From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Requestion for LTS version on EDK2
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
From: "liyi 00215672" <phoenix.liyi@Huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: 206.16.17.150
User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:17:50 -0700
Message-ID: <13372.1555571870534300928@groups.io>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="pArzADtV1TRdkBFDIm3f"

--pArzADtV1TRdkBFDIm3f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Guys,
Backgroud: If we choose one stable-tag as our own UEFI codebase, however a=
fter 3 years, there are so many new features(but we don't need) will be add=
ed into EDK2 main tree.

Requestion: Could EDK2 community plan or maintain "LTS version" concept li=
ke Linux? On LTS version , we only make bug fix or security-related.

--pArzADtV1TRdkBFDIm3f
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>Hi Guys,<br />Backgroud: If we choose one stable-tag as our own UEFI cod=
ebase, however after 3 years, there are so many new features(but we don't n=
eed) will be added into EDK2 main tree.</p>
<p>Requestion: Could EDK2 community plan or maintain "LTS version" concept=
 like Linux? On LTS version , we only make bug fix or security-related.</p>

--pArzADtV1TRdkBFDIm3f--