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:48:13 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <18aaab30-4960-c923-5895-bd097008e677@redhat.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1jRIXn-0007hT-R4;;;mid=<0fdda372-5871-60e3-b407-bce1225c0ad8@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.67;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,TooManyTo_001, XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4971] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 316 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 10 (3.2%), b_tie_ro: 9 (2.7%), parse: 1.09 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 4.2 (1.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.52 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.0 (0.9%), tests_pri_-950: 1.44 (0.5%), tests_pri_-900: 1.16 (0.4%), tests_pri_-90: 59 (18.6%), check_bayes: 57 (18.0%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.8%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (1.7%), b_comp_prob: 2.1 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 40 (12.5%), b_finish: 1.10 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 220 (69.5%), check_dkim_signature: 0.83 (0.3%), check_dkim_adsp: 42 (13.2%), poll_dns_idle: 34 (10.6%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.7%), tests_pri_500: 12 (3.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add BhyvePkg, to support the bhyve hypervisor X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 4/22/20 9:21 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > OK, that makes sense -- but, without the ResetSystemLib instance, are > you able to boot the BhyvePkg platform firmware in a bhyve guest? Does > (for example) the "reset -c" UEFI Shell command work? "reset -c" works, but "reset -s" doesn't. But that's a long-standing bug, going back to the UDK2014-based builds so I don't think it's ever worked. > Does the ResetSystem runtime service work, in v3? Rebooting works, but powering off doesn't, but as mentioned above that's not a regression. -- Rebecca Cran