From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.22736.1683278042810080687 for ; Fri, 05 May 2023 02:14:03 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="signature has expired" header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=fm1 header.b=r4Ztai3/; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 66.111.4.27, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6225C0284; Fri, 5 May 2023 05:14:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 May 2023 05:14:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdio.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1683278041; x=1683364441; bh=znuAkClwnM4cFaHi95KaiDuwvUwqGFrsI5P QboaDrTk=; b=r4Ztai3/w9Kpxr5er+Kift8pxRQx+HZ2Fck49GTV/xJqww5HJFn rVJJ4S8pl7BV/FdKNJoL++ba9OLQFJj5DBkY0S5PUu5xfU3cB0rHg/DnsGmiUgHh uYFofdetc1DNWZ4zRt2TUzdoEMr4bfUCu/WvdJ14kUPXKP5v9He4y96MJyzY8DkI 3YlpBVkQCVoUBHNgzuCH9IYi33eM0Xx7eqT8Ky1KYXuwq66zCtVZLvF0lYqWxsei yPUBEXczgk+ebdHQiSUHXV/unjIpiH6O5PA85DY3k6FxqY5n3U8rPtkMOZ/9ICvd u6awEgq3X91amKKuNrl+42dAU5Bh5Jkd+Sg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1683278041; x= 1683364441; bh=znuAkClwnM4cFaHi95KaiDuwvUwqGFrsI5PQboaDrTk=; b=j L4O71fCz270XSt7Y7yyjGu3rIzQitFTfRqcR85au++peTkEA94doo/GqEarT2TC9 jmkfimIPu1rZ1GRADuyjr8iGI33GhO6dww4N9tKkoap6KoZUBkLMw8b9prtjnQyP 0Q6Wofu8ZkGFu+fmvAs9/6OdEUXS0TEjWmm+ZKVI4biALbtKZmrV1XipC9Je1eEl 0uJpIgKZHKG0DwmpQkjfGQTMwcZlb6b80YwpSHr9sOsTjFODTrw9LUaccmKtD8O8 L6jtXnpYRpxEv/7LrPkWwmn7ricIggtQ/wQc+7MiF82LPtAm1v2pOk3VBFT/9u5N SAuA2Y/XpC3vagv3NOTmQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfeefvddgudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedftfgv sggvtggtrgcuvehrrghnfdcuoehrvggsvggttggrsegsshguihhordgtohhmqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpefhtdefueetgedugefhgfelkeevveevhfdvueelfffgjeeujedvgfef teduhfetjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehrvggsvggttggrsegsshguihhordgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i5b994698:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 814152D40074; Fri, 5 May 2023 05:14:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-386-g2404815117-fm-20230425.001-g24048151 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <10d42b47-3ee1-40d0-a44f-13c68f14398c@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <00e801d97f24$f9033ef0$eb09bcd0$@byosoft.com.cn> References: <20230501160839.884391-1-rebecca@bsdio.com> <20230501160839.884391-9-rebecca@bsdio.com> <8387e266-9e03-38ea-340b-2db994971bd0@bsdio.com> <86788472-2e1d-fa5d-30f1-9b2a7f139339@bsdio.com> <001d01d97ef5$4d941d20$e8bc5760$@byosoft.com.cn> <00e801d97f24$f9033ef0$eb09bcd0$@byosoft.com.cn> Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 03:14:01 -0600 From: "Rebecca Cran" To: devel@edk2.groups.io, gaoliming , "Jiewen Yao" , "'Wang, Jian J'" , "'Lu, Xiaoyu1'" , "'Jiang, Guomin'" , "Andrew Fish" , "'Ni, Ray'" , "'Chiu, Chasel'" , "'Desimone, Nathaniel L'" , "'Zeng, Star'" Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v6 08/16] Add GCC and GCCNOLTO toolchains to tools_def.txt and update packages Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 5, 2023, at 1:41 AM, gaoliming via groups.io wrote: > Rebecca: > This patch makes the changes cross the different packages. So, it ma= y=20 > bring the confuse to the different package maintainers. Can these=20 > changes be separated for the different packages? > Yes, I can send the changes that haven=E2=80=99t had reviews yet as new = separate patches. And to avoid further delay and reduce confusion, I can merge the patches= which have already been reviewed. Rebecca