public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jordan Justen" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 02/10] MdePkg/PiFirmwareFile: fix undefined behavior in SECTION_SIZE
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:48:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <155544052538.15733.153410443320244157@jljusten-skl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <413ac018-bcf2-f510-00d0-33315974a3c2@redhat.com>

On 2019-04-16 03:59:48, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 04/16/19 11:04, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > On 2019-04-15 09:15:31, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> On 04/14/19 09:19, Jordan Justen wrote:
> >>> On 2019-04-12 16:31:20, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >>>> RH covscan justifiedly reports that accessing
> >>>> "EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER.Size", which is of type UINT8[3], through a
> >>>> (UINT32*), is undefined behavior:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Error: OVERRUN (CWE-119):
> >>>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Sec/SecMain.c:178: overrun-local: Overrunning
> >>>>> array of 3 bytes at byte offset 3 by dereferencing pointer
> >>>>> "(UINT32 *)((EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER *)(UINTN)Section)->Size".
> >>>>> #  176|       Section = (EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER*)(UINTN) CurrentAddress;
> >>>>> #  177|
> >>>>> #  178|->     Size = SECTION_SIZE (Section);
> >>>>> #  179|       if (Size < sizeof (*Section)) {
> >>>>> #  180|         return EFI_VOLUME_CORRUPTED;
> >>>>
> >>>> Fix this by introducing EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER_UNION, and expressing
> >>>> SECTION_SIZE() in terms of "EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER_UNION.Uint32".
> >>>>
> >>>> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> >>>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> >>>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1710
> >>>> Issue: scan-1007.txt
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  MdePkg/Include/Pi/PiFirmwareFile.h | 10 +++++++++-
> >>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Pi/PiFirmwareFile.h b/MdePkg/Include/Pi/PiFirmwareFile.h
> >>>> index a9f3bcc4eb8e..4fce8298d1c0 100644
> >>>> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Pi/PiFirmwareFile.h
> >>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Pi/PiFirmwareFile.h
> >>>> @@ -229,16 +229,24 @@ typedef struct {
> >>>>    ///
> >>>>    UINT8             Size[3];
> >>>>    EFI_SECTION_TYPE  Type;
> >>>>    ///
> >>>>    /// Declares the section type.
> >>>>    ///
> >>>>  } EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER;
> >>>>  
> >>>> +///
> >>>> +/// Union that permits accessing EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER as a UINT32 object.
> >>>> +///
> >>>> +typedef union {
> >>>> +  EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER Hdr;
> >>>> +  UINT32                    Uint32;
> >>>> +} EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER_UNION;
> >>>> +
> >>>>  typedef struct {
> >>>>    ///
> >>>>    /// A 24-bit unsigned integer that contains the total size of the section in bytes,
> >>>>    /// including the EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER.
> >>>>    ///
> >>>>    UINT8             Size[3];
> >>>>  
> >>>>    EFI_SECTION_TYPE  Type;
> >>>> @@ -476,17 +484,17 @@ typedef struct {
> >>>>    /// A UINT16 that represents a particular build. Subsequent builds have monotonically
> >>>>    /// increasing build numbers relative to earlier builds.
> >>>>    ///
> >>>>    UINT16                        BuildNumber;
> >>>>    CHAR16                        VersionString[1];
> >>>>  } EFI_VERSION_SECTION2;
> >>>>  
> >>>>  #define SECTION_SIZE(SectionHeaderPtr) \
> >>>> -    ((UINT32) (*((UINT32 *) ((EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER *) (UINTN) SectionHeaderPtr)->Size) & 0x00ffffff))
> >>>> +    (((EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER_UNION *) (UINTN) (SectionHeaderPtr))->Uint32 & 0x00ffffff)
> >>>
> >>> Mike, all,
> >>>
> >>> Can we add a typedef for EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER_UNION if it's not
> >>> in the PI spec?
> >>>
> >>> If it's not allowed, I think something like this might work too:
> >>>
> >>> #define SECTION_SIZE(SectionHeaderPtr) \
> >>>     (*((UINT32*)(UINTN)(SectionHeaderPtr)) & 0x00ffffff)
> >>
> >> (Less importantly:)
> >>
> >> It might shut up the static analyzer, but regarding the C standard, it's
> >> equally undefined behavior.
> > 
> > I think you are still accessing it through a UINT32*, since you are
> > using a pointer to a union, and an field of type UINT32 within the
> > union.
> 
> Using a union makes the behavior well-defined.
> 
> > 6.2.7 Compatible type and composite type
> >
> > 1 Two types have compatible type if their types are the same.
> >   Additional rules for determining whether two types are compatible
> >   are described in [...]
> 
> > 6.5 Expressions
> >
> > 6 The /effective type/ of an object for an access to its stored value
> >   is the declared type of the object, if any. [...]
> >
> > 7 An object shall have its stored value accessed only by an lvalue
> >   expression that has one of the following types:

I think maybe this all applies to lvalues, not rvalues. The boon and
bane of C is that any pointer can be easily cast to a pointer of any
other type and then dereferenced.

If the pointer is dereferenced to a type that is larger, then I
understand that there are cases where deferencing the pointer could
have unintended side effects, but that is not the case here.

The dereference could also be undefined if big-endian was in the
picture, but UEFI restricts that.

Of course none of this stops a tool from trying to delve further into
the pointer usage to look for possible issues.

But, I don't see how any of this changes the fact that with or without
the union, we are dereferencing a UINT32 pointer.

-Jordan

> >
> >   \u2014 a type compatible with the effective type of the object,
> >   \u2014 a qualified version of a type compatible with the effective type
> >     of the object,
> >   \u2014 a type that is the signed or unsigned type corresponding to the
> >     effective type of the object,
> >   \u2014 a type that is the signed or unsigned type corresponding to a
> >     qualified version of the effective type of the object,
> >   \u2014 an aggregate or union type that includes one of the aforementioned
> >     types among its members (including, recursively, a member of a
> >     subaggregate or contained union), or
> >   \u2014 a character type.
> 
> - Regarding 6.5p6, the original object we intend to access has
> (declared) type EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER. Therefore the effective type
> is EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER.
> 
> - Based on 6.2.7p1, EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER is compatible with
> EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER. (Because they are the same.)
> 
> - Based on 6.5p7 item #5, EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER can be accessed as
> EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER_UNION, because EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER_UNION
> includes "a type compatible with the effective type of the object" (#1)
> among its members -- namely an EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER, which is
> compatible with EFI_COMMON_SECTION_HEADER, because they are the same.
> 
> > I guess it might more well defined to shift the bytes, like is
> > sometimes done with the FFS file sizes.
> 
> I did that (i.e. byte-shifting) in the other patch:
> 
>   [edk2-devel] [PATCH 04/10]
>   MdePkg/PiFirmwareFile: fix undefined behavior in FFS_FILE_SIZE
> 
> but for SECTION_SIZE, the union is well-defined too.
> 
> Thanks,
> Laszlo
> 
> > 
> > -Jordan
> > 
> >> Anyway I don't feel too strongly about this, given that we disable the
> >> strict aliasing / effective type rules in "tools_def.template"
> >> ("-fno-strict-aliasing").
> >>
> >>> Then again, I see SECTION_SIZE is not in the spec, so maybe it's ok to
> >>> add the typedef.
> >>
> >> (More importantly:)
> >>
> >> Indeed the doubt you voice about ..._UNION crossed my mind, but then I
> >> too searched the PI spec for SECTION_SIZE, with no hits.
> >>
> >> Beyond that, I searched both the PI and UEFI specs, for "_UNION" --
> >> again no hits, despite our definitions of:
> >>
> >> - EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER_UNION
> >> - EFI_GRAPHICS_OUTPUT_BLT_PIXEL_UNION
> >>
> >> in
> >>
> >> - "MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PeImage.h"
> >> - "MdePkg/Include/Protocol/GraphicsOutput.h"
> >>
> >> respectively.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Laszlo
> >>
> >>>
> >>> -Jordan
> >>>
> >>
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-16 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-12 23:31 [PATCH 00/10] patches for some warnings raised by "RH covscan" Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 01/10] MdePkg/PiFirmwareFile: express IS_SECTION2 in terms of SECTION_SIZE Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:01   ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 02/10] MdePkg/PiFirmwareFile: fix undefined behavior in SECTION_SIZE Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-14  7:19   ` [edk2-devel] " Jordan Justen
2019-04-15 16:15     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-16  8:28       ` Liming Gao
2019-04-16  9:04       ` Jordan Justen
2019-04-16 10:59         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-16 16:50           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-17 10:08             ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-16 18:48           ` Jordan Justen [this message]
2019-04-16 23:25             ` Andrew Fish
2019-04-17 10:29               ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-17 11:44                 ` Andrew Fish
2019-04-17 14:59                   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-17 19:35                     ` Jordan Justen
2019-04-18  9:38                       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-18 15:18                         ` Liming Gao
2019-04-17 10:01             ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 03/10] BaseTools/PiFirmwareFile: " Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 04/10] MdePkg/PiFirmwareFile: fix undefined behavior in FFS_FILE_SIZE Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:23   ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-17 17:52   ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-17 18:31     ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-18  9:06       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-17 18:31     ` Andrew Fish
2019-04-17 18:36       ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-18  8:48         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-18  8:45       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-18 23:12         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-18 17:20     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-18 17:59       ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-18 18:12         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 05/10] OvmfPkg/Sec: fix out-of-bounds reads Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:24   ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 06/10] OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe: avoid arithmetic on null pointer Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 07/10] OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe: suppress invalid "deref of undef pointer" warning Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:26   ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 08/10] OvmfPkg: suppress "Value stored to ... is never read" analyzer warnings Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-14  8:03   ` [edk2-devel] " Jordan Justen
2019-04-15 16:25     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-16  9:26       ` Jordan Justen
2019-04-16 11:44         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 09/10] OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe: catch theoretical nullptr deref in Xen code Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:28   ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 10/10] OvmfPkg/BasePciCapLib: suppress invalid "nullptr deref" warning Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:31   ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-16 11:01     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:36 ` [PATCH 00/10] patches for some warnings raised by "RH covscan" Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-15 16:16   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-18 14:20 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=155544052538.15733.153410443320244157@jljusten-skl \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox