From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rebecca@bluestop.org>
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom;
 client-ip=96.73.9.1; helo=muon.bluestop.org;
 envelope-from=rebecca@bluestop.org; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org 
Received: from muon.bluestop.org (muon.bluestop.org [96.73.9.1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF972033D1B7
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Wed,  2 May 2018 11:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from muon.bluestop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by muon.bluestop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848F45B4E3;
 Wed,  2 May 2018 12:32:03 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from muon.bluestop.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by muon.bluestop.org (muon.bluestop.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id 7GNSLqFU4WpG; Wed,  2 May 2018 12:32:02 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from [10.86.56.174] (rap-us.hgst.com [199.255.44.250])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by muon.bluestop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
 Wed,  2 May 2018 12:32:02 -0600 (MDT)
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Evan Lloyd <Evan.Lloyd@arm.com>,
 "ruiyu.ni@intel.com" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel (edk2-devel@lists.01.org)" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
References: <HE1PR0801MB1771A225568F69513503293E8B8F0@HE1PR0801MB1771.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <69dccdf5-9397-3bdc-0b89-66361a685719@redhat.com>
 <DB6PR08MB2806CEA148FC101FC1A1C1818B800@DB6PR08MB2806.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <948ba2ee-1f88-a346-14c8-815fb9b835c8@redhat.com>
From: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bluestop.org>
Message-ID: <12a7e14c-ca35-7a1a-8dcf-9aea25d2af2a@bluestop.org>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 12:31:57 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <948ba2ee-1f88-a346-14c8-815fb9b835c8@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Incorrect Author on patch
X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: EDK II Development  <edk2-devel.lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 18:32:00 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US

On 5/2/2018 7:40 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:

> On 05/02/18 14:46, Evan Lloyd wrote:
>>   I can well understand why it would be useful to use Gerrit as a means
>>   of reviewing a patch - actually a brilliant idea,
> (actually, *not* a brilliant idea, but that's just my opinion :) )

*Please* not Gerrit. If we're going to use a code review system, please 
let us choose Phabricator. It has a much nicer user interface.
You can see an example of the review requests it creates at 
https://reviews.freebsd.org/differential/ .

-- 
Rebecca