From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.319.1585608324128048110 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:45:24 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.233, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJ39m-0001HB-UM; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:45:23 -0600 Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.69]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jJ39m-000666-2s; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:45:22 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F53A1280618; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:45:21 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta5.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta5.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2Q9vivRrcUM6; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:45:21 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (muon.bluestop.org [65.103.231.193]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 597741280422; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:45:21 -0600 (MDT) To: devel@edk2.groups.io, sean.brogan@microsoft.com, Michael D Kinney References: <32286.1585604522958944186@groups.io> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: <13558dbe-7609-c5be-78f7-ce2b5f9116cb@bsdio.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:45:20 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <32286.1585604522958944186@groups.io> X-XM-SPF: eid=1jJ39m-000666-2s;;;mid=<13558dbe-7609-c5be-78f7-ce2b5f9116cb@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.69;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,TooManyTo_001, TooManyTo_002,XMSubLong,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5051] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa08 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;devel@edk2.groups.io, sean.brogan@microsoft.com, Michael D Kinney X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 556 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 13 (2.3%), b_tie_ro: 11 (2.0%), parse: 0.94 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 13 (2.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.80 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.3 (0.8%), tests_pri_-950: 1.40 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.25 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 210 (37.7%), check_bayes: 203 (36.5%), b_tokenize: 4.1 (0.7%), b_tok_get_all: 146 (26.3%), b_comp_prob: 2.9 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 45 (8.1%), b_finish: 1.49 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 300 (54.0%), check_dkim_signature: 0.50 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 146 (26.2%), poll_dns_idle: 137 (24.6%), tests_pri_10: 2.3 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 7 (1.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] .azurepipelines: Enable CI for OvmfPkg and EmulatorPkg X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US On 3/30/20 3:42 PM, Sean via Groups.Io wrote: > @Rebecca - Agree.  I need to package up a newer version.  I have > treated this as lower priority.  Is there a feature you need or just > best practices on keeping current? Just best practices around keeping current. I don't think it's a problem just now, but I start getting anxious when I see software being used that's _several_ years old, unsupported and there's a fairly straightforward upgrade path. -- Rebecca Cran