From: "Jordan Justen" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 11/10] OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBiosDxe: Correct Legacy16GetTableAddress call for E820 data
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:40:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <156041165954.1758.7451081062097429166@jljusten-skl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C8F0053@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 2019-06-12 23:28:12, Wu, Hao A wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> > David Woodhouse
> > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 5:43 AM
> >
> > The DX register is supposed to contain the required alignment for the
> > allocation. It was zero, and SeaBIOS doesn't (well, didn't) cope well
> > with that. Set it appropriately, and set BX to indicate the regions
> > it's OK to allocate in too. That was already OK but let's make sure
> > it's initialised properly and not just working by chance.
> >
> > Also actually return an error if the allocation fails. Instead of going
> > all the way through into the CSM and just letting it have a bogus
> > pointer to the E82o data.
'E82o' => 'E820'
> >
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBiosDxe/LegacyBootSupport.c
> > b/OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBiosDxe/LegacyBootSupport.c
> > index 211750c012..e7766eb2b1 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBiosDxe/LegacyBootSupport.c
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBiosDxe/LegacyBootSupport.c
> > @@ -928,7 +928,9 @@ GenericLegacyBoot (
> > if (CopySize > Private->Legacy16Table->E820Length) {
> > ZeroMem (&Regs, sizeof (EFI_IA32_REGISTER_SET));
> > Regs.X.AX = Legacy16GetTableAddress;
> > + Regs.X.BX = (UINT16) 0x3; // Region
>
>
> According to the spec:
>
> '''
> BX = Allocation region
> 00 = Allocate from either 0xE0000 or 0xF0000 64 KB blocks.
> Bit 0 = 1 Allocate from 0xF0000 64 KB block
> Bit 1 = 1 Allocate from 0xE0000 64 KB block
> '''
>
> I think the value 0 for BX is fine which indicates the allocation can
> happen in either ranges. Not sure if setting BX to 0x11 is a valid
> operation.
Based on the spec you quote, it does seem reasonable to expect that a
CSM should treat 0 the same as 3, but it is possible that some CSM out
there made a silly choice and would blow up on 3.
Since David mentioned that bx==0 works ok with SeaBIOS CSM, then maybe
we should just drop this change? Or, we can add a comment that bx==0
means either the e000 or f000 block?
-Jordan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-13 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-27 3:03 [PATCH v2 00/10] Duplicate required CSM components for OVMF Wu, Hao A
2019-05-27 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] Maintainers.txt: Add maintainer for CSM components in OvmfPkg Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 13:26 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-27 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] OvmfPkg: Copy the required CSM components from framework packages Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 13:40 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-27 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.dec: Add definitions for CSM-related Guid & Protocol Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 13:49 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-27 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.dec: Add the new include folder for CSM header files Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 13:49 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-27 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.dec: Add PCD definitions used by copied CSM modules Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 14:09 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-27 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] OvmfPkg/Csm/VideoDxe: Update to make it build for OVMF Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 14:10 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-27 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBiosDxe: " Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 14:15 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-27 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBootMaintUiLib: " Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 14:16 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-27 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBootManagerLib: " Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 14:17 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-27 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] OvmfPkg: Update DSC/FDF files to consume CSM components in OvmfPkg Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 14:22 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-28 11:48 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/10] Duplicate required CSM components for OVMF Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-29 1:12 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-06-03 9:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-06-12 21:40 ` David Woodhouse
2019-06-14 5:08 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Hao A
2019-06-12 21:43 ` [PATCH 11/10] OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBiosDxe: Correct Legacy16GetTableAddress call for E820 data David Woodhouse
2019-06-13 6:28 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Hao A
2019-06-13 7:10 ` Ni, Ray
2019-06-13 7:40 ` Jordan Justen [this message]
2019-06-13 8:00 ` David Woodhouse
2019-06-13 8:34 ` David Woodhouse
2019-06-13 12:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-06-13 8:40 ` [PATCH v2 11/10] OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBiosDxe: Fix " David Woodhouse
2019-06-13 14:23 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=156041165954.1758.7451081062097429166@jljusten-skl \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox