From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: intel.com, ip: 192.55.52.43, mailfrom: jordan.l.justen@intel.com)
Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43])
 by groups.io with SMTP; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:35:18 -0700
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32])
  by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jun 2019 00:35:18 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
Received: from leewonjo-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.251.129.208])
  by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2019 00:35:17 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190611014313.12160-1-hao.a.wu@intel.com>
References: <20190611014313.12160-1-hao.a.wu@intel.com>
From: "Jordan Justen" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Ovmf: Drop IntelFramework[Module]Pkg dependency
To: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, D Scott Phillips <d.scott.phillips@intel.com>
Message-ID: <156023851748.468.9950138266923344967@jljusten-skl>
User-Agent: alot/0.8
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:35:17 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2019-06-10 18:43:07, Hao A Wu wrote:
> The series is also available at:
> https://github.com/hwu25/edk2/tree/ovmf_drop_framework_v2
>=20
> V2 changes:
>=20
> * Update to module OvmfPkg/Csm/CsmSupportLib/CsmSupportLib.inf has been
>   dropped, since the module is proposed to be removed in another series:
>   https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/42142

I see that https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1811
mentions that there is "missing of reviewer/maintainer of the CSM
modules in OvmfPkg", so it will be dropped. Yet, I thought David
agreed to maintain that support as recently as May 20:

https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/41049

Maybe he changed his mind about it?

By the way, I know that Scott (Cc'd) was interested in leveraging CSM
support of OVMF for a fork that supports the BSD bhyve hypervisor.

-Jordan