public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RESEND PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Bit width adaption in ASSERT()
@ 2016-10-21  5:50 Dennis Chen
  2016-10-21  8:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dennis Chen @ 2016-10-21  5:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: edk2-devel; +Cc: nd, Dennis Chen, Ard Biesheuvel, Leif Lindholm, Laszlo Ersek

Since All the GIC base address variables has been aligned to 64-bit, it 
doesn't make sense to continue use MAX_UINT32 in ASSERT() statement, so 
this patch uses MAX_UINTN to adapt to this kind of change.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
---
 ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
index 64afc4d..6488061 100644
--- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
+++ b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
@@ -79,11 +79,11 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
 
     // RegProp[0..1] == { GICD base, GICD size }
     DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
-    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
+    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINTN);
 
     // RegProp[2..3] == { GICR base, GICR size }
     RedistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
-    ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINT32);
+    ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINTN);
 
     PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
     PcdSet64 (PcdGicRedistributorsBase, RedistBase);
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
 
     DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
     CpuBase  = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
-    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
-    ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINT32);
+    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINTN);
+    ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINTN);
 
     PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
     PcdSet64 (PcdGicInterruptInterfaceBase, CpuBase);
-- 
2.7.4



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Bit width adaption in ASSERT()
  2016-10-21  5:50 [RESEND PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Bit width adaption in ASSERT() Dennis Chen
@ 2016-10-21  8:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
  2016-10-21  8:21   ` Ard Biesheuvel
  2016-10-24  3:01   ` Dennis Chen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo Ersek @ 2016-10-21  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dennis Chen, edk2-devel; +Cc: nd, Leif Lindholm, Ard Biesheuvel

On 10/21/16 07:50, Dennis Chen wrote:
> Since All the GIC base address variables has been aligned to 64-bit, it 
> doesn't make sense to continue use MAX_UINT32 in ASSERT() statement, so 
> this patch uses MAX_UINTN to adapt to this kind of change.
> 
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
> ---
>  ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> index 64afc4d..6488061 100644
> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> @@ -79,11 +79,11 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
>  
>      // RegProp[0..1] == { GICD base, GICD size }
>      DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
> -    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
> +    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINTN);
>  
>      // RegProp[2..3] == { GICR base, GICR size }
>      RedistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
> -    ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINT32);
> +    ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINTN);
>  
>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicRedistributorsBase, RedistBase);
> @@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
>  
>      DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
>      CpuBase  = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
> -    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
> -    ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINT32);
> +    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINTN);
> +    ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINTN);
>  
>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicInterruptInterfaceBase, CpuBase);
> 

Ard, can you please handle this iteration of the patch as well?

I do have one suggestion, for the subject:

ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtGicArchLib: adapt ASSERT()s to 64-bit base addresses

If you guys agree, I think it can be done on commit. With that,

Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Thanks
Laszlo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Bit width adaption in ASSERT()
  2016-10-21  8:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
@ 2016-10-21  8:21   ` Ard Biesheuvel
  2016-10-24  3:01   ` Dennis Chen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2016-10-21  8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laszlo Ersek; +Cc: Dennis Chen, edk2-devel@lists.01.org, nd, Leif Lindholm

On 21 October 2016 at 09:02, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/21/16 07:50, Dennis Chen wrote:
>> Since All the GIC base address variables has been aligned to 64-bit, it
>> doesn't make sense to continue use MAX_UINT32 in ASSERT() statement, so
>> this patch uses MAX_UINTN to adapt to this kind of change.
>>
>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c | 8 ++++----
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
>> index 64afc4d..6488061 100644
>> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
>> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
>> @@ -79,11 +79,11 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
>>
>>      // RegProp[0..1] == { GICD base, GICD size }
>>      DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
>> -    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
>> +    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINTN);
>>
>>      // RegProp[2..3] == { GICR base, GICR size }
>>      RedistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
>> -    ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINT32);
>> +    ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINTN);
>>
>>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
>>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicRedistributorsBase, RedistBase);
>> @@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
>>
>>      DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
>>      CpuBase  = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
>> -    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
>> -    ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINT32);
>> +    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINTN);
>> +    ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINTN);
>>
>>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
>>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicInterruptInterfaceBase, CpuBase);
>>
>
> Ard, can you please handle this iteration of the patch as well?
>

Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

> I do have one suggestion, for the subject:
>
> ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtGicArchLib: adapt ASSERT()s to 64-bit base addresses
>
> If you guys agree, I think it can be done on commit. With that,
>
> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>

Agreed

Pushed as 041e842ab7b3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Bit width adaption in ASSERT()
  2016-10-21  8:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
  2016-10-21  8:21   ` Ard Biesheuvel
@ 2016-10-24  3:01   ` Dennis Chen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dennis Chen @ 2016-10-24  3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laszlo Ersek; +Cc: edk2-devel, nd, Leif Lindholm, Ard Biesheuvel

Hello Laszlo,

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:02:45AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/21/16 07:50, Dennis Chen wrote:
> > Since All the GIC base address variables has been aligned to 64-bit, it 
> > doesn't make sense to continue use MAX_UINT32 in ASSERT() statement, so 
> > this patch uses MAX_UINTN to adapt to this kind of change.
> > 
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> > index 64afc4d..6488061 100644
> > --- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> > +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> > @@ -79,11 +79,11 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
> >  
> >      // RegProp[0..1] == { GICD base, GICD size }
> >      DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
> > -    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
> > +    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINTN);
> >  
> >      // RegProp[2..3] == { GICR base, GICR size }
> >      RedistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
> > -    ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINT32);
> > +    ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINTN);
> >  
> >      PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
> >      PcdSet64 (PcdGicRedistributorsBase, RedistBase);
> > @@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
> >  
> >      DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
> >      CpuBase  = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
> > -    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
> > -    ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINT32);
> > +    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINTN);
> > +    ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINTN);
> >  
> >      PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
> >      PcdSet64 (PcdGicInterruptInterfaceBase, CpuBase);
> > 
> 
> Ard, can you please handle this iteration of the patch as well?
> 
> I do have one suggestion, for the subject:
> 
> ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtGicArchLib: adapt ASSERT()s to 64-bit base addresses
> 
> If you guys agree, I think it can be done on commit. With that,
>

I think Ard will not have any reason to reject this nice suggestion :), so do I.
so it's a deal...

Thanks,
Dennis

> 
> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks
> Laszlo
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-24  3:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-21  5:50 [RESEND PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Bit width adaption in ASSERT() Dennis Chen
2016-10-21  8:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-21  8:21   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-24  3:01   ` Dennis Chen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox