Re: [edk2-devel] Interpretation of specification

[James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>]

On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 18:17 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hello James,
> 
> On 01/08/20 20:13, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 12:24 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > > I don't know where sbsigntools development occurs (mailing list,
> > > bug
> > > tracker, ...). For now, I'm CC'ing James. (The git repo lives in
> > > his
> > > space on <git.kernel.org>.)
> > 
> > Heh, that's a sore point: since Jeremy Kerr left ubuntu, no-one
> > except
> > me has been maintaining it; Jeremy owns the original tree on the
> > Ubuntu
> > servers but can't update it any more.
> > 
> > I use groups.io for the openssl_tpm2_engine development list, so I
> > suppose I can set one up for sbsigntools ... OK, done.  If you want
> > to
> > you can package the above up as a patch and send it there and I'll
> > apply it.
> 
> I've now posted:
> 
>   [PATCH] sbvarsign: fix
> "EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATION_2.TimeStamp.Year" assignment
>   Message-Id: <20200109171302.28782-1-lersek@redhat.com>
> 
> to <sbsigntools@groups.io>.
> 
> I didn't (and most likely, won't) subscribe to that list, so please
> whitelist this individual posting of mine, on the <https://sbsigntool
> s.groups.io> admin interface.

Heh, trying to dust off the groups.io setup memories as we speak.  I
can't allow fully unmoderated postings, unfortunately.  I also think
the group rejected this out of hand because it's not in the moderation
queue, but I think I've found the flag that holds non-member posts for
moderation and thus allows them to be posted instead of rejected.

James