From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>,
Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] BaseTools/Scripts: Add GitPostCommitHook.py
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 20:24:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1059bc3f-2016-2bac-4e7a-43bb6ee0a723@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191205161234.25071-4-philmd@redhat.com>
On 12/05/19 17:12, Philippe Mathieu-Daude wrote:
> Git allows the use of various hooks (see [*]). In particular it
> provides the 'post-commit' hook, which is a convenient place to
> run the PatchCheck script.
>
> [*] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Customizing-Git-Git-Hooks
>
> Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
> I'm hitting a egg/chicken problem here.
>
> If I add this script without CRLF, PatchCheck complains:
>
> Code format is not valid:
> * Line ending ('\n') is not CRLF
> File: BaseTools/Scripts/GitPostCommitHook.py
> Line: #!/usr/bin/python
>
> However if I convert it to CRLF, then Linux does not recognize the
> shebang, and if I symlink the script, when the hook is executed I get:
>
> fatal: cannot run .git/hooks/post-commit: No such file or directory
>
> Because the interpreter expects the shebang line with Unix line ending
> (linefeed only).
(1) To my understanding (and I could be wrong), we don't add shebangs to
python code in edk2 that is supposed to be run on both Windows and
Linux. Removing the shebang altogether would solve your problem.
The new problem is then: how to invoke the new script, from a git hook.
I *feel* (but I'm unsure) that this is going to be OS-specific anyway,
is it not? See for example the python scripts in BaseTools -- we have
OS-specific wrappers for them:
BaseTools/BinWrappers/PosixLike/build
BaseTools/BinWrappers/WindowsLike/build.bat
After you source "edksetup.sh", or else run "edksetup.bat", the proper
wrapper will be used, when you subsequently type "build".
So I think something similar would be necessary for a git hook too. (TBH
I don't even know how git hooks are supposed to look & work on Windows
-- but on Linux anyway, it could be a shell script that explicitly
launches the python intepreter, with "GitPostCommitHook.py").
>
> As a kludge I'm happy using:
>
> $ echo > .git/hooks/post-commit
> #!/bin/sh
> test -e BaseTools/Scripts/GitPostCommitHook.py && exec python3 BaseTools/Scripts/GitPostCommitHook.py
> EOF
> $ chmod +x .git/hooks/post-commit
>
> (The 'test' allow to checkout to older references where the script
> is not available).
Right, exactly -- this is not even a "kludge", but it approaches what I
think is our existing practice.
Just drop the shebang from the new python script, and locate the python
interpreter more flexibly (like the BinWrappers do). You could even
introduce the necessary BinWrapper(s), and then invoke that from the hook.
(BTW I mean the above only as food for thought & discussion, not as
something that you "must" implement.)
(2) I'd like to mention a scenario that makes me think twice about any
commit-related hook that can fail (i.e., exit with nonzero status):
What if you are in the middle of a complex rebase, stage the new changes
for the currently revised patch, and then run "git rebase --continue"
(expecting an automatic amendment, without explicitly running "git
commit --amend" first)?
I don't know how git-rebase behaves when such a hook fails
mid-processing. And I don't really want to find out :)
Hmmm, wait, let me see githooks(5):
post-commit
This hook is invoked by git-commit(1). It takes no parameters,
and is invoked after a commit is made.
This hook is meant primarily for notification, and cannot
affect the outcome of git commit.
That's in fact reassuring! It means that, whatever happens in this hook,
it cannot break git-rebase. That's nice. So there is no concern in that
regard.
I think this (good) behavior should be mentioned in the commit message
(or even in the script).
So...
>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> ---
> BaseTools/Scripts/GitPostCommitHook.py | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 BaseTools/Scripts/GitPostCommitHook.py
>
> diff --git a/BaseTools/Scripts/GitPostCommitHook.py b/BaseTools/Scripts/GitPostCommitHook.py
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..4ea933a7eedf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/BaseTools/Scripts/GitPostCommitHook.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/python
I think the shebang shoud go, and...
> +## @file
> +# Run PatchCheck on the last commit.
> +#
> +# Copyright (c) 2019, Red Hat, Inc.
> +#
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> +#
> +# To have git run this script after each commit, create a symbolic
> +# link or copy it to .git/hooks/post-commit in your EDK2 repository.
these instructions should be updated, according to (1).
Thanks,
Laszlo
> +
> +import os
> +import sys
> +
> +if __name__ == '__main__':
> + sys.path.append(os.path.join(os.environ['EDK_TOOLS_PATH'], 'Scripts'))
> + from PatchCheck import CheckGitCommits, Verbose
> + Verbose.level = Verbose.QUIET
> + GIT_REFERENCE = 'HEAD'
> + COMMIT_COUNT = 1
> + sys.exit(CheckGitCommits(GIT_REFERENCE, COMMIT_COUNT).ok)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-05 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-05 16:12 [PATCH 0/6] BaseTools: Improve PatchCheck and add GitPostCommitHook Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-05 16:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] BaseTools/PatchCheck: Stop parsing commit message after --- separator Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-05 19:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-05 16:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] BaseTools/PatchCheck: Add a --quiet option Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-05 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] BaseTools/Scripts: Add GitPostCommitHook.py Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-05 19:24 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-12-05 16:12 ` [PATCH 4/6] BaseTools/PatchCheck: Extract the run_git() function Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-05 16:12 ` [PATCH 5/6] BaseTools/PatchCheck: Add printw() function to print warnings Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-05 16:12 ` [PATCH 6/6] BaseTools/PatchCheck: Allow to print colored warnings Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1059bc3f-2016-2bac-4e7a-43bb6ee0a723@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox