From: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>,
Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpu: Correct exception message.
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 22:26:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479911218-34804-1-git-send-email-jiewen.yao@intel.com> (raw)
This patch fixes the first part of
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242
Previously, when SMM exception happens, "stack overflow" is misreported.
This patch checked the PF address to see it is stack overflow, or
it is caused by SMM page protection.
It dumps exception data, PF address and the module trigger the issue.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/PageTbl.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++--
UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmProfile.h | 9 +++++
UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/PageTbl.c b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/PageTbl.c
index 5033bc5..39e6c9a 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/PageTbl.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/PageTbl.c
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ SmiPFHandler (
)
{
UINTN PFAddress;
+ UINTN GuardPageAddress;
+ UINTN CpuIndex;
ASSERT (InterruptType == EXCEPT_IA32_PAGE_FAULT);
@@ -98,10 +100,40 @@ SmiPFHandler (
PFAddress = AsmReadCr2 ();
- if ((FeaturePcdGet (PcdCpuSmmStackGuard)) &&
- (PFAddress >= mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase) &&
+ //
+ // If a page fault occurs in SMRAM range, it might be in a SMM stack guard page,
+ // or SMM page protection violation.
+ //
+ if ((PFAddress >= mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase) &&
(PFAddress < (mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase + mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrSize))) {
- DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM stack overflow!\n"));
+ CpuIndex = GetCpuIndex ();
+ GuardPageAddress = (mSmmStackArrayBase + EFI_PAGE_SIZE + CpuIndex * mSmmStackSize);
+ if ((FeaturePcdGet (PcdCpuSmmStackGuard)) &&
+ (PFAddress >= GuardPageAddress) &&
+ (PFAddress < (GuardPageAddress + EFI_PAGE_SIZE))) {
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM stack overflow!\n"));
+ } else {
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM exception data - 0x%x(", SystemContext.SystemContextIa32->ExceptionData));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "I:%x, R:%x, U:%x, W:%X, P:%x",
+ (SystemContext.SystemContextIa32->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_ID) != 0,
+ (SystemContext.SystemContextIa32->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_RSVD) != 0,
+ (SystemContext.SystemContextIa32->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_US) != 0,
+ (SystemContext.SystemContextIa32->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_WR) != 0,
+ (SystemContext.SystemContextIa32->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_P) != 0
+ ));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, ")\n", SystemContext.SystemContextIa32->ExceptionData));
+ if ((SystemContext.SystemContextIa32->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_ID) != 0) {
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM exception at execution (0x%x)\n", PFAddress));
+ DEBUG_CODE (
+ DumpModuleInfoByIp (*(UINTN *)(UINTN)SystemContext.SystemContextIa32->Esp);
+ );
+ } else {
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM exception at access (0x%x)\n", PFAddress));
+ DEBUG_CODE (
+ DumpModuleInfoByIp ((UINTN)SystemContext.SystemContextIa32->Eip);
+ );
+ }
+ }
CpuDeadLoop ();
}
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmProfile.h b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmProfile.h
index b6fb5cf..04a3dfb 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmProfile.h
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmProfile.h
@@ -105,6 +105,15 @@ InitPaging (
VOID
);
+/**
+ Get CPU Index from APIC ID.
+
+**/
+UINTN
+GetCpuIndex (
+ VOID
+ );
+
//
// The flag indicates if execute-disable is supported by processor.
//
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
index 531e188..94f2e03 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
@@ -804,6 +804,8 @@ SmiPFHandler (
)
{
UINTN PFAddress;
+ UINTN GuardPageAddress;
+ UINTN CpuIndex;
ASSERT (InterruptType == EXCEPT_IA32_PAGE_FAULT);
@@ -817,12 +819,39 @@ SmiPFHandler (
}
//
- // If a page fault occurs in SMRAM range, it should be in a SMM stack guard page.
+ // If a page fault occurs in SMRAM range, it might be in a SMM stack guard page,
+ // or SMM page protection violation.
//
- if ((FeaturePcdGet (PcdCpuSmmStackGuard)) &&
- (PFAddress >= mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase) &&
+ if ((PFAddress >= mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase) &&
(PFAddress < (mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase + mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrSize))) {
- DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM stack overflow!\n"));
+ CpuIndex = GetCpuIndex ();
+ GuardPageAddress = (mSmmStackArrayBase + EFI_PAGE_SIZE + CpuIndex * mSmmStackSize);
+ if ((FeaturePcdGet (PcdCpuSmmStackGuard)) &&
+ (PFAddress >= GuardPageAddress) &&
+ (PFAddress < (GuardPageAddress + EFI_PAGE_SIZE))) {
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM stack overflow!\n"));
+ } else {
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM exception data - 0x%lx(", SystemContext.SystemContextX64->ExceptionData));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "I:%x, R:%x, U:%x, W:%X, P:%x",
+ (SystemContext.SystemContextX64->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_ID) != 0,
+ (SystemContext.SystemContextX64->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_RSVD) != 0,
+ (SystemContext.SystemContextX64->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_US) != 0,
+ (SystemContext.SystemContextX64->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_WR) != 0,
+ (SystemContext.SystemContextX64->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_P) != 0
+ ));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, ")\n", SystemContext.SystemContextX64->ExceptionData));
+ if ((SystemContext.SystemContextX64->ExceptionData & IA32_PF_EC_ID) != 0) {
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM exception at execution (0x%lx)\n", PFAddress));
+ DEBUG_CODE (
+ DumpModuleInfoByIp (*(UINTN *)(UINTN)SystemContext.SystemContextX64->Rsp);
+ );
+ } else {
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SMM exception at access (0x%lx)\n", PFAddress));
+ DEBUG_CODE (
+ DumpModuleInfoByIp ((UINTN)SystemContext.SystemContextX64->Rip);
+ );
+ }
+ }
CpuDeadLoop ();
}
--
2.7.4.windows.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-11-23 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-23 14:26 Jiewen Yao [this message]
2016-11-23 16:37 ` [PATCH V3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpu: Correct exception message Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-24 2:01 ` Fan, Jeff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1479911218-34804-1-git-send-email-jiewen.yao@intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox