public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kun Qin" <kuqin12@gmail.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com
Cc: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Qi1" <qi1.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Kumar, Rahul1" <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
	Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>, Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	"Liu, Zhiguang" <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging][PATCH v1 0/7] Add TPM subclass definition
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:39:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15c96a4b-1920-96f4-4410-29049519de52@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB4929FBF5FF6AB3EEBEB5C5AAD2889@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Mike,

The intention was to encourage the usage of new definition in .H file 
once the definition
is updated. The PCD is left as is only to serve as backwards 
compatibility purpose.

Do you think only updating the DEC and .H file is more ideal? I could 
drop the other changes
if so desired.

Thanks,
Kun

On 7/13/2022 5:30 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> Hi Kun,
>
> Why was the PCD usage not preserved and only the value updated in the DEC file and .H file?
>
> Mike
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 5:21 PM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi1 <qi1.zhang@intel.com>; Kumar, Rahul1
>> <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>; Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>; Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>; Kinney, Michael D
>> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging][PATCH v1 0/7] Add TPM subclass definition
>>
>> Hi SecurityPkg maintainers & EDK2 stewards,
>>
>> I sent out this patch series intending to update/fix the PI spec through
>> code first process.
>>
>> Could you please shed some light on it and let me know if any feedback?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kun
>>
>> On 7/5/2022 8:38 PM, Kun Qin via groups.io wrote:
>>> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3966
>>>
>>>   From PI Specification v1.7 Errata A, EFI_PERIPHERAL_DOCKING is defined as
>>> 0xD0000 (as well as included in PiStatusCode.h).
>>>
>>> However, subclass employed as PCD for TPM peripheral in SecurityPkg is
>>> also defined as 0xD0000. The TPM subclass code was used in TcgPei.c when
>>> reporting error codes.
>>>
>>> The collision of subclass definition could cause the parsing of reported
>>> errors being ambiguous.
>>>
>>> This patch series add EFI_PERIPHERAL_TPM as a spec-defined value and
>>> removed potential usages in the SecurityPkg.
>>>
>>> Patch v1 branch: https://github.com/kuqin12/edk2/tree/BZ3966-add_tpm_subclass
>>>
>>> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
>>> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
>>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
>>> Cc: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Kun Qin (7):
>>>     EDK2 Code First: PI Specification: New peripheral subclass for TPM
>>>     MdePkg: MmCommunication: Add TPM subclass definition to MdePkg
>>>     SecurityPkg: Tcg2Dxe: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>     SecurityPkg: Tcg2Pei: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>     SecurityPkg: TcgDxe: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>     SecurityPkg: TcgPei: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>     SecurityPkg: SubClassTpm: Updated default value
>>>
>>>    SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Dxe/Tcg2Dxe.c   |  4 +-
>>>    SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Pei/Tcg2Pei.c   |  4 +-
>>>    SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgDxe/TcgDxe.c     |  2 +-
>>>    SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgPei/TcgPei.c     |  4 +-
>>>    CodeFirst/BZ3966-SpecChange.md      | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    MdePkg/Include/Pi/PiStatusCode.h    |  1 +
>>>    SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.dec         |  6 +-
>>>    SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.uni         |  2 +-
>>>    SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Dxe/Tcg2Dxe.inf |  1 -
>>>    SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Pei/Tcg2Pei.inf |  1 -
>>>    SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgDxe/TcgDxe.inf   |  1 -
>>>    SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgPei/TcgPei.inf   |  1 -
>>>    12 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>    create mode 100644 CodeFirst/BZ3966-SpecChange.md
>>>
>
> 
>
>

      reply	other threads:[~2022-07-14  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <16FF20526D0669CC.28163@groups.io>
2022-07-14  0:21 ` [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging][PATCH v1 0/7] Add TPM subclass definition Kun Qin
2022-07-14  0:30   ` Michael D Kinney
2022-07-14  0:39     ` Kun Qin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15c96a4b-1920-96f4-4410-29049519de52@gmail.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox