From: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
To: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe: map framebuffer as write-combining/non-executable
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:20:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <150307684325.17751.1587324408306927566@jljusten-skl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-FSp-SG_sX44uJWQeOEg0WGQCb689imgCgog7=huEe0w@mail.gmail.com>
On 2017-08-18 06:04:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 18 August 2017 at 14:02, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> > When QemuVideoDxe takes control of the framebuffer, it is already
> > mapped EFI_MEMORY_UC by core code, and QemuVideoDxe simply records
> > the base and size from the PCI BAR.
> >
> > On x86 systems, this is sufficient, but on ARM systems, the semantics
> > of EFI_MEMORY_UC regions are quite different from EFI_MEMORY_WC regions,
> > and treating a region like memory (i.e., dereferencing pointers into it
> > or using ordinary CopyMem()/SetMem() functions on it) requires that it
> > be mapped with memory semantics, i.e., EFI_MEMORY_WC, EFI_MEMORY_WT or
> > EFI_MEMORY_WB.
> >
> > Since caching is not appropriate for regions where we rely on side
> > effects, remap the frame buffer EFI_MEMORY_WT.
>
> EFI_MEMORY_WC not WT
If a single pixel is written, then WC may not write it through
immediately. Would WT be more appropriate?
Did you get a chance to test x86 systems with the change?
>
> > Given that the ARM
> > architecture requires device mappings to be non-executable (to avoid
> > inadvertent speculative instruction fetches from device registers),
> > retain the non-executable nature by adding the EFI_MEMORY_XP attribute
> > as well.
> >
> > Note that the crashes that this patch aims to prevent can currently only
> > occur under KVM, in which case the VGA driver does not operate correctly
> > in the first place. However, this is an implementation detail of QEMU
> > while running under KVM, and given that the ARM architecture simply does
> > not permit unaligned accesses to device memory, it is best to conform
> > to this in the code.
> >
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Driver.c | 5 +++++
> > OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Gop.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Qemu.h | 2 ++
> > OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/QemuVideoDxe.inf | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Driver.c b/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Driver.c
> > index 0dce80e59ba8..d81be49d91f3 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Driver.c
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Driver.c
> > @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ QEMU_VIDEO_CARD gQemuVideoCardList[] = {
> > }
> > };
> >
> > +EFI_CPU_ARCH_PROTOCOL *gCpu;
> > +
> > static QEMU_VIDEO_CARD*
> > QemuVideoDetect(
> > IN UINT16 VendorId,
> > @@ -1103,5 +1105,8 @@ InitializeQemuVideo (
> > );
> > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> >
> > + Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid, NULL, (VOID **)&gCpu);
> > + ASSERT_EFI_ERROR(Status);
> > +
> > return Status;
> > }
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Gop.c b/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Gop.c
> > index 512fd27acbda..a820524db293 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Gop.c
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Gop.c
> > @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ QemuVideoCompleteModeData (
> > {
> > EFI_GRAPHICS_OUTPUT_MODE_INFORMATION *Info;
> > EFI_ACPI_ADDRESS_SPACE_DESCRIPTOR *FrameBufDesc;
> > - QEMU_VIDEO_MODE_DATA *ModeData;
> > + QEMU_VIDEO_MODE_DATA *ModeData;
> > + EFI_STATUS Status;
> >
> > ModeData = &Private->ModeData[Mode->Mode];
> > Info = Mode->Info;
> > @@ -72,8 +73,21 @@ QemuVideoCompleteModeData (
> > DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "FrameBufferBase: 0x%Lx, FrameBufferSize: 0x%Lx\n",
> > Mode->FrameBufferBase, (UINT64)Mode->FrameBufferSize));
> >
> > + //
> > + // Remap the framebuffer region as write combining. On x86 systems, this is
> > + // merely a performance optimization, but on ARM systems, it prevents
> > + // crashes that may result from unaligned accesses, given that we treat the
> > + // frame buffer as ordinary memory by using CopyMem()/SetMem() on it. While
> > + // we're at it, set the non-exec attribute so the framebuffer is not
> > + // exploitable by malware.
I'm pretty sure Laszlo would disagree, but I think a more terse
comment would do fine here. (We always have git blame to get the full
story.)
//
// Set the framebuffer region as write combining (through?) and
// non-executable. For ARM the memory range can't be left in the
// uncachable state.
//
> > + //
> > + Status = gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes (gCpu, Mode->FrameBufferBase,
> > + ALIGN_VALUE (Mode->FrameBufferSize, EFI_PAGE_SIZE),
> > + EFI_MEMORY_WC | EFI_MEMORY_XP);
> > + ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> > +
> > FreePool (FrameBufDesc);
> > - return EFI_SUCCESS;
> > + return Status;
> > }
> >
> > STATIC
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Qemu.h b/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Qemu.h
> > index 7fbb25b3efd3..2966c77c78b3 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Qemu.h
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/Qemu.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> >
> >
> > #include <Uefi.h>
> > +#include <Protocol/Cpu.h>
> > #include <Protocol/GraphicsOutput.h>
> > #include <Protocol/PciIo.h>
> > #include <Protocol/DriverSupportedEfiVersion.h>
> > @@ -164,6 +165,7 @@ extern EFI_DRIVER_BINDING_PROTOCOL gQemuVideoDriverBinding;
> > extern EFI_COMPONENT_NAME_PROTOCOL gQemuVideoComponentName;
> > extern EFI_COMPONENT_NAME2_PROTOCOL gQemuVideoComponentName2;
> > extern EFI_DRIVER_SUPPORTED_EFI_VERSION_PROTOCOL gQemuVideoDriverSupportedEfiVersion;
> > +extern EFI_CPU_ARCH_PROTOCOL *gCpu;
> >
> > //
> > // Io Registers defined by VGA
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/QemuVideoDxe.inf b/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/QemuVideoDxe.inf
> > index 346a5aed94fa..bbe11257c002 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/QemuVideoDxe.inf
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/QemuVideoDxe.inf
> > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ [LibraryClasses]
> > UefiLib
> >
> > [Protocols]
> > + gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid # PROTOCOL ALWAYS_CONSUMED
I don't think a 'Driver Model' driver needs to add arch protocols into
the depex.
-Jordan
> > gEfiDriverSupportedEfiVersionProtocolGuid # PROTOCOL ALWAYS_PRODUCED
> > gEfiGraphicsOutputProtocolGuid # PROTOCOL BY_START
> > gEfiDevicePathProtocolGuid # PROTOCOL BY_START
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 13:02 [PATCH] OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe: map framebuffer as write-combining/non-executable Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 13:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 17:20 ` Jordan Justen [this message]
2017-08-18 17:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 17:49 ` Jordan Justen
2017-08-18 18:08 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-08-18 19:36 ` Jordan Justen
2017-08-18 18:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 18:26 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-08-18 21:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-08-18 21:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-22 14:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-22 15:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=150307684325.17751.1587324408306927566@jljusten-skl \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox