From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>,
Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>,
Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] EdkCompatibilityPkg: remove PE/COFF header workaround for ELILO on IPF
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 18:53:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1687b7c4-4bce-d184-8e23-d156d3a4a9df@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180906134523.2036-5-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
On 09/06/18 15:45, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Now that Itanium support has been dropped, we can remove the various
> occurrences of the ELILO on Itanium PE/COFF header workaround.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=816
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> EdkCompatibilityPkg/Foundation/Library/EdkIIGlueLib/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c | 60 +++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
Should we care about EdkCompatibilityPkg at all? Because:
* IPF removal seems not to have occurred to EdkCompatibilityPkg:
$ git grep -w IPF -- 'EdkCompatibilityPkg/*inf'
[bunch of hits]
* In <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=816#c7>, you wrote:
> [...] there is a big difference between IPF drivers that are never
> referenced by modern platforms, and workarounds in generic code that
> are present in every modern build for every platform, and are only
> intended for a specific build of ELILO.
> The former is essentially dead code. The latter gets executed many
> times on every boot of every modern UEFI platform in existence.
Under that distinction, I would classify EdkCompatibilityPkg as the
first category, i.e., essentially dead code.
(I'm pointing this out in the hope that it'll save me the review of this
patch! :) )
Thanks!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-06 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-06 13:45 [PATCH 0/4] remove all 11 occurrences of ELILO on IPF PE/COFF header hack Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-06 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] MdeModulePkg: remove PE/COFF header workaround for ELILO on IPF Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-06 16:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-09-07 5:15 ` Zeng, Star
2018-09-06 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] MdePkg/BasePeCoffLib: " Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-06 16:31 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-09-07 5:15 ` Zeng, Star
2018-09-07 5:36 ` Gao, Liming
2018-09-06 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] SecurityPkg: " Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-06 16:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-09-06 17:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-06 18:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-09-06 13:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] EdkCompatibilityPkg: " Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-06 16:53 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2018-09-06 17:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-06 18:01 ` Carsey, Jaben
2018-09-06 18:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-09-06 14:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] remove all 11 occurrences of ELILO on IPF PE/COFF header hack Yao, Jiewen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1687b7c4-4bce-d184-8e23-d156d3a4a9df@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox