public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sean" <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
To: Heng Luo <heng.luo@intel.com>,devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] BaseTools/Scripts: Add scripts to set PACKAGES_PATH environment
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 08:59:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12020.1585843155300456222@groups.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200402080809.2147-1-heng.luo@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 956 bytes --]

I am not a fan of this.  The community and design meetings have had a few discussions about tools (PyTools has been presented twice) and a few brief discussions about common patterns to build platforms but I don't think there is real alignment.  Each "platform" has its own way of doing things.

As for this patch, I don't really want to see a bunch of scripts added to edk2 basetools that are not aligned with a community agreed direction (or any clear direction).  It has also been brought up that basetools as a python package/project is a challenge to work with and has some fundamental problems.  Adding more in a similar design pattern is not how we start fixing it.   As an example for edk2-pytools, an RFC was offered and even then it was added as its own repositories to avoid more directly to the edk2 repo.

@Mike K - Any progress on getting a tools subtream setup?  Any governance ideas to help align these efforts.

Thanks
Sean

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1043 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-02 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-02  8:08 [PATCH] BaseTools/Scripts: Add scripts to set PACKAGES_PATH environment Heng Luo
2020-04-02 15:59 ` Sean [this message]
2020-04-07  2:15   ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2020-04-07  3:37     ` Bob Feng
2020-04-07  5:56       ` Sean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12020.1585843155300456222@groups.io \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox