From: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
To: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:03:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <155258662331.20276.3714209093894340086@jljusten-skl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9C6850A@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com>
On 2019-03-13 10:54:22, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
>
> 84141eacac edk2: Remove Contributions.txt and update Readme.md
I guess this removes the requirement for the 'Contributed-under' tag
in commit messages?
But, what about Signed-off-by? Is it desirable to remove that
requirement?
Relatedly, some open source projects have standardized on tying the
Signed-off-by to this text:
https://developercertificate.org/
So, the contributor doesn't have to agree to give the project the
contribution under the Contributed-under terms, but they still
indicate that they believe that the project can use the code under the
project's indicated license.
There is also other information in Contributions.txt that appears to
have been deleted, rather than moved. I guess it is mostly duplicated
on the wiki. That doesn't mean it's not a good idea to duplicate it in
the source tree, or at least provide a web-link. It seems like the
first place devs might look for such information is either the readme,
or Contributions.txt.
Regarding the wiki, I guess it has to be updated after this change is
made. It might be good to add that to the bug so it can't be closed
until that is fixed.
How about updating BaseTools/Scripts/PatchCheck.py?
-Jordan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-14 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-13 17:54 PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License Kinney, Michael D
2019-03-14 10:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-14 19:06 ` Julien Grall
[not found] ` <8F40F2BF-B40F-4338-A832-70AE84B26408@citrix.com>
2019-03-15 9:35 ` Julien Grall
[not found] ` <6FBC013D-4BC9-454C-9D4D-87C96F435704@citrix.com>
2019-03-15 17:18 ` Julien Grall
[not found] ` <C2A0176C-8197-421A-9CA9-2B416DF17EAB@citrix.com>
2019-03-20 12:09 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-23 0:44 ` Kinney, Michael D
2019-03-25 10:04 ` Laszlo Ersek
[not found] ` <720E0EE9-2AED-4110-827D-B87DE5F52862@citrix.com>
2019-03-20 18:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-20 18:42 ` Julien Grall
2019-03-20 20:03 ` Laszlo Ersek
[not found] ` <8A1C7ED9-000A-4EBB-A196-10CE5B9B522F@citrix.com>
2019-03-21 17:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-18 18:17 ` Kinney, Michael D
2019-03-14 18:03 ` Jordan Justen [this message]
2019-03-18 18:25 ` Kinney, Michael D
2019-03-18 19:42 ` Jordan Justen
2019-03-19 17:58 ` Leif Lindholm
2019-03-19 19:09 ` Kinney, Michael D
2019-03-19 19:57 ` Jordan Justen
2019-03-19 20:06 ` Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=155258662331.20276.3714209093894340086@jljusten-skl \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox