public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tien.hock.loh@intel.com
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, leif.lindholm@linaro.org,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, thloh85@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] EmbeddedPkg/DwEmmc: Fix SendCommand parameters
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:52:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1550821967-1630-3-git-send-email-tien.hock.loh@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1550821967-1630-1-git-send-email-tien.hock.loh@intel.com>

From: "Loh, Tien Hock" <tien.hock.loh@intel.com>

Only send BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC if MMC commands needs it.

Fixes parameters to ACMD6 where if CMD is application command, ie. CMD55 is
sent before ACMD6, to do response instead of data transfer.

Added CMD51 handling as CMD51 is a data transfer, and needs BIT_CMD_READ
and BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED to be set.

Updates DwEmmcReceiveResponse to SendCommand only if IsPendingReadCommand
or IsPendingWriteCommand is true.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Loh Tien Hock <tien.hock.loh@intel.com>
---
 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c b/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c
index 6d0f472..600ab01 100644
--- a/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c
+++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ DWEMMC_IDMAC_DESCRIPTOR   *gpIdmacDesc;
 EFI_GUID mDwEmmcDevicePathGuid = EFI_CALLER_ID_GUID;
 STATIC UINT32 mDwEmmcCommand;
 STATIC UINT32 mDwEmmcArgument;
+STATIC BOOLEAN mIsACmd = FALSE;
 
 EFI_STATUS
 DwEmmcReadBlockData (
@@ -321,68 +322,93 @@ DwEmmcSendCommand (
     break;
   case MMC_INDX(2):
     Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_LONG_RESPONSE |
-           BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC | BIT_CMD_SEND_INIT;
+           BIT_CMD_SEND_INIT;
     break;
   case MMC_INDX(3):
-    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT |
            BIT_CMD_SEND_INIT;
     break;
+  case MMC_INDX(6):
+    if(mIsACmd) {
+      Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT ;
+    }
+    else {
+      Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED |
+            BIT_CMD_READ;
+    }
+    break;
   case MMC_INDX(7):
     if (Argument)
-        Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC;
+        Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT;
     else
         Cmd = 0;
     break;
   case MMC_INDX(8):
-    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
-           BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED | BIT_CMD_READ |
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT |
            BIT_CMD_WAIT_PRVDATA_COMPLETE;
     break;
   case MMC_INDX(9):
-    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT |
            BIT_CMD_LONG_RESPONSE;
     break;
   case MMC_INDX(12):
-    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT  |
            BIT_CMD_STOP_ABORT_CMD;
     break;
   case MMC_INDX(13):
-    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT  |
            BIT_CMD_WAIT_PRVDATA_COMPLETE;
     break;
   case MMC_INDX(16):
-    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT  |
            BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED | BIT_CMD_READ |
            BIT_CMD_WAIT_PRVDATA_COMPLETE;
     break;
   case MMC_INDX(17):
   case MMC_INDX(18):
-    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT |
            BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED | BIT_CMD_READ |
            BIT_CMD_WAIT_PRVDATA_COMPLETE;
     break;
   case MMC_INDX(24):
   case MMC_INDX(25):
-    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT  |
            BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED | BIT_CMD_WRITE |
            BIT_CMD_WAIT_PRVDATA_COMPLETE;
     break;
   case MMC_INDX(30):
-    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC |
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT  |
            BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED;
     break;
+  case MMC_INDX(51):
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_DATA_EXPECTED |
+           BIT_CMD_READ | BIT_CMD_WAIT_PRVDATA_COMPLETE;
+    break;
   default:
-    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT | BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC;
+    Cmd = BIT_CMD_RESPONSE_EXPECT ;
     break;
   }
 
   Cmd |= MMC_GET_INDX(MmcCmd) | BIT_CMD_USE_HOLD_REG | BIT_CMD_START;
+
+  if(MMC_INDX(55) == MMC_GET_INDX(MmcCmd))
+    mIsACmd = TRUE;
+  else
+    mIsACmd = FALSE;
+
+  if (!(MmcCmd & MMC_CMD_NO_CRC_RESPONSE)) {
+    Cmd |= BIT_CMD_CHECK_RESPONSE_CRC;
+  }
+
   if (IsPendingReadCommand (Cmd) || IsPendingWriteCommand (Cmd)) {
     mDwEmmcCommand = Cmd;
     mDwEmmcArgument = Argument;
   } else {
+    mDwEmmcCommand = Cmd;
+    mDwEmmcArgument = Argument;
     Status = SendCommand (Cmd, Argument);
   }
+
   return Status;
 }
 
@@ -393,6 +419,11 @@ DwEmmcReceiveResponse (
   IN UINT32*                    Buffer
   )
 {
+  EFI_STATUS Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
+
+  if(IsPendingReadCommand (mDwEmmcCommand) || IsPendingWriteCommand(mDwEmmcCommand))
+    Status = SendCommand (mDwEmmcCommand, mDwEmmcArgument);
+
   if (Buffer == NULL) {
     return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
   }
@@ -410,7 +441,7 @@ DwEmmcReceiveResponse (
     Buffer[2] = MmioRead32 (DWEMMC_RESP2);
     Buffer[3] = MmioRead32 (DWEMMC_RESP3);
   }
-  return EFI_SUCCESS;
+  return Status;
 }
 
 VOID
-- 
2.2.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-22  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-22  7:52 [PATCH 0/4] EmbeddedPkg/DwEmmc: Fix bugs causing DwEmmc to fail to initialize tien.hock.loh
2019-02-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] EmbeddedPkg/DwEmmc: Remove unnecessary MicroSecondDelay tien.hock.loh
2019-02-22  7:52 ` tien.hock.loh [this message]
2019-02-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] EmbeddedPkg/DwEmmc: Fix DMA transfer length tien.hock.loh
2019-02-22  7:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] EmbeddedPkg/DwEmmc: Check DMA completion in SendCommand tien.hock.loh
2019-03-18  1:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] EmbeddedPkg/DwEmmc: Fix bugs causing DwEmmc to fail to initialize Loh, Tien Hock
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-02-22  8:06 tien.hock.loh
2019-02-22  8:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] EmbeddedPkg/DwEmmc: Fix SendCommand parameters tien.hock.loh
2018-10-25  5:52 [PATCH 0/4] EmbeddedPkg/DwEmmc: Fix bugs causing DwEmmc to fail to initialize tien.hock.loh
2018-10-25  5:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] EmbeddedPkg/DwEmmc: Fix SendCommand parameters tien.hock.loh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1550821967-1630-3-git-send-email-tien.hock.loh@intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox