From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 209.132.183.28, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by groups.io with SMTP; Tue, 21 May 2019 06:34:48 -0700 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEAD281E0F; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-194.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.194]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACDA610A1; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1b To: "Wang, Jian J" , "devel@edk2.groups.io" , "ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" Cc: "Lu, XiaoyuX" , "Ye, Ting" , Leif Lindholm , "Gao, Liming" References: <1557993298-22205-1-git-send-email-xiaoyux.lu@intel.com> <049e489c-b58f-0fc5-1c66-8ad920d93979@redhat.com> <0a6b50d4-3837-a5e6-7f3a-36386c65d42b@redhat.com> <75b13a2a-f570-97e9-a7df-5e24b2a2b22c@redhat.com> <15A0408CA29C0595.820@groups.io> From: "Laszlo Ersek" Message-ID: <14ebba0d-b5fc-8451-1dc9-ca1260786976@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 15:34:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Tue, 21 May 2019 13:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/21/19 15:02, Wang, Jian J wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of >> Laszlo Ersek >> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 8:24 PM >> To: Wang, Jian J ; devel@edk2.groups.io; >> ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org >> Cc: Lu, XiaoyuX ; Ye, Ting ; Leif >> Lindholm ; Gao, Liming >> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1b >> (2) NB, I think we can no longer merge this feature for >> edk2-stable201905. The soft feature freeze criterion is that all patches >> be reviewed (approved) on-list before the SFF date / announcement, and >> that was not fulfilled in this case. >> > > You're right. But we still need to complete the upgrade ASAP after stable tag. > There're several other features pending on it. True! >> (3) I can only report the failure that trips up the build for me. I did >> that here: >> >> http://mid.mail-archive.com/049e489c-b58f-0fc5-1c66- >> 8ad920d93979@redhat.com >> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/40823 >> >> >> Thus, for me, the missing symbol was "__aeabi_ui2d". >> >> It's possible that the 32-bit ARM build will fail at a different (later) >> stage as well, but I can't tell until I get past this one. (And I don't >> think I can implement a "shim" function for the missing symbol, just to >> let the build progress.) >> > > I got __aeabi_d2uiz reported missing, in addition to __aeabi_ui2d, if > I build with cross-compiler arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-5. Using dummy > implementations of both them can make build pass. Any chances the > real implementation of these functions cause other missing symbol? (I'll let Ard answer this.) Thanks Laszlo