public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "MdePkg/ProcessorBind.h AARCH64: limit MAX_ADDRESS to 48 bits"
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 11:41:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14bc84c4-9b86-51b0-3b09-152e8877950c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181206213722.7597-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

On 12/06/18 22:37, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This reverts commit 82379bf6603274e81604d5a6f6bb14bdde616286.
> 
> On AArch64, we can only use 48 address bits while running in UEFI,
> while the GCD and UEFI memory maps may describe up to 52 bits of
> physical address space. For this reason, MAX_ADDRESS was reduced
> to 48 bits, to ensure that the firmware does not inadvertently
> attempt to allocate memory that we cannot access.
> 
> However, MAX_ADDRESS is used in runtime drivers as well, and
> runtime drivers may deal with kernel virtual addresses, which have
> bits [63:48] set. In fact, the OS may be running with 64 KB pages
> and pass addresses into the runtime services that use up to 52
> bits of address space, either with the top bits set or cleared,
> even if the physical address space does not extend beyond 48 bits.
> 
> In summary, changing MAX_ADDRESS is a mistake, and needs to be
> reverted.
> 
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
>  MdePkg/Include/AArch64/ProcessorBind.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/AArch64/ProcessorBind.h b/MdePkg/Include/AArch64/ProcessorBind.h
> index dad75df1c579..968c18f915ae 100644
> --- a/MdePkg/Include/AArch64/ProcessorBind.h
> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/AArch64/ProcessorBind.h
> @@ -138,9 +138,9 @@ typedef INT64   INTN;
>  #define MAX_2_BITS  0xC000000000000000ULL
>  
>  ///
> -/// Maximum legal AARCH64  address (48 bits for 4 KB page size)
> +/// Maximum legal AARCH64  address
>  ///
> -#define MAX_ADDRESS   0xFFFFFFFFFFFFULL
> +#define MAX_ADDRESS   0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL
>  
>  ///
>  /// Maximum legal AArch64 INTN and UINTN values.
> 

I was worried the patch could regress some things, but unfortunately, I
couldn't name any specific area of concern. Sorry about that.

For this change:

Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Topic change: the patch that's being reverted was originally posted as:

  [edk2] [PATCH v3 05/16]
  MdePkg/ProcessorBind.h AARCH64: limit MAX_ADDRESS to 48 bits

in the series

  [edk2] [PATCH v3 00/16]
  [Arm|ArmVirt|MdePkg|Embedded]Pkg: lift 40-bit IPA space limit

In further patches of that series, we depended on the lowered limit of
MAX_ADDRESS. Given that MAX_ADDRESS is being raised back to its original
value, I think those dependent locations should be re-checked.

For example, in

  [edk2] [PATCH v3 08/16]
  ArmPkg/ArmMmuLib: take the CPU supported maximum PA space into account

(commit e36b243c7178), we added

  //
  // Limit the virtual address space to what we can actually use: UEFI
  // mandates a 1:1 mapping, so no point in making the virtual address
  // space larger than the physical address space. We also have to take
  // into account the architectural limitations that result from UEFI's
  // use of 4 KB pages.
  //
  MaxAddress = MIN (LShiftU64 (1ULL, ArmGetPhysicalAddressBits ()) - 1,
                    MAX_ADDRESS);

Presumably, we should now replace MAX_ADDRESS with 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFULL.

(I'm unsure if other modules updated by the rest of the patches are
affected -- I tried to grep them for MAX_ADDRESS, and I couldn't find
any (obvious) matches.)

Thanks,
Laszlo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-07 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-06 21:37 [PATCH] Revert "MdePkg/ProcessorBind.h AARCH64: limit MAX_ADDRESS to 48 bits" Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-07  0:03 ` Gao, Liming
2018-12-07 10:41 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2018-12-07 10:43   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-07 11:26     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-07 11:54     ` Leif Lindholm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14bc84c4-9b86-51b0-3b09-152e8877950c@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox