From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] EDK2 UEFI Specification and Revision To: Andrew Fish ,devel@edk2.groups.io From: sergestus@yandex.ru X-Originating-Location: Molokovo, Moscow Oblast, RU (79.133.79.22) X-Originating-Platform: Windows Chrome 77 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 03:13:34 -0700 References: <780E0660-7D49-412B-B535-2491D8C408D9@apple.com> In-Reply-To: <780E0660-7D49-412B-B535-2491D8C408D9@apple.com> Message-ID: <10305.1571739214297357041@groups.io> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="kAlYmLmwxVx2RK0A6M2R" --kAlYmLmwxVx2RK0A6M2R Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrew, Thank you, for the detail answer. It seems this is what I'm looking for. N= ow I've found the UEFI specification of the UEFI application I build, and i= t appears that the specification of the application is greater than the EFI= Shall specification it is going to be used with. Is it ok, or I should fin= d the EDK2 with UEFI specification exactly the same as the EFI Shell specif= ication and rebuild my EFI app? Thank you, Sergey --kAlYmLmwxVx2RK0A6M2R Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrew,

Thank you, for the detail answer. It seems this is wh= at I'm looking for. Now I've found the UEFI specification of the UEFI appli= cation I build, and it appears that the specification of the application is= greater than the EFI Shall specification it is going to be used with. Is i= t ok, or I should find the EDK2 with UEFI specification exactly the same as= the EFI Shell specification and rebuild my EFI app?

Thank you,<= br />Sergey --kAlYmLmwxVx2RK0A6M2R--