Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] Add BhyvePkg, to support the bhyve hypervisor

["Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>]

On 04/24/20 07:54, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> 
>> On Apr 23, 2020, at 3:42 AM, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> BUt, I *think* the language seen in "OvmfPkg/License.txt" should
>> accommodate that too. It goes:
>>
>>  Some files are subject to the following license, the [...] license.
>>  Those files are located in:
>>  - [directory]
>>  - [directory]
>>
>> It says "some files", and where they are. It doesn't seem to imply that
>> *all* files under those directories are covered by the non-default license.
>>
>> So please just list all those module directories in this (non-default)
>> part of "BhyvePkg/License.txt" that have *at least one* file covered by
>> "BSD-2-Clause".
> 
> 
> Would it also be ok to use the following language?
> 
> Some files are subject to the following license, the BSD-2-Clause license.
> Those files are located in:
> 
> AcpiPlatformDxe/Bhyve.c
> PlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> PlatformPei/Platform.c

probably "located *at*" (not "in"), if we are listing the files
themselves. And yes, this is entirely OK, as long as you can collect
those files individually!

> I think I’ve fixed the rest of the changes you’ve requested. I’m ready to send the v4 series once I get clarification about whether I should add my own copyright line to files I’ve copied from OvmfPkg and made no changes to, or only deletions or other very minor changes.

I've attempted to answer that under your other email.

Thanks!
Laszlo