From: "Sami Mujawar" <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, Sahil <Sahil@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>,
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms][PATCH V3 1/1] Silicon/ARM/NeoverseN1Soc: Update CCIX PNP ID
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:11:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <121eee9e-8dee-d8cd-2b2c-4b2d7aa825fb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <172ED26EFF10A09A.9474@groups.io>
Merged as f0385722832d..df870c7beaee
Thanks.
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
On 08/12/2022 12:51 pm, Sami Mujawar via groups.io wrote:
> HI Sahil,
>
> Thank you for the updated patch.
> These changes look good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sami Mujawar
>
> On 08/12/2022, 12:07, "sahil" <sahil@arm.com> wrote:
>
> The PNP ID 0x0A09 used for CCIX host bridge in the current code is
> not defined in any specification and is therefore incorrect.
>
> Also, there is no need for a separate ID for CCIX host bridge,
> for the following reasons:
>
> 1. CCIX doesn't have any host specific requirements/ingredients as such.
> 2. CCIX protocol messages flow over regular PCIe.
> 3. CCIX devices and root ports are natively discovered using the CCIX DVSEC.
>
> Therefore, reuse PCIe PNP ID for CCIX.
>
> Signed-off-by: sahil <sahil@arm.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v3:
> - added more info regarding the change in commit message [Sami Mujawar]
> v2:
> - removed licence fix, to be pushed in separate patch [Leif Lindholm]
>
> Silicon/ARM/NeoverseN1Soc/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Silicon/ARM/NeoverseN1Soc/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c b/Silicon/ARM/NeoverseN1Soc/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c
> index 1f38f654a8ce..6a154d771126 100644
> --- a/Silicon/ARM/NeoverseN1Soc/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c
> +++ b/Silicon/ARM/NeoverseN1Soc/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c
> @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ STATIC EFI_PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_DEVICE_PATH mEfiPciRootBridgeDevicePath[ROOT_COMPLEX_
> (UINT8)(sizeof (ACPI_HID_DEVICE_PATH) >> 8)
>
> }
>
> },
>
> - EISA_PNP_ID(0x0A09), // CCIX
>
> - 0
>
> + EISA_PNP_ID(0x0A08), // CCIX
>
> + 1
>
> },
>
> {
>
> END_DEVICE_PATH_TYPE,
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-08 12:07 [edk2-platforms][PATCH V3 1/1] Silicon/ARM/NeoverseN1Soc: Update CCIX PNP ID sahil
2022-12-08 12:51 ` Sami Mujawar
[not found] ` <172ED26EFF10A09A.9474@groups.io>
2022-12-13 13:11 ` Sami Mujawar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=121eee9e-8dee-d8cd-2b2c-4b2d7aa825fb@arm.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox